Rim Fracture-Dislocation | Volar vs Dorsal | Carpal Subluxation
- Fracture-subluxation - the carpus subluxates with the rim fragment (key distinguishing feature)
- Volar Barton = Thomas Type II Smith fracture - overlapping classification
- Shear mechanism - axial load with wrist in flexion (volar) or extension (dorsal)
- Always unstable - casting fails, surgery required for all displaced fractures
- Buttress plating - plate prevents fragment and carpus from displacing
- “Barton = rim fracture WITH carpal subluxation (vs die-punch = articular depression)
- “Volar Barton is more common than dorsal Barton
- “Match plate to fracture side - volar plate for volar Barton, dorsal for dorsal
- “Anatomic reduction of articular surface is critical - greater than 2mm step predicts arthritis
CRITICAL EXAM DISTINCTION: Barton = rim fracture with subluxation. Smith = extra-articular with volar angulation. Colles = extra-articular with dorsal angulation. Barton is INTRA-ARTICULAR by definition.
Volar Barton: Volar rim fracture, carpus subluxates volarly. More common. Same as Thomas Type II Smith. Dorsal Barton: Dorsal rim fracture, carpus subluxates dorsally. Less common. Also called "reverse Barton."
The rim fragment remains attached to the radiocarpal ligaments. When the rim fractures, the entire carpus can subluxate along with it. The intact rim acts as a ramp. No cast can prevent this displacement.
The plate must be placed on the same side as the fracture to provide a buttress effect. Volar Barton = volar plate. Dorsal Barton = dorsal plate. The plate physically blocks fragment displacement.
- Key Feature
- Volar rim fracture-subluxation
- Articular
- Yes - volar rim
- Carpal Position
- Volar subluxation
- Key Feature
- Dorsal rim fracture-subluxation
- Articular
- Yes - dorsal rim
- Carpal Position
- Dorsal subluxation
- Key Feature
- Same as volar Barton
- Articular
- Yes - volar rim
- Carpal Position
- Volar subluxation
- Key Feature
- Volar angulation, extra-articular
- Articular
- No
- Carpal Position
- Neutral
- Key Feature
- Dorsal angulation, extra-articular
- Articular
- Usually no
- Carpal Position
- Neutral
- Key Feature
- Articular depression (lunate fossa)
- Articular
- Yes - central
- Carpal Position
- Neutral
- Key Feature
- Radial styloid fracture
- Articular
- Yes - lateral
- Carpal Position
- Neutral
BARTONBARTON - Key Features
Hook:BARTON = Buttress plate for Articular Rim fracture where carpus and fragment go Together, requiring Operative management with No casting
VDVD - Volar vs Dorsal Barton
Hook:The fracture and subluxation are on the SAME SIDE - Volar goes Volar, Dorsal goes Dorsal
SHEARSHEAR - Mechanism
Hook:SHEAR force creates the rim fracture - hand position determines volar vs dorsal
Overview and Epidemiology
Barton's fracture is a fracture-dislocation of the distal radius involving the volar or dorsal articular rim with associated carpal subluxation. It was first described by Irish surgeon John Rhea Barton in 1838.
The carpus subluxates WITH the fractured rim fragment. This distinguishes Barton's fracture from other distal radius fractures. The radiocarpal ligaments remain attached to the rim fragment, so when the rim fractures, the ligaments pull the entire carpus along with the fragment.
- Volar Barton: Volar rim fracture with volar carpal subluxation (more common)
- Dorsal Barton: Dorsal rim fracture with dorsal carpal subluxation (less common)
- Reverse Barton: Alternative historical name for dorsal Barton
- Thomas Type II Smith: Synonymous with volar Barton
- Accounts for 5-10% of distal radius fractures
- Volar Barton is approximately 3 times more common than dorsal Barton
- Peak incidence in young adults (20-40 years) from high-energy trauma
- Also seen in elderly with osteoporosis from low-energy falls
- No significant gender predominance
- Volar Barton: Axial load with wrist in flexion - shears off volar rim
- Dorsal Barton: Axial load with wrist in extension - shears off dorsal rim
- High-energy: falls from height, motor vehicle accidents, sports injuries
- Low-energy: simple falls in osteoporotic bone
John Rhea Barton (1794-1871) was an American surgeon at Pennsylvania Hospital who described this fracture pattern in 1838. He also invented the Barton bandage and performed the first hip arthroplasty (interposition arthroplasty for hip ankylosis in 1826).
