Ottawa Knee Rules
The five Ottawa Knee Rule criteria
Who it is for. The rule is built for the acute, isolated, blunt knee injury in an alert patient. It also applies to children, on the strength of a separate paediatric validation discussed under limitations.
When it does not apply. Set the rule aside in:
- Pregnancy β avoid ionising radiation where possible and image on clinical judgement
- Obvious deformity or a clinically evident fracture
- Penetrating injury β open wounds follow a different pathway
- Polytrauma or a distracting injury β ATLS governs
- Isolated superficial skin injury
- Re-assessment of a knee already imaged in this episode

The criteria. A knee radiograph series is indicated if any one of the five is positive. Do not wait for several before imaging.
- Criterion
- Age 55 years or older
- How to test
- Ask the patient (or check the record)
- Positive when
- Age 55 or more at the time of injury
- Criterion
- Tenderness at the head of the fibula
- How to test
- Palpate the fibular head and proximal fibula
- Positive when
- Reproducible tenderness at the lateral prominence
- Criterion
- Isolated tenderness of the patella
- How to test
- Palpate the patella and the rest of the knee
- Positive when
- Tenderness confined to the patella with no other bony tenderness
- Criterion
- Inability to flex the knee to 90Β°
- How to test
- Ask the patient to bend the knee
- Positive when
- Cannot reach 90Β° of flexion (pain or mechanical block)
- Criterion
- Inability to bear weight for four steps
- How to test
- Ask about immediate weight-bearing AND observe in the ED
- Positive when
- Cannot take four weight-bearing steps (limping counts) both immediately and in the ED
Isolated means only. Isolated patellar tenderness means the patella is the only tender bony point. Joint-line tenderness does not satisfy the rule: it is a soft-tissue sign, not a criterion. Palpate the patella deliberately, because a vertical or osteochondral patellar fracture is easily missed otherwise.

Four steps, both times. Weight-bearing is the most mis-applied criterion. The test is four steps, two onto each foot, assessed at both time points: immediately after the injury and in the department. A limp counts as weight-bearing. Ask about the scene as well as watching the patient walk in the department.
How to apply the rule in practice
- 1Confirm the rule appliesAcute, isolated, blunt knee injury in an alert patient, with none of the exclusions.
- 2Check all five criteriaTake the weight-bearing history from the scene AND observe it in the ED.
- 3Any positive β radiographStandard knee series (AP, lateral, skyline; add a tunnel/notch view if a patellar or osteochondral fracture is suspected). Record the positive criterion.
- 4All negative β clinical careDiagnose a soft-tissue injury; RICE, analgesia, early mobilisation, and clear return precautions. Document the negative criteria and the weight-bearing attempt.
A negative rule. A negative rule makes a clinically significant fracture very unlikely. It does not exclude internal derangement (ACL, meniscal, osteochondral) or a non-displaced patellar or tibial-plateau fracture.
Give clear return precautions: increasing pain, inability to weight-bear beyond 48 hours, a new effusion, or a locked knee all warrant re-assessment and often MRI. Severe pain disproportionate to the mechanism in an older patient should trigger imaging even if the rule is negative.
A positive rule. Specificity is intentionally low: 48.6% pooled by Bachmann, 54% in the adult derivation and 42.8% in the paediatric validation, roughly 43β54% across the studies cited here. Roughly half the patients who trigger a criterion turn out to have no fracture, so a positive rule means "this knee needs a radiograph", never "this knee is fractured". The rule over-images deliberately: it is a rule-out instrument, and the false positives are the price paid for missing nothing important. Use it to decide whether plain films are needed, not to "clear" a knee for sport.
Limitations, pitfalls & modern context
A fracture rule, not a soft-tissue rule. The rule will not detect an isolated ACL rupture, meniscal tear or patellar dislocation; these need examination and frequently MRI. Examiners push on what it misses: the acute tense haemarthrosis and the subtle plain-film signs of occult injury. A tense haemarthrosis in a young athlete is one of the following until proven otherwise, regardless of normal films:
- ACL rupture, the commonest cause at around 70β75%
- A peripheral meniscal tear
- A patellar dislocation, often self-reduced, with an MPFL or medial retinacular tear
- An osteochondral fracture
- A PCL injury or an intra-articular fracture
The fat-fluid level. A lipohaemarthrosis, the "FBI" sign, is a fat-fluid level from marrow fat escaping into the joint. On a horizontal-beam (cross-table) lateral it is pathognomonic of an intra-articular fracture even when no fracture line is visible, often an occult tibial plateau fracture. That is the reason to obtain the horizontal-beam lateral and look hard.
The avulsion clues. Spotting any of these on a film that is otherwise negative for obvious fracture changes the whole work-up towards MRI and ligament assessment:
- Segond fracture β a small avulsion off the lateral tibial rim (anterolateral ligament/lateral capsule), strongly associated with an ACL rupture
- Reverse Segond β the medial rim, pointing to a PCL/medial-meniscus injury
- Arcuate sign β avulsion of the fibular head/styloid, signalling a posterolateral corner injury
When the films are normal. CT and MRI are more sensitive than plain films for occult tibial-plateau, osteochondral and Segond-type injuries. Consider them when the films are normal but the patient still cannot weight-bear. After a negative rule, persistent inability to weight-bear beyond 48 hours, an effusion or mechanical symptoms is a legitimate indication for cross-sectional imaging.

Children. The rule has been validated in children aged 2β16 with 100% sensitivity. Most guidelines use about age 5 as the practical lower limit, so apply it with caution in pre-school children.
Reliability. Inter-observer agreement is good, with kappa around 0.77β0.91. The age and weight-bearing items still depend on the history given, and isolated patellar tenderness on careful palpation, so document what you asked and found.
Impact. The cost-saving holds across health systems: the rule consistently reduces knee radiography by ~20β30% without an increase in missed fractures.
The Pittsburgh Knee Rules. The examiner often asks for an alternative, and the main one is the Pittsburgh rule, which applies specifically to a knee injury from blunt trauma or a fall. Radiograph if that mechanism is present and either of:
- Age younger than 12 or older than 50 years
- Inability to walk four weight-bearing steps in the emergency department
It excludes an injury more than ~6 days old, prior surgery or fracture on that knee, and re-assessment.
Ottawa or Pittsburgh. Both have very high (near-100%) sensitivity for fracture, but Pittsburgh is generally reported to have higher specificity, so it sends fewer uninjured knees for radiographs. The trade-off is that Pittsburgh requires a qualifying mechanism and an age cut-off at both extremes, whereas Ottawa adds the patellar, fibular-head and flexion criteria. Ottawa is the more widely taught and used, and Pittsburgh the credible, more specific alternative worth naming. Either way the same safety nets apply: acute injury only, and a negative rule excludes a fracture, not internal derangement.
Viva practice
- Five criteria: Age β₯55, fibular head tenderness, isolated patellar tenderness, can't flex to 90Β°, can't weight-bear 4 steps β ANY ONE positive = image.
- Weight-bearing = 4 steps at BOTH time points (scene + ED); limp counts as weight-bearing.
- ~98β100% sensitivity, low specificity by design; ~20β30% fewer radiographs.
- Do NOT apply in pregnancy, deformity, penetrating/multi-trauma, or re-imaging.
- Fracture rule, not soft-tissue rule β a negative rule doesn't exclude ACL/meniscal/osteochondral injury.
- Paediatric: validated from age 2, used from ~age 5 by convention.
Exam viva
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
βA 34-year-old man twists his knee playing football. He is tender only over the medial joint line, can flex to 110 degrees, has walked into the department limping, and is 32 years old. He cannot recall whether he could bear weight immediately after the injury. Examination shows no deformity, no effusion, and a stable knee. Does he need radiographs?β
βA 17-year-old girl is brought in after a fall during netball. She has an obvious tense effusion, a guarded knee, and cannot bear weight. She is tender over the lateral femoral condyle. How do you apply the Ottawa Knee Rules and what is your initial work-up?β
Exam cheat sheet
The five criteria
- Age 55 years or older
- Tenderness at the head of the fibula
- Isolated tenderness of the patella
- Inability to flex the knee to 90Β°
- Inability to bear weight for four steps, both immediately after injury and in the ED
Apply and act
- Any one criterion positive = standard knee series (AP, lateral, skyline; tunnel if indicated)
- All five negative = clinically clear: RICE, analgesia, early mobilisation, return precautions
- Negative rule but high suspicion = image anyway and document the reason
Caveats & modern context
- Sensitivity ~98β100%, specificity roughly 43β54% (pooled 48.6%) β designed to over-image deliberately
- Do NOT use in pregnancy, obvious deformity, penetrating injury, multi-trauma, or re-assessment
- Reduces knee radiography by ~20β30%; consistent across health systems and seniority
- A negative rule does not exclude internal derangement β persistent locking/effusion/non-weight-bearing beyond 48 h warrants MRI
Evidence
Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries
- Prospective derivation in 1047 adults; from 23 candidate findings, five variables predicted the 68 knee fractures: age β₯55, fibular head tenderness, isolated patellar tenderness, inability to flex to 90Β°, and inability to bear weight 4 steps.
- The derived rule had 100% sensitivity (95% CI 0.95β1.0) and 54% specificity for clinically significant fracture.
- Applying it would have reduced knee radiography by ~28% (from 68.6% to 49.4%).
Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries
- Prospective validation in 1096 adults; the rule was 100% sensitive (95% CI 0.94β1.0) for the 63 clinically important fractures.
- The probability of fracture when the rule was negative was 0% (95% CI 0β0.4%); physicians interpreted it reliably (kappa 0.77).
- Potential radiography reduction ~28%; attempts to refine the rule improved specificity only at an unacceptable cost to sensitivity.
Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries
- Before/after controlled trial across 4 EDs (3907 patients): implementation produced a 26.4% relative reduction in knee radiography in the intervention hospitals versus 1.3% in controls, with no missed fractures.
- The rule was 100% sensitive for the 58 fractures and reliably interpreted (kappa 0.91).
- Patients discharged without radiography spent less time in the ED and incurred lower charges.
The rule was derived by Stiell et al. 1995 (DOI 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70106-0; 100% sensitivity, ~28% reduction), prospectively validated by Stiell et al. 1996 (PMID 8594242; 0% fracture probability when negative) and implemented by Stiell et al. 1997 (PMID 9403421; 26.4% reduction, kappa 0.91). The pooled accuracy (sensitivity 98.5%, specificity 48.6%, negative LR 0.05) comes from Bachmann et al. 2004 (DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-140-5-200403020-00013), and the paediatric validation (100% sensitive, 31.2% reduction) from Bulloch et al. 2003 (DOI 10.1067/mem.2003.196).