Creep | Stress Relaxation | Hysteresis | Rate-Dependent
- Viscoelasticity = Time-dependent mechanical behavior combining viscous and elastic properties
- Creep = Progressive deformation under constant load
- Stress relaxation = Force decreases at constant deformation
- Hysteresis = Energy lost as heat during loading-unloading cycles
- Strain-rate sensitivity = Stiffer and stronger at higher loading rates
- “All biological tissues are viscoelastic
- “Ligaments, tendons, and intervertebral discs exhibit strong viscoelastic behavior
- “Creep explains loss of fracture reduction over time
- “Stress relaxation explains why initial cast tension decreases
Progressive increase in deformation under constant load. Example: Disc height decreases throughout the day. Scoliosis brace applies constant force causing gradual correction.
Progressive decrease in force at constant deformation. Example: Cast becomes loose as swelling subsides. Initial graft tension decreases over time.
Energy dissipation as heat during loading-unloading cycles. Loading and unloading curves do not overlap. Area between curves = energy lost. Protective mechanism in tissues.
Materials are stiffer and stronger at higher loading rates. High-energy trauma causes different injury patterns. Explains why impact testing differs from static testing.
At a Glance
Viscoelasticity describes time-dependent mechanical behavior combining both viscous (fluid-like) and elastic (solid-like) properties, exhibited by all biological tissues. Four key phenomena: Creep (progressive deformation under constant load—explains disc height loss throughout the day and loss of fracture reduction), Stress relaxation (force decreases at constant deformation—explains why cast tension decreases over time), Hysteresis (energy dissipated as heat during loading-unloading cycles—area between curves represents lost energy), and Strain-rate sensitivity (materials are stiffer and stronger at higher loading rates—explains different injury patterns in high vs low energy trauma). Mechanical models include Maxwell (spring-dashpot in series, models relaxation), Kelvin-Voigt (parallel, models creep), and Standard Linear Solid (combined).
CRHSViscoelastic Phenomena
Hook:CRHS = The four key viscoelastic behaviors all tissues show!
MKSViscoelastic Models
Hook:MKS models = Maxwell Series, Kelvin parallel, Standard combined!
DISCClinical Examples
Hook:DISC = Clinical examples where viscoelasticity matters!
Overview
Viscoelasticity describes time-dependent mechanical behavior that combines characteristics of both viscous fluids and elastic solids. Unlike purely elastic materials that immediately return to their original shape when unloaded, viscoelastic materials exhibit time-dependent strain and stress responses.
Definition
Viscoelastic materials exhibit both elastic and viscous behavior. The elastic component stores energy and provides immediate reversible deformation. The viscous component dissipates energy and causes time-dependent irreversible flow. All biological tissues demonstrate viscoelastic properties.
Clinical Significance
Understanding viscoelasticity is essential in orthopaedics because all biological tissues behave viscoelastically. This affects how tissues respond to loading, how implants interact with tissues, and how injuries occur. Viscoelastic properties determine tissue response to both physiological and traumatic loads.
Principles and Mechanisms
Elastic vs Viscous vs Viscoelastic
Elastic materials (ideal solid) obey Hooke's Law. Stress is proportional to strain. Deformation is instantaneous and completely reversible. Energy is stored. There is no time dependence.
Viscous materials (ideal fluid) obey Newton's law of viscosity. Stress is proportional to strain rate. Deformation is permanent. Energy is dissipated as heat. Behavior is rate-dependent.
Viscoelastic materials combine both behaviors. Response depends on both strain magnitude and strain rate. Deformation has immediate and time-dependent components. Some energy is stored, some is dissipated.
Time-Dependent Behavior
Viscoelastic behavior manifests in several ways. The response to loading depends on how fast the load is applied. The material continues to deform even after the load stops changing. When held at constant deformation, the force required decreases over time.
Temperature Dependence
Viscoelastic properties are temperature-dependent. Higher temperatures increase viscous behavior. Lower temperatures increase elastic behavior. This is relevant for cryopreserved tissues and temperature effects on implants.
Key Viscoelastic Phenomena
Creep
Definition: Progressive increase in deformation under constant load over time.