Anatomy and Pathophysiology
Distal radius articular anatomy:
The distal radius has two distinct articular rims:
- Volar rim: Stronger, with attachment of volar radiocarpal ligaments
- Dorsal rim: Thinner, with attachment of dorsal radiocarpal ligaments
- Radioscaphocapitate ligament
- Long radiolunate ligament
- Short radiolunate ligament
- Radioscapholunate ligament
- Dorsal radiocarpal ligament
- Dorsal intercarpal ligament
When the rim fractures, the radiocarpal ligaments remain attached to the fragment. These ligaments connect to the proximal carpal row. Therefore, when the rim displaces, the entire carpus subluxates with it. The intact portion of the radius cannot prevent this because there is no bony block - the rim fragment acts as a "ramp" allowing the carpus to slide off.
- Axial load applied with wrist in flexion
- Shear force concentrates at volar rim
- Volar rim fractures (oblique fracture line)
- Volar radiocarpal ligaments pull carpus volarly
- Carpus subluxates volarly with fragment
- Axial load applied with wrist in extension
- Shear force concentrates at dorsal rim
- Dorsal rim fractures
- Dorsal radiocarpal ligaments pull carpus dorsally
- Carpus subluxates dorsally with fragment
The key biomechanical principle is that the carpus and rim fragment move as a single unit due to the intact ligamentous connections.
Classification Systems

Primary Classification by Rim Involved:
- Rim
- Volar
- Subluxation
- Volar
- Mechanism
- Flexion + axial load
- Frequency
- More common (75%)
- Rim
- Dorsal
- Subluxation
- Dorsal
- Mechanism
- Extension + axial load
- Frequency
- Less common (25%)
The classification is straightforward - identify which rim is fractured and confirm carpal subluxation in the same direction.
Volar Barton and Thomas Type II Smith fracture describe the same injury - a volar rim fracture-subluxation. The Thomas classification for Smith fractures includes Type II as an intra-articular variant, which is identical to volar Barton.
Clinical Assessment
History:
- Mechanism (fall, position of wrist at impact)
- Energy level (high-energy vs low-energy)
- Hand dominance
- Occupation and functional demands
- Previous wrist injuries
- Medical comorbidities
Physical examination:
- Volar Barton
- Volar prominence, wrist appears flexed
- Dorsal Barton
- Dorsal prominence, wrist appears extended
- Volar Barton
- Predominantly volar
- Dorsal Barton
- Predominantly dorsal
- Volar Barton
- Volar distal radius
- Dorsal Barton
- Dorsal distal radius
- Volar Barton
- Median nerve (volar)
- Dorsal Barton
- PIN/radial sensory (dorsal)
- Volar Barton
- Volarly subluxated
- Dorsal Barton
- Dorsally subluxated
Neurovascular assessment:
- Median nerve: Most at risk with volar Barton
- Sensation: thumb, index, middle finger palmar surface
- Motor: abductor pollicis brevis (opposition weakness)
- Acute carpal tunnel may develop
- Ulnar nerve: Assess if medial displacement
- Radial artery: Palpate at wrist
- Capillary refill: All digits
The presence of carpal subluxation is the defining feature that distinguishes Barton's from other distal radius fractures. On examination, the carpus will be displaced in the same direction as the rim fracture. This must be confirmed on lateral radiograph.
Associated injuries to assess:
- DRUJ instability (piano key sign after reduction)
- TFCC injury
- Scapholunate ligament injury
- Ulnar styloid fracture
- Carpal fractures
Differential diagnosis:
- Discriminating feature
- Volar rim fragment WITH volar carpal subluxation
- Articular
- Yes (rim)
- Carpal relationship
- Subluxated volarly with fragment
- Key pitfall
- Treating as simple Smith and casting
- Discriminating feature
- Dorsal rim fragment WITH dorsal carpal subluxation
- Articular
- Yes (rim)
- Carpal relationship
- Subluxated dorsally with fragment
- Key pitfall
- Using a volar plate (cannot buttress dorsal rim)
- Discriminating feature
- Frank dislocation, radiocarpal ligament rupture, both styloids fractured
- Articular
- Variable
- Carpal relationship
- Dislocated (not just subluxed)
- Key pitfall
- Mistaking high-energy dislocation for a benign rim fracture
- Discriminating feature
- Volar angulation, extra-articular
- Articular
- No
- Carpal relationship
- Normal (carpus follows shaft)
- Key pitfall
- Calling any volar injury a Barton's
- Discriminating feature
- Dorsal angulation, dinner-fork deformity
- Articular
- Usually no
- Carpal relationship
- Normal
- Key pitfall
- Overlooking volar lip on lateral view
- Discriminating feature
- Central lunate-fossa articular depression
- Articular
- Yes (central)
- Carpal relationship
- Normal
- Key pitfall
- Confusing impaction with rim shear
- Discriminating feature
- Lateral styloid fragment
- Articular
- Yes (lateral)
- Carpal relationship
- Normal (or scapholunate injury)
- Key pitfall
- Missing associated SL ligament tear
Investigations
- PA view: Shows rim fragment, radial shortening, articular involvement
- Lateral view: CRITICAL - demonstrates subluxation direction and rim involved
- Oblique views: Additional fragment detail
- Volar rim fragment visible on lateral view
- Carpus subluxated volarly (anterior to radius shaft)
- Lunate may appear tilted volarly
- Volar cortex disruption on PA view
- Dorsal rim fragment visible on lateral view
- Carpus subluxated dorsally (posterior to radius shaft)
- Lunate may appear tilted dorsally
- Dorsal cortex disruption on PA view
- Size of rim fragment (percentage of articular surface)
- Degree of subluxation (mm of carpal translation)
- Articular step-off (mm)
- Radial height loss
- Radial inclination
CT is recommended for all Barton's fractures being treated surgically. It provides:
- Precise fragment size and orientation
- Detection of additional fracture lines
- Assessment of articular surface congruity
- Surgical planning for plate and screw placement
- Exact fragment size as percentage of joint surface
- Coronal plane fracture orientation
- Comminution assessment
- Associated carpal injuries
- Not routine for acute Barton's fractures
- Consider if persistent pain after healing
- Evaluates TFCC and ligamentous injuries

Management Algorithm

Role of non-operative management:
Non-operative treatment is rarely appropriate for Barton's fractures due to their inherent instability. The carpal subluxation cannot be maintained with casting alone.
- Truly non-displaced fracture without subluxation (rare - may not be true Barton's)
- Patient unfit for surgery with acceptable alignment
- Palliative situation
- Closed reduction under anesthesia
- Sugar-tong splint initially
- Long arm cast when swelling subsides
- Position: neutral rotation, slight extension (for volar), slight flexion (for dorsal)
- Weekly X-rays for first 3 weeks - high failure rate
Most surgeons consider all displaced Barton's fractures as operative injuries and proceed directly to surgical fixation.
Surgical Technique

- Supine, arm table, tourniquet
- Image intensifier available
- Regional or general anesthesia
- Longitudinal incision over FCR tendon (6-8cm)
- Incise FCR sheath, retract FCR ulnarly (protects median nerve)
- Retract FPL radially
- Incise pronator quadratus in L-shape, elevate from radial border
- Expose fracture site directly
- Clear hematoma and debris from fracture
- Identify volar rim fragment
- Reduce carpus by traction and direct manipulation
- Reduce rim fragment to articular surface
- Provisional K-wire fixation
- Confirm reduction with fluoroscopy
- Select appropriate volar locking plate
- Position plate to support volar rim (buttress effect)
- Fix shaft first (allows plate adjustment)
- Insert distal locking screws into rim fragment
- Confirm screws capture fragment and do not penetrate joint
- Final fluoroscopy: PA, lateral, tilted lateral
- Plate must extend distally enough to buttress the rim
- Balance with watershed line (too distal causes tendon problems)
- Small fragments may need specialized low-profile implants
Careful attention to plate position optimizes fixation and minimizes complications.
The commonest modern reason a volar Barton's (or any volar marginal fracture) fails despite a volar plate is an unrecognised, separate volar lunate facet fragment - the "critical corner":
- It is a small fragment of the volar-ulnar corner of the distal radius, carrying the short radiolunate ligament - the key restraint preventing volar carpal subluxation.
- It lies distal to the watershed line, so the distal screws of a standard volar locking plate cannot reach or capture it. The plate buttresses the main rim but the corner (and with it the carpus) subluxes volarly - the construct fails early.
- Recognise it: scrutinise the lateral and a CT for a small, separate volar-ulnar fragment; persistent volar carpal translation after plating is the warning sign.
- Fix it specifically: a more distal placement is not the answer (it crosses the watershed line - see Soong below); instead use a fragment-specific implant - a volar rim / hook ("tine") plate, a spring/wire-form fixation, or a separate distal screw construct that captures the corner without sitting prominently on the volar surface.
Exam point: a volar Barton's that re-subluxes after a textbook-looking volar plate = a missed volar lunate facet (critical corner) fragment needing fragment-specific fixation.
Complications
- Incidence
- 10-20%
- Prevention/Management
- Anatomic reduction (less than 2mm step), stable fixation
- Incidence
- Variable
- Prevention/Management
- Adequate fixation, early motion
- Incidence
- 5-15%
- Prevention/Management
- Appropriate plate position, low-profile dorsal implants
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Prevention/Management
- Address associated ligament injuries
- Incidence
- 5%
- Prevention/Management
- Careful approach, release if symptomatic
- Incidence
- 10-20%
- Prevention/Management
- Early motion protocol, hand therapy
- Incidence
- 10-15%
- Prevention/Management
- Proper plate sizing, removal if symptomatic
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Prevention/Management
- Address ulnar styloid, TFCC repair if needed
Post-traumatic arthritis:
Post-traumatic arthritis is the most significant long-term complication of Barton's fractures. Studies show that articular step-off greater than 2mm significantly increases the risk of symptomatic arthritis. Anatomic reduction of the articular surface is the most important factor in preventing this complication.
- Volar approach: FPL irritation/rupture if plate beyond watershed line
- Dorsal approach: EPL rupture most common, EDC irritation
- Prevention: appropriate plate position, low-profile implants, EPL transposition
- May result from associated ligament injury (not addressed)
- Or from inadequate reduction allowing chronic subluxation
- Requires ligament reconstruction if symptomatic
- More common with prolonged immobilization
- Early motion protocol reduces risk
- Hand therapy essential for optimal outcomes
The flip side of "get the plate distal enough" is "do not cross the watershed line" - the named concept behind flexor tendon rupture after volar plating:
- The watershed line is the most volar (palmar) bony ridge of the distal radius, just proximal to the joint; the flexor tendons (especially FPL) glide directly over it. A plate placed distal to this line sits proud beneath the tendons and abrades them.
- The Soong grading of volar plate prominence (Soong et al. - the topic's evidence card) stratifies risk: Grade 0 = plate proximal to the watershed line and not volar to the volar rim; Grade 1 = plate at/over the volar rim but proximal to the critical line; Grade 2 = plate volar to the volar rim (most prominent) - Grade 2 carries the highest FPL rupture risk.
- The tension to resolve: the critical-corner fragment tempts you to place the plate too distal (raising the Soong grade and FPL risk), while tendon safety pushes the plate proximal (risking loss of the corner). The solution is a low-profile or fragment-specific implant that captures the distal fragment without sitting volar to the watershed line.
Exam point: late spontaneous FPL (then index FDP) rupture after volar plating = a prominent (Soong Grade 2) plate distal to the watershed line; manage with early plate removal once united.
Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation
- Volar splint in neutral position
- Elevation and ice
- Active finger ROM immediately
- Wound check at 48-72 hours
- Edema control measures
- Remove splint, convert to removable wrist orthosis
- Begin active wrist ROM (flexion, extension, radial/ulnar deviation)
- Suture removal at 10-14 days
- Hand therapy referral
- Continue finger ROM
- Progress active ROM
- Begin forearm rotation
- Gentle passive ROM after week 4
- Edema control, scar management
- X-ray at 6 weeks to confirm healing
- Discontinue orthosis if healed
- Progressive strengthening
- Grip strengthening exercises
- Return to light activities
- Full ROM goal by 10-12 weeks
- Return to full activities
- Sport-specific rehabilitation if needed
- Consider hardware removal if symptomatic
- Final outcome assessment
Rehabilitation principles:
- Stable fixation allows early motion
- Balance protection with mobilization
- Hand therapy optimizes outcomes
- Watch for signs of complication (pain, weakness, numbness)
The goal of stable internal fixation is to allow early wrist motion within the first 1-2 weeks. This reduces stiffness, improves outcomes, and is a key advantage of operative management over casting.
Outcomes and Prognosis
Outcomes with operative treatment:
Modern surgical treatment of Barton's fractures produces good to excellent results in the majority of patients. Key outcome determinants include:
- Anatomic articular reduction (less than 2mm step)
- Stable fixation achieved
- Early motion protocol
- Young age
- Single fragment pattern
- No associated carpal injury
- Articular incongruity (greater than 2mm step)
- Comminuted fragment
- Associated carpal ligament injury
- Elderly with poor bone quality
- Delayed treatment
- Most patients achieve functional ROM (within 20-30 degrees of normal)
- Grip strength typically recovers to 70-80% of contralateral
- Return to work: 4-8 weeks (desk), 8-12 weeks (manual)
- Return to sport: 3-4 months


Long-term considerations:
- Post-traumatic arthritis risk correlates with reduction quality
- Symptomatic arthritis may require salvage procedures (fusion, arthroplasty)
- Hardware removal in 15-20% for irritation
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global epidemiology
Barton's fracture is an uncommon pattern, accounting for a small proportion of the very large global burden of distal radius fractures (one of the most common fractures worldwide, with a characteristic bimodal distribution: younger patients sustaining high-energy injuries and older patients with osteoporotic fragility falls). Volar Barton's is encountered more frequently than the dorsal (reverse) variant, which is genuinely rare, with the largest published surgical series numbering only ~20 cases (Lozano-Calderón et al., PMID 16818974). The defining articular-rim-plus-subluxation pattern is consistent across populations; resource setting affects access to CT and to low-profile fragment-specific implants rather than the injury itself.
Major guidelines, side by side
The dedicated evidence base for Barton's fractures is limited to retrospective series, so guidance is largely extrapolated from the wider distal radius and partial-articular fracture literature. The strongest unifying recommendation across bodies is that displaced partial articular (rim) fractures with carpal subluxation are surgical and that fixation should be driven by fracture pattern.
- Position relevant to Barton's
- Operative fixation favoured where it restores articular congruity; for unstable patterns, technique should be driven by fracture pattern (no single construct superior beyond 3 months). Age ~65 used as a proxy for activity in deciding surgery for the broader fracture group.
- Evidence level
- Moderate–Strong (CPG)
- Position relevant to Barton's
- Classifies as partial articular 23-B3 (coronal/frontal-plane rim); recommends buttress (anti-glide) plating on the side of the fragment as the governing biomechanical principle.
- Evidence level
- Expert consensus / principle-based
- Position relevant to Barton's
- Displaced intra-articular fractures should be managed at units able to deliver definitive fixation with early senior review; emphasis on early definitive surgery and rehabilitation.
- Evidence level
- Consensus standard
- Position relevant to Barton's
- Aligns with AO buttress principle; advocates anatomic articular reduction and stable fixation permