Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Orthopaedic Exam Prep
OrthoVellum
Orthopaedic Exam Prep

Exam-focused orthopaedic references, a question bank, viva practice, and spaced-repetition revision — with every clinical claim traceable to its source. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.

Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology
  • Editorial Policy

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Snapping Scapula Syndrome

Back to Topics
Contents
0%

Snapping Scapula Syndrome

Clinical overview of Snapping Scapula Syndrome, including presentation, investigations, treatment principles, complications, and follow-up.

complete
Reviewed: 2026-06-07Maintained by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team
Peer-reviewed editorial processMethodologyReport a correction
High-yield overview

Scapulothoracic Bursitis | Painful Crepitus | Osseous vs Soft-Tissue Causes | Arthroscopic Bursectomy

Ribs 2-7Span of scapulothoracic articulation
Up to 80%Settle with non-operative care
6 monthsConservative trial before surgery
OsteochondromaMost common bony cause

CAUSE-BASED CLASSIFICATION

Soft-tissue (bursal)
PatternInflamed or fibrotic scapulothoracic bursa, muscle atrophy or fibrosis, overuse
TreatmentTherapy, injection, arthroscopic bursectomy
Osseous
PatternOsteochondroma, malunited rib/scapula fracture, Luschka tubercle, abnormal scapular shape
TreatmentResect the offending bony lesion
Idiopathic / postural
PatternNo structural lesion, often scapular dyskinesis
TreatmentScapular stabilisation and posture programme

Critical Must-Knows

  • Crepitus is not always pathological - painless snapping in many people is normal and needs no treatment
  • Scapulothoracic articulation glides over ribs 2-7; the superomedial angle is the key trouble spot
  • Osteochondroma is the most common osseous cause - always exclude a bony lesion with CT
  • Non-operative care first - therapy, posture, scapular stabilisation succeed in most patients
  • Arthroscopic bursectomy with superomedial angle resection is the surgery of choice when conservative care fails

Clinical Pearls

  • "
    Distinguish painful crepitus (a problem) from painless snapping (usually normal)
  • "
    A loud thumping/grinding sound suggests an osseous cause - get a CT
  • "
    The dorsal scapular nerve and artery and the suprascapular nerve are at risk during surgery
  • "
    Avoid resecting too much superomedial bone - risks detaching levator scapulae and serratus anterior

Clinical Imaging

Critical Snapping Scapula Exam Points

Painful vs Painless Snapping

Painless scapular crepitus is common and usually benign - it does not need treatment. The syndrome is defined by pain plus crepitus. Do not investigate or operate on an asymptomatic snap. Examiners want you to recognise this distinction first.

Always Exclude a Bony Lesion

A loud thumping or grinding noise, a palpable hard lump, or onset after trauma points to an osseous cause. The most common is an osteochondroma; others are malunited rib or scapular fractures, a prominent Luschka tubercle, and abnormal scapular curvature. CT is the investigation of choice.

Neurovascular Structures at Risk

Surgery near the superomedial angle endangers the dorsal scapular nerve and artery (medial border) and the suprascapular nerve (spinoglenoid/scapular notch). Keep bony resection of the superomedial angle limited (commonly cited around 2-3cm) to protect these and avoid stripping levator scapulae and serratus anterior.

Diagnostic Injection Guides Surgery

A bursal local anaesthetic and steroid injection is both therapeutic and diagnostic - good temporary relief confirms the bursa/scapulothoracic space as the pain source and predicts a better surgical outcome. Poor injection response should make you reconsider the diagnosis before operating.

Snapping Scapula At a Glance

ParameterSoft-Tissue (Bursal) CauseOsseous Cause
Typical soundSoft grating, rubbing, snappingLoud thumping, clunking, grinding
Common pathologyInflamed/fibrotic bursa, muscle atrophy or fibrosis, overuseOsteochondroma, malunited rib/scapula fracture, Luschka tubercle
Best initial imagingPlain radiographs (often normal)Plain films then CT (CT is definitive)
Role of injectionDiagnostic and therapeutic into the bursaLess useful - lesion is structural
First-line treatmentTherapy, posture, scapular stabilisation, injectionResect the offending bony lesion
Definitive surgeryArthroscopic bursectomy +/- superomedial angle resectionExcision of osteochondroma / bony prominence
Prognosis after surgeryGood relief, low recurrenceExcellent once mechanical block removed

Memory Aids

Overview

Snapping scapula syndrome describes painful crepitus of the scapulothoracic articulation - the soft-tissue junction where the front (costal) surface of the scapula glides over the back of the rib cage. The patient feels and often hears a snapping, grinding or thumping as the shoulder blade moves, and this is accompanied by pain, typically over the superomedial corner of the scapula.

The key conceptual point for the exam is that crepitus alone is not a disease. Painless scapular snapping is found in a large proportion of normal people and requires no treatment. The clinical syndrome only exists when crepitus is symptomatic - that is, painful or functionally limiting.

It is a relatively uncommon and probably underdiagnosed condition. According to PubMed, the largest critical review of the literature found that the evidence base is dominated by small case series and technique papers, with no high-level trials, so much of management is guided by anatomical understanding and expert consensus rather than randomised data.

It is useful to separate two overlapping terms:

  • Scapulothoracic bursitis - inflammation or fibrosis of a bursa in the scapulothoracic space, usually producing pain with a softer grating sensation.
  • Scapulothoracic crepitus - the audible/palpable grinding, popping or thumping, which when loud is more suggestive of an underlying bony lesion.

Both can coexist, and both fall under the umbrella of snapping scapula syndrome.

Pathophysiology & Anatomy

The Scapulothoracic Articulation

The scapulothoracic "joint" is not a true synovial joint but a musculofascial gliding interface between the concave costal surface of the scapula and the convex posterior chest wall, spanning the levels of ribs 2 to 7. Smooth motion here is essential because scapulothoracic rhythm contributes roughly one-third of total shoulder elevation, positioning the glenoid to optimise glenohumeral function.

Several bursae lie within this space. Anatomical studies describe two consistent major (anatomic) bursae and several inconstant minor (adventitial) bursae:

  • Infraserratus bursa - between the serratus anterior and the chest wall.
  • Supraserratus bursa - between the subscapularis and the serratus anterior.
  • Adventitial bursae - variable, often at the superomedial angle and inferior angle of the scapula; these develop in response to friction and are frequently the symptomatic ones.

The superomedial angle is the single most important location, because it is where the levator scapulae inserts, where adventitial bursae commonly form, and where bony abnormalities most often cause mechanical catching.

How Symptoms Arise

The space between scapula and ribs is normally cushioned by muscle (subscapularis and serratus anterior) and the bursae. Pathology develops when this cushioning fails or when the surfaces no longer glide smoothly:

  • Reduced soft-tissue cushioning - muscle atrophy or fibrosis (for example after disuse, denervation or trauma) brings bone closer to bone.
  • Bursal inflammation or fibrosis - repetitive overhead activity inflames a bursa, which then thickens and becomes painful and noisy.
  • A mechanical block - an osseous lesion (most commonly an osteochondroma), a malunited rib or scapular fracture, a prominent Luschka tubercle (a bony prominence at the superomedial angle), or an abnormally curved/hooked scapula physically obstructs gliding.
  • Altered scapular mechanics - scapular dyskinesis, postural rounding (thoracic kyphosis) and weakness of the scapular stabilisers change the contact pressures and provoke symptoms.

Classification

There is no single universally accepted formal classification. The clinically and surgically useful way to organise causes - and the way examiners expect you to think - is by whether the cause is soft-tissue or osseous, because this directs the treatment.

Scapulothoracic bursitis, muscle atrophy or fibrosis, and overuse changes. The noise is usually a softer rubbing or grating sensation. Treatment is therapy and injection first, with arthroscopic bursectomy if refractory.

Osteochondroma (most common), malunited rib or scapular fracture, Luschka tubercle, and abnormal scapular curvature. The noise is typically a loud thumping, clunking or grinding. Identify on CT and resect the offending lesion.

No structural lesion - scapular dyskinesis and postural causes (thoracic kyphosis, rounded shoulders). Treatment is a scapular stabilisation and posture programme.

A complementary descriptive approach grades severity by the character of the noise: a soft rubbing/grating sensation is usually bursal, whereas a loud thumping, clunking or grinding is more typical of an osseous cause and should always prompt cross-sectional imaging.

Clinical Presentation

History

  • Symptomatic crepitus - snapping, grinding, popping or thumping with shoulder/scapular movement, particularly overhead activity.
  • Pain - typically over the superomedial (and sometimes inferior) angle of the scapula; this is the feature that defines the syndrome.
  • Triggers - repetitive overhead work or sport (throwers, swimmers, painters, manual and military load-bearing tasks). According to PubMed, the condition has been highlighted in military populations because of heavy upper-limb load-bearing.
  • Onset after trauma - raises suspicion of a malunited rib/scapular fracture.

Examination

  • Reproduce the crepitus - palpate over the superomedial angle while the patient circumducts the arm; feel and listen for the snap and localise tenderness.
  • Assess scapular motion and dyskinesis - look for winging, asymmetry of scapular rhythm and posture (thoracic kyphosis, rounded shoulders).
  • Look and feel for a mass - a discrete hard lump suggests an osteochondroma or other bony lesion.
  • Examine the whole shoulder and cervical spine - to exclude glenohumeral and referred causes of pain.

Clinical Pearl

The diagnostic-and-therapeutic injection doubles as a clinical test: if infiltrating local anaesthetic into the scapulothoracic bursa abolishes the pain, the bursa is confirmed as the source and the patient is likely to respond to bursectomy. A poor response should make you reconsider the diagnosis.

Investigations

The diagnosis is primarily clinical, but imaging is used to exclude an osseous cause and plan treatment.

Investigation Strategy

ModalityRoleKey Point
Plain radiographsFirst-line; AP, lateral (Y) and tangential scapular viewsMay show osteochondroma or malunion but commonly normal; costal-surface lesions are easily missed
CT (with 3D reconstruction)Investigation of choice for bony causesBest defines osteochondroma, scapular shape, Luschka tubercle and malunion for surgical planning
MRIAssesses the bursa and soft tissuesShows bursal fluid/thickening and excludes soft-tissue tumour; complements CT
UltrasoundDynamic assessment and injection guidanceCan image the bursa in real time and guide accurate bursal injection
Diagnostic injectionConfirms pain sourceRelief after bursal local anaesthetic confirms the diagnosis and predicts surgical success

Do not miss a structural lesion

A loud mechanical noise, a palpable hard mass, or symptoms after trauma should never be dismissed as simple bursitis. Obtain a CT to exclude an osteochondroma, malunited fracture or other bony prominence - missing one means non-operative treatment and even bursectomy will fail.

Management

The cardinal principle is non-operative treatment first for soft-tissue causes, reserving surgery for refractory cases, while osseous causes are treated by resecting the lesion.

Clinical Algorithm— Snapping Scapula Management Pathway
Loading flowchart...

Non-Operative Management (first line)

  • Activity modification and NSAIDs for symptom control.
  • Structured physiotherapy - the cornerstone - focused on scapular stabilisation, periscapular strengthening, postural correction and addressing scapular dyskinesis.
  • Bursal injection of local anaesthetic and corticosteroid - therapeutic and diagnostic. According to PubMed reviews, non-operative care succeeds in a high proportion of patients (commonly quoted as up to around 80%).

Operative Management

Surgery is indicated for symptomatic patients who fail at least 6 months of compliant non-operative treatment, or up front when a discrete bony lesion is the cause.

The preferred approach for refractory soft-tissue disease. The patient is positioned prone with the arm behind the back (the "chicken-wing" position) to lift the medial border of the scapula off the chest wall. Portals are placed medial to the medial border (typically about 3cm medial, at and below the level of the scapular spine), staying medial to avoid the suprascapular nerve laterally and working in the safe interval to protect the dorsal scapular neurovascular bundle. The inflamed bursa is debrided. Advantages over open surgery are less morbidity, better cosmesis and earlier return to activity.

Often combined with bursectomy. A limited portion of the superomedial angle of the scapula is resected (commonly cited around 2-3cm) to remove the bony corner that catches and to excise the symptomatic adventitial bursa. Resection must be limited - taking too much risks detaching the levator scapulae and serratus anterior and destabilising the scapula. According to PubMed, the best surgical outcomes are reported when bursectomy is combined with partial scapulectomy.

For an osteochondroma or other discrete bony prominence, the treatment is complete excision of the lesion (open or arthroscopically/endoscopically assisted). Removing the mechanical block restores smooth gliding and typically gives excellent, durable relief. A malunited rib or scapular fracture causing the prominence is similarly addressed by removing the offending bone.

Clinical Pearl

Negative prognostic factors for surgery reported in the literature include older age, longer duration of symptoms and lower preoperative psychological scores - so careful patient selection (including a good response to diagnostic injection) matters as much as technique.

Complications

Neurovascular Injury

Dorsal scapular nerve and artery (medial border), suprascapular nerve (scapular/spinoglenoid notch) and the spinal accessory nerve (trapezius) are all at risk. Careful portal placement and limited, subperiosteal resection protect them.

Pneumothorax

The chest wall lies immediately deep to the working space. Staying subperiosteal on the costal surface and controlling fluid pressure reduces the risk of pleural breach.

Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms

A meaningful minority continue to have pain after surgery. According to PubMed, many patients report ongoing shoulder disability even after operation, and a small number need revision - reflecting how often the precise pain source is uncertain.

Scapular Instability / Winging

Over-resection of the superomedial angle can detach the levator scapulae and serratus anterior, producing winging and a destabilised scapula. Keep the bony resection limited.

Clinical Relevance

Snapping scapula syndrome is a favourite viva topic because it tests anatomical reasoning rather than memorised algorithms. The examiner wants to see that you:

  • Separate the benign from the pathological - painless crepitus needs no treatment.
  • Reason from the scapulothoracic anatomy - ribs 2-7, the bursae, the superomedial angle and the surrounding neurovascular structures.
  • Use imaging logically - CT to exclude and characterise an osseous cause.
  • Sequence treatment correctly - non-operative care and a diagnostic injection before arthroscopic bursectomy with superomedial angle resection, and lesion excision for bony causes.
  • Respect the dangers of surgery - the nerves at risk and the consequences of over-resection.

Evidence Base

Critical Review of the Evidence Base (Landmark)

IV
Warth, Spiegl, Millett. Am J Sports Med 2014
Key Findings:
  • 81 relevant articles, all low-level evidence (no RCTs)
  • Likely an underdiagnosed condition
  • Bursectomy +/- partial scapulectomy is the most effective surgery
  • Continued disability after surgery is common
Clinical Implication: Management rests on anatomical understanding and consensus rather than high-level trials. Counsel patients honestly that surgery helps most but does not reliably abolish all symptoms.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 24664139)

Arthroscopic Bursectomy - Mid-Term Outcomes

IV
Gambhir et al. JSES International 2022
Key Findings:
  • 20 patients / 24 scapulae, mean 44-month follow-up
  • VAS pain fell from 4.95 to 2.27 (significant)
  • Mean ASES 79, subjective shoulder value 83
  • Low recurrence; 2 patients required revision
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic bursectomy is a safe, reliable option giving durable pain relief with a low recurrence rate, supporting it as the surgery of choice for refractory soft-tissue disease.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 36353416)

Arthroscopic Debridement + Medial Scapulectomy with MRI Bony Parameters

IV
Zeng et al. Orthop J Sports Med 2021
Key Findings:
  • 8 patients, minimum 2-year follow-up, no complications
  • Significant improvement in OSS, UCLA, Constant and VAS
  • 5 of 8 needed additional medial scapulectomy
  • Introduced MRI bony parameters for surgical planning
Clinical Implication: Arthroscopic debridement with selective medial scapulectomy gives satisfactory mid-term results, and preoperative cross-sectional bony measurements can help decide which patients need bony resection in addition to bursectomy.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33997061)

Predictors of Outcome After Arthroscopic Treatment

V
Ernat, Millett. Arthroscopy 2020 (Editorial Commentary)
Key Findings:
  • Response to diagnostic injection guides patient selection
  • Bursectomy + partial scapulectomy gives the best outcomes
  • Negative predictors: older age, longer symptom duration
  • Lower preoperative psychological score predicts worse results
Clinical Implication: Operate selectively. A confirmatory injection response and attention to age, chronicity and psychological factors improve the chance of a good surgical outcome.
Verify on PubMed (PMID 33276885)

Exam Viva Scenarios

Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions

CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 1: Painful Crepitus in an Overhead Athlete

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 26-year-old competitive swimmer presents with 8 months of pain over the upper inner border of the right shoulder blade, with a grating sensation when she reaches overhead. She can demonstrate a soft snapping by circumducting the arm. There is tenderness over the superomedial angle of the scapula and no palpable mass. Plain radiographs are normal."

PRACTICAL APPROACH
This is a typical presentation of symptomatic scapulothoracic bursitis - snapping scapula syndrome of soft-tissue origin. The features that point to this are the superomedial pain, reproducible soft crepitus with overhead activity in an overhead athlete, tenderness at the superomedial angle and normal radiographs with no mass. I would first confirm there is no osseous cause: I would examine carefully for a hard lump and, given the chronicity, obtain a CT to exclude an osteochondroma or other bony lesion that plain films can miss. Assuming the CT is normal, I would manage her non-operatively, which succeeds in the large majority of patients. This means activity modification, a short course of NSAIDs, and most importantly a structured physiotherapy programme focused on scapular stabilisation, periscapular strengthening and postural correction. I would also offer a bursal injection of local anaesthetic and corticosteroid, which is both therapeutic and a useful diagnostic test - good relief confirms the bursa as the pain source. I would persist with conservative treatment for at least six months before considering surgery.
KEY CLINICAL POINTS
Distinguish symptomatic syndrome from incidental painless crepitus
Exclude an osseous cause with CT even when films are normal
Physiotherapy with scapular stabilisation is first-line and usually works
Bursal injection is both therapeutic and diagnostic
COMMON PITFALLS
Rushing to surgery before an adequate conservative trial
Assuming normal radiographs exclude a bony lesion
Forgetting to look and feel for a mass
Treating asymptomatic crepitus
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"What if she had a loud thumping noise and a palpable lump?"
"Which surgery would you offer if six months of therapy fails?"
"What structures are at risk during that surgery?"
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

Scenario 2: A Bony Lump and Loud Snapping

CLINICAL PROMPT

"An 18-year-old man has a loud thumping snap from the left shoulder blade for two years and notices a hard lump under the inner border. There is a firm fixed mass at the medial scapula. He has no neurological symptoms."

PRACTICAL APPROACH
A loud mechanical thump with a discrete hard mass strongly suggests an osseous cause, and in this age group the most likely lesion is an osteochondroma arising from the costal surface of the scapula, which creates a mechanical block to scapulothoracic gliding. My priority is to characterise the lesion. I would obtain plain radiographs, including tangential scapular views, but the definitive investigation is a CT with three-dimensional reconstruction, which shows the size, base and location of the lesion and is essential for surgical planning. I would consider an MRI to assess the cartilage cap and exclude any aggressive features, since a thick or growing cartilage cap raises the small possibility of malignant transformation. Because this is a structural mechanical cause, non-operative treatment will not resolve it - the definitive treatment is complete excision of the lesion, which can be done open or with endoscopic assistance, removing the bony block and restoring smooth gliding. I would warn him about the dorsal scapular and suprascapular nerves and the risk of pneumothorax given the proximity of the chest wall.
KEY CLINICAL POINTS
Loud snapping plus a hard mass equals an osseous cause until proven otherwise
Osteochondroma is the most common bony cause, typically in younger patients
CT with 3D reconstruction is the key investigation
Treatment is complete excision of the lesion, not conservative care
COMMON PITFALLS
Labelling a structural lesion as simple bursitis and prescribing physiotherapy
Forgetting to assess the cartilage cap for malignant change
Inadequate (incomplete) excision leaving residual mechanical block
Ignoring the neurovascular and pleural risks of surgery
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"What features would make you worried about malignant transformation?"
"How does the surgical approach differ from a bursectomy for bursitis?"
"What if he had multiple lesions elsewhere?"
CLINICAL SCENARIOAdvanced

Scenario 3: Failed Conservative Treatment

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A 40-year-old painter has had painful scapulothoracic crepitus for over a year. He has completed nine months of supervised physiotherapy and had two bursal injections that each gave several weeks of complete relief. CT shows no bony lesion. He wants definitive treatment. How will you proceed?"

PRACTICAL APPROACH
This patient is a good surgical candidate. He has genuinely failed an adequate, supervised non-operative programme, his CT excludes a bony cause, and crucially his bursal injections gave good temporary relief, which both confirms the scapulothoracic space as the pain source and predicts a favourable response to surgery. The procedure I would offer is arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy, and given the literature suggesting the best outcomes come from combining bursectomy with a limited partial scapulectomy, I would also resect the superomedial angle of the scapula. I would position him prone with the arm behind the back to lift the medial border off the chest wall, place portals medial to the medial border at and below the scapular spine to stay away from the suprascapular nerve, debride the bursa and perform a limited resection of the superomedial corner. I would keep the bony resection conservative to avoid detaching the levator scapulae and serratus anterior, and stay subperiosteal to protect the dorsal scapular neurovascular bundle and avoid pneumothorax. I would counsel him that while most patients get good relief with low recurrence, a minority have persistent symptoms and a small number need revision.
KEY CLINICAL POINTS
Good injection response is a strong positive predictor for surgery
Arthroscopic bursectomy with superomedial angle resection is the procedure of choice
Prone arm-behind-back positioning and medial portals protect key nerves
Limit bony resection to preserve muscle attachments and scapular stability
COMMON PITFALLS
Over-resecting the superomedial angle and causing winging
Placing portals too laterally and risking the suprascapular nerve
Promising complete resolution of all symptoms
Operating despite a poor injection response without reconsidering the diagnosis
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"How much of the superomedial angle is safe to resect?"
"What are the advantages of arthroscopic over open surgery?"
"What would you do if he had persistent pain after surgery?"

Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice

There are no formal national guidelines or arthroplasty-registry data for snapping scapula syndrome - it is an uncommon condition managed on the basis of small case series, technique papers and expert consensus. The points below summarise the consistent themes from the global literature.

Consensus Themes Across the Literature

ThemeConsensus PositionEvidence Strength
Symptomatic definitionTreat only painful crepitus; painless snapping is usually normalStrong consensus
First-line treatmentNon-operative care (scapular stabilisation, posture, injection) for at least 6 monthsConsensus, up to ~80% success quoted
Imaging for bony causeCT is the investigation of choice to exclude/characterise osseous lesionsStrong consensus
Surgery of choiceArthroscopic bursectomy +/- partial (superomedial angle) scapulectomyLow-level (Level IV) evidence, consistent results
Osseous causesExcise the offending lesion (e.g. osteochondroma)Case-series consensus
Evidence quality overallNo randomised trials exist; all recommendations are low-levelAcknowledged limitation

Global practice variation: the condition features in military and heavy-labour populations worldwide because of repetitive upper-limb load-bearing. Open surgery remains an option where arthroscopic scapulothoracic expertise or equipment is limited, but the international trend - reported from North American, European, Brazilian and Asian series - favours the arthroscopic approach for its lower morbidity, better cosmesis and earlier return to activity.

Snapping Scapula Syndrome - Exam Day Cheat Sheet

Clinical summary

Definition & Anatomy

  • •Painful crepitus of the scapulothoracic articulation (painless snapping is usually normal)
  • •Scapula glides over ribs 2-7; superomedial angle is the key trouble spot
  • •Major bursae: infraserratus and supraserratus; adventitial bursae at the angles
  • •Scapulothoracic rhythm contributes ~1/3 of shoulder elevation

Causes (SNAP)

  • •Soft-tissue: bursitis, muscle atrophy/fibrosis, overuse
  • •Osteochondroma - most common osseous cause
  • •Anatomy: Luschka tubercle, abnormal scapular curvature
  • •Prior fracture malunion (rib or scapula)

Investigations

  • •Plain films first (often normal; costal lesions easily missed)
  • •CT with 3D reconstruction = investigation of choice for bony causes
  • •MRI for bursa/soft tissue; ultrasound for dynamic assessment and injection
  • •Diagnostic bursal injection confirms the pain source

Management

  • •Non-operative first: scapular stabilisation, posture, NSAIDs, injection (up to ~80% success)
  • •At least 6 months conservative trial before surgery
  • •Surgery of choice: arthroscopic bursectomy +/- superomedial angle resection
  • •Osseous cause: excise the lesion (e.g. osteochondroma)

Surgical Safety

  • •At risk: dorsal scapular nerve/artery, suprascapular nerve, spinal accessory nerve
  • •Stay subperiosteal to avoid pneumothorax
  • •Limit superomedial resection (~2-3cm) to protect levator scapulae/serratus anterior
  • •Good injection response predicts better surgical outcome
Editorially reviewed — transparent references and correction processPublished by OrthoVellum Medical Education TeamEditorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Study Focus
Estimated read85 min

Decision sections

Related Topics

Bipartite Patella

Chronic Ankle Instability

Distal Biceps Rupture

External Impingement of the Shoulder