Mechanism: The viscous component allows continued deformation even though load remains constant. Initially rapid, then slows asymptotically toward equilibrium.
Clinical Examples:
- Intervertebral disc height decreases during the day under body weight
- Fracture reduction may be lost over time in cast or external fixator
- Scoliosis bracing applies constant force causing gradual correction
- Total disc replacement devices may subside into endplates
- Ligament grafts elongate under constant tension
Three Phases of Creep:
- Primary creep: Rapid initial deformation, decreasing rate
- Secondary creep: Constant steady-state deformation rate
- Tertiary creep: Accelerating deformation leading to failure
Stress Relaxation
Definition: Progressive decrease in force required to maintain constant deformation over time.
Mechanism: At constant strain, internal stresses redistribute and decrease. The viscous component allows molecular rearrangement.
Clinical Examples:
- Casts become loose as initial swelling subsides and tissues relax
- Fracture reduction maintained by ligamentotaxis loses tension over time
- ACL graft initial tension decreases requiring retensioning
- Circular external fixator wires lose tension over days
- Compression plates lose some compression over weeks
Time Course: Exponential decay. Most relaxation occurs in first minutes to hours. Continues at slower rate for days to weeks.
Hysteresis
Definition: Energy dissipation when a material is loaded and then unloaded. The loading and unloading curves do not overlap.
Mechanism: Energy absorbed during loading is not completely recovered during unloading. The difference is dissipated as heat. Area between loading and unloading curves represents lost energy.
Clinical Significance:
- Protective mechanism - tissues absorb impact energy
- Ligaments and intervertebral discs show significant hysteresis
- Repeated loading causes cumulative energy dissipation
- May contribute to tissue heating during repetitive loading
- Affects damping of vibrations and impacts
Measurement: Hysteresis loop area on stress-strain curve. Larger area means more energy dissipation.
Strain-Rate Sensitivity
Definition: Mechanical properties depend on the rate at which load is applied.
Behavior: Materials are stiffer and stronger at higher strain rates. They are more compliant at lower rates.
Mechanism: At high rates, viscous component has less time to flow. Material behaves more elastically. At low rates, viscous flow contributes more.
Clinical Examples:
- Bone is stronger and fails more brittly in high-energy trauma
- Ligament tears in sports occur at higher loads than in clinical testing
- Dashboard injuries differ from gradual compression injuries
- Impact testing gives different results than quasi-static testing
Testing Implications: Static tests underestimate tissue strength during dynamic activities. Physiological loading rates should be used when testing.
Mathematical Models
Maxwell Model
Structure: Spring (elastic element) and dashpot (viscous element) connected in series.
Behavior: Models stress relaxation well. Predicts instantaneous elastic deformation followed by continued viscous flow under constant load. Under constant strain, stress decreases exponentially.
Equation: Relaxation time equals viscosity divided by elastic modulus.
Limitation: Does not model creep accurately. Predicts infinite deformation under constant load.
Kelvin-Voigt Model
Structure: Spring and dashpot connected in parallel.
Behavior: Models creep well. Predicts gradual deformation under constant load reaching equilibrium. Cannot model stress relaxation.
Response: Delayed elastic response. Deformation is time-dependent but ultimately reaches elastic equilibrium value.
Limitation: Predicts no instantaneous deformation, which is unrealistic. Does not model stress relaxation.
Standard Linear Solid Model
Structure: Combination of Maxwell and Kelvin-Voigt elements. Three-parameter model.
Behavior: Models both creep and stress relaxation. Most realistic simple model for biological tissues.
Response: Instantaneous elastic response, followed by time-dependent viscoelastic response, approaching equilibrium.
Application: Better approximates actual tissue behavior. Used in finite element modeling.
More Complex Models
Generalized Maxwell: Multiple Maxwell elements in parallel. Better fits stress relaxation data.
Generalized Kelvin-Voigt: Multiple Kelvin-Voigt elements in series. Better fits creep data.
Quasi-linear Viscoelasticity: Advanced model for soft tissues proposed by Fung. Separates time-dependent and strain-dependent responses.
Tissue Composition and Viscoelasticity
Tissue Components
Solid Phase:
- Collagen fibers (structural framework)
- Proteoglycans (hydration, resistance)
- Elastin (elastic recoil)
Fluid Phase:
- Interstitial water (60-80% of tissue)
- Fluid flow through matrix
- Contributes to viscous behavior
| Tissue | Water Content | Viscoelasticity |
|---|---|---|
| Articular cartilage | 60-80% | High (biphasic) |
| Intervertebral disc | 70-90% | Very high |
| Ligament | 60-70% | Moderate-high |
| Bone | 10-20% | Low-moderate |
Classification of Viscoelastic Behavior
By Phenomenon
Four Key Types (CRHS):
| Phenomenon | Definition | Clinical Example |
|---|---|---|
| Creep | Constant load, increasing deformation | Disc height loss during day |
| Relaxation | Constant deformation, decreasing force | Cast loosening over time |
| Hysteresis | Energy loss in loading cycles | Shock absorption |
| Strain-rate | Rate-dependent properties | High-energy fracture patterns |
Clinical Applications in Orthopaedics
Bone
Viscoelastic Properties: Bone is moderately viscoelastic. More viscous when wet. Shows strain-rate sensitivity.
Creep: Minimal compared to soft tissues. Relevant in long-term loading scenarios.
Rate Effects: Much stronger and stiffer at impact rates. Fails more brittly in high-energy trauma. Cortical bone Young's modulus increases approximately thirty percent at physiological strain rates compared to quasi-static loading.
Clinical Relevance: High-energy fractures have more comminution. Bone density measurement may vary with loading rate.
Articular Cartilage
Viscoelastic Properties: Highly viscoelastic due to fluid flow through solid matrix. Biphasic model required (solid matrix plus fluid).
Creep: Fluid exudes under constant load. Cartilage thickness decreases with sustained loading. Recovery occurs when load removed.
Clinical Relevance: Joint loading patterns affect cartilage health. Cyclic loading may be protective. Prolonged static loading may be harmful.
Ligaments and Tendons
Viscoelastic Properties: Strongly viscoelastic. Exhibit all four key phenomena (creep, stress relaxation, hysteresis, rate-dependence).
Creep: ACL grafts elongate over time under constant tension. May contribute to residual laxity after reconstruction.
Stress Relaxation: Initial graft tension decreases. Surgeons may retension grafts or account for expected relaxation.
Rate Effects: Ligaments fail at higher loads when loaded rapidly. Low-rate testing underestimates functional strength.
Hysteresis: Energy dissipation protects joint during impact. Repeated loading causes progressive damage.
Preconditioning: Cyclical loading stabilizes viscoelastic response. Done before mechanical testing to obtain reproducible results.
Intervertebral Disc
Viscoelastic Properties: Highly viscoelastic. Fluid movement through nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus.
Creep: Disc height decreases during day due to fluid exudation under body weight loading. Height recovers overnight when unloaded in recumbent position. Young adults may lose up to twenty millimeters of height during a typical day.
Stress Relaxation: Intradiscal pressure decreases when spine held in fixed position.
Clinical Relevance: Diurnal variation affects spinal mechanics. Morning stiffness relates to overnight fluid accumulation. Disc degeneration alters viscoelastic properties.
Meniscus
Viscoelastic Properties: Moderately viscoelastic. Collagen fiber orientation affects behavior.
Role in Load Distribution: Viscoelastic damping absorbs impact. Protects articular cartilage from shock loading.
Effect of Injury: Meniscal tears alter viscoelastic properties. Meniscectomy removes shock-absorbing function.
Clinical Implications
Fracture Fixation
Creep of Fracture Reduction: Fracture alignment maintained by cast or external fixator may worsen over time due to creep of soft tissues. Serial radiographs monitor for loss of reduction.
Plate Relaxation: Compression plates lose some compression force over weeks. Dynamic compression continues as bone resorbs and remodels.
Wire Tension Loss: External fixator wires and circular frame wires lose tension. May require retensioning.
Ligament Reconstruction
Graft Tensioning: Initial tension applied during ACL reconstruction decreases due to stress relaxation. Some surgeons pretension grafts cyclically. Others account for expected relaxation.
Graft Elongation: Viscoelastic creep may contribute to residual laxity after reconstruction. Proper initial tension important.
Spinal Biomechanics
Disc Loading: Viscoelastic properties of disc allow load sharing with facets over time. Affects intradiscal pressure measurements.
Spinal Instrumentation: Viscoelastic settling affects construct behavior. Loss of disc height after fusion affects adjacent segments.
Arthroplasty
Polyethylene Creep: Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene is viscoelastic. Creep contributes to deformation and wear. Highly crosslinked polyethylene reduces creep.
Soft Tissue Balancing: Ligament stress relaxation affects stability. Initial tight soft tissue balance may loosen.
Injury Biomechanics
Loading Rate Effect: High-energy trauma produces different injury patterns than low-energy trauma. Bone fragments differ. Soft tissue damage differs.
Energy Absorption: Viscoelastic tissues absorb impact energy through hysteresis. Protects deeper structures.
Testing and Measurement
Creep Test
Protocol: Apply constant load. Measure deformation over time. Plot strain versus time.
Result: Creep curve showing primary, secondary, and sometimes tertiary creep.
Parameters Measured: Initial elastic strain, time-dependent strain, creep rate, equilibrium strain.
Stress Relaxation Test
Protocol: Apply constant deformation. Measure force over time. Plot stress versus time.
Result: Exponential decay curve.
Parameters Measured: Initial stress, relaxation time constant, equilibrium stress.
Hysteresis Measurement
Protocol: Cyclically load and unload specimen. Plot stress versus strain for complete cycle.
Result: Hysteresis loop. Loading curve above unloading curve.
Parameters Measured: Area of hysteresis loop (energy dissipated), loop width.
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis
Protocol: Apply sinusoidal oscillating load. Measure resulting strain.
Result: Storage modulus (elastic component), loss modulus (viscous component), phase lag.
Application: Characterizes frequency-dependent viscoelastic properties.
Differentiating the Viscoelastic Phenomena
The commonest exam error is confusing the four phenomena, or confusing viscoelastic creep with plastic deformation. Use the controlled variable to tell them apart.
| Behaviour | Controlled (held constant) | What changes | Reversible? | Distinguishing clinical clue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creep | Load | Deformation increases over time | Yes (recovers when unloaded) | Disc/stature shortens through the day, recovers overnight |
| Stress relaxation | Deformation (strain) | Force/stress decays over time | Partly | Cast or graft tension falls though limb girth unchanged |
| Hysteresis | Cyclic load-unload | Energy lost between curves | Energy not recovered | Shock absorption; loop shrinks with preconditioning |
| Strain-rate sensitivity | Nothing (rate varies) | Stiffness/strength rise with rate | Elastic at any single rate | High-energy trauma = comminution |
| Plastic deformation | Load beyond yield | Permanent deformation | No (irreversible) | Implant bending, bone fails past yield point |
| Fatigue | Repeated sub-yield cycles | Cumulative microdamage | No | Stress fracture, implant fatigue failure |
Creep and stress relaxation are viscoelastic and largely recoverable (the disc rehydrates overnight; a relaxed graft is not torn). Plastic deformation and fatigue are permanent. In a viva, always state whether load or deformation is the controlled variable, and whether the change is recoverable.
Controversies & Areas of Uncertainty
-
How strain-rate-sensitive are ligaments, really? The classic teaching that tissues are markedly stronger at high rates is well established for bone (Carter and Hayes, 1977) but weaker for ligament. Dorlot et al (1980) found canine ACL behaviour essentially insensitive to strain rate across 0.12 to 220 percent per second, and human studies show only modest effects within physiologic rates. The dramatic rate effects appear mainly at extreme impact rates and at the bone-ligament junction (avulsion vs mid-substance failure shifting with rate).
-
Is cartilage time-dependence "viscoelasticity" or fluid flow? Biphasic theory (Mak/Lai/Mow, 1987; Setton/Zhu/Mow, 1993) shows cartilage creep is dominated by flow-dependent drag of interstitial fluid through a porous matrix, not intrinsic solid-matrix viscoelasticity. Lumping both as "viscoelastic" is a simplification examiners may probe.
-
Disc vs vertebra in spinal creep. It is widely taught that the disc drives diurnal height loss, but Pollintine et al (2010) showed vertebral bodies deform more elastically and that the disc contributes only about half of creep, with the balance from vertebrae and neural-arch impaction.
-
Does graft pretensioning actually improve outcomes? Cyclic pretensioning reduces in-vitro stress relaxation, but high-quality clinical evidence that it lowers residual laxity or improves patient-reported outcomes after ACL reconstruction remains limited and inconsistent.
-
Polyethylene creep vs wear. Early polyethylene penetration on radiographs reflects a mix of creep ("bedding-in") and true wear; separating the two is non-trivial and affects how early radiographic penetration is interpreted (Williams et al, 2003).
Evidence Base
All primary research below was verified against PubMed. Foundational textbooks (Fung's Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, Springer; Lakes' Viscoelastic Materials, Cambridge University Press) remain the standard references for quasi-linear viscoelastic theory and the spring-dashpot models, and are cited as Guideline-level core texts.
- Trabecular bone tested over strain rates of 0.001 to 10 per second
- Both strength and modulus were proportional to strain rate raised to the 0.06 power
- Strength proportional to the square, and modulus to the cube, of apparent density
- Marrow enhanced properties only at the highest strain rate via restricted viscous flow
- Derived the biphasic (KLM) solution for indentation creep and stress relaxation of cartilage
- Instantaneous response governed by the solid-matrix shear modulus (behaves incompressible at t=0)
- Transient creep and relaxation controlled by frictional drag of interstitial fluid flow (inversely proportional to permeability)
- Allows intrinsic material properties to be extracted from indentation tests
- Confined-compression creep of bovine osteochondral plugs with and without the surface zone
- In intact cartilage, flow-dependent mechanisms (frictional drag plus fluid pressurization) alone described creep
- Surface removal increased permeability and creep rate, shifting load support onto the solid matrix
- The articular surface maintains low permeability to sustain interstitial fluid pressurization
- 117 cadaveric thoracolumbar motion segments creep-loaded at 1 kN for up to 2 hours
- The disc contributed 51 percent of creep deformation; vertebral bodies showed greater elastic deformation
- Total 2-hour compressive deformation averaged 2.24 mm and rarely exceeded 3 mm
- Creep increased with age as intradiscal pressure fell with disc degeneration
- Human cadaveric ACL subunits failed in tension at a constant strain rate of 100 percent per second
- Anterior bundles stiffer and stronger (modulus 284 vs 155 MPa; max stress 38 vs 15 MPa) than posterior
- Strain energy density to maximum stress was higher in anterior bundles
- Regional heterogeneity is relevant to graft selection and reconstruction
- 38 canine ACLs tested over strain rates from 0.12 to 220 percent per second
- Mechanical behavior was NOT sensitive to strain rate within the physiologic range tested
- Reversible (elastic) range limited to about 14 percent elongation (around 200 N)
- Freezing stiffened the ligament; behavior was stable from room temperature to 45 C
- Rabbit MCL-bone complexes tested fresh versus after 1.5 to 3 months frozen at minus 20 C
- Cyclic stress relaxation and load-deformation behavior were unchanged by careful freezing
- Hysteresis area was significantly reduced only in the first few loading cycles
- Supports controlled freezing for storage of test specimens
- Hip simulator study of ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings with swing-phase microseparation
- Microseparation locally deformed the polyethylene rim, attributed to creep
- Crosslinked PE volume change fell from 25.6 to 5.6 mm3 per million cycles under microseparation
- Polyethylene creep and viscoelastic deformation influence bearing wear behavior
Exam Viva Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“What is viscoelasticity and how is it relevant to orthopaedic tissues?”
“Explain the difference between creep and stress relaxation with clinical examples.”
“How does strain-rate sensitivity affect injury patterns in high-energy versus low-energy trauma?”
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What is creep in viscoelastic materials? A: Progressive increase in deformation under constant load. Example: disc height decreases during the day under body weight.
Q: What is stress relaxation? A: Progressive decrease in force required to maintain constant deformation. Example: casts become loose as tissues relax.
Q: What does hysteresis represent? A: Energy dissipation during loading-unloading cycles. Area between loading and unloading curves represents energy lost as heat.
Q: What does the Maxwell viscoelastic model consist of? A: Spring and dashpot in series. Models stress relaxation behavior well.
Q: What does the Kelvin-Voigt model consist of? A: Spring and dashpot in parallel. Models creep behavior well.
Q: How do materials behave at higher strain rates? A: Stiffer and stronger. High-energy trauma produces more comminuted fractures because bone is stronger but more brittle at impact rates.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Viscoelasticity is a basic-science principle rather than a disease, so there are no disease-specific society guidelines. Its translation into practice runs through implant-testing standards, registry-derived wear/loosening data, and curriculum frameworks that are shared worldwide.
Standards and Testing Frameworks
- Relevance to viscoelasticity
- Hip and bearing wear simulation; explicitly separates creep ("bedding-in") from true wear in polyethylene volume loss
- Relevance to viscoelasticity
- Knee wear simulation; early polyethylene deformation is dominated by creep before steady-state wear
- Relevance to viscoelasticity
- Characterisation and specification of UHMWPE and highly-crosslinked PE, the principal viscoelastic implant material
- Relevance to viscoelasticity
- Fracture-fixation teaching that compression and reduction are partly lost to soft-tissue and implant stress relaxation over time
Registry Signals
Arthroplasty registries do not measure viscoelasticity directly, but its consequences appear as outcomes. The NJR (UK), AOANJRR (Australia), AJRR (US) and SHAR/Swedish registries consistently show lower revision for wear/osteolysis with highly-crosslinked polyethylene than with conventional UHMWPE, consistent with reduced creep and wear of crosslinked material. Registry data therefore serve as the large-scale clinical correlate of the bench creep findings (Williams et al, 2003).
High- vs Limited-Resource Practice
- Practical handling of viscoelastic effects
- Crosslinked/vitamin-E PE to limit creep; cyclic graft pretensioning; serial imaging and protocolised wire retensioning; finite-element models incorporating viscoelastic constitutive laws
- Practical handling of viscoelastic effects
- Conventional UHMWPE more common (greater creep over time); reliance on clinical and plain-radiograph surveillance; deliberate slight over-reduction and scheduled cast/wire checks to offset settling
Education: Viscoelasticity is core basic-science curriculum across FRCS (Tr & Orth), FRACS, EBOT/FEBOT, ABOS and DNB/MS/MCh examinations, where candidates are expected to define creep, stress relaxation, hysteresis and rate-dependence and apply them to fixation, grafting and bearing surfaces.
Management Algorithm

Core Concepts
- Time-dependent behavior combining elastic and viscous properties
- All biological tissues are viscoelastic
- Four key phenomena: CRHS mnemonic
- Temperature-dependent behavior
Creep
- Constant load → increasing deformation
- Example: disc height loss during day
- Example: fracture reduction loss in cast
- Three phases: primary, secondary, tertiary
Stress Relaxation
- Constant deformation → decreasing force
- Example: cast becomes loose over time
- Example: ACL graft loses initial tension
- Exponential decay with time
Hysteresis
- Energy dissipation in loading cycles
- Loading and unloading curves differ
- Area between curves = lost energy
- Protective impact absorption
Strain-Rate Sensitivity
- Higher rates → stiffer and stronger
- High-energy trauma causes comminution
- Static testing underestimates dynamic strength
- Physiological rates needed for testing
Mathematical Models
- Maxwell (series): stress relaxation
- Kelvin-Voigt (parallel): creep
- Standard Linear Solid: both behaviors
- QLV for soft tissues (Fung)
Clinical Applications
- Bone: moderate viscoelasticity, rate-sensitive
- Ligaments: strong viscoelasticity, all phenomena
- Disc: highly viscoelastic, diurnal variation
- Cartilage: biphasic, fluid flow effects
Key Numbers
- Disc height: up to 20mm loss per day
- Bone modulus: ~30% higher at impact rates
- Wire tension: decreases over days-weeks
- Preconditioning: stabilizes tissue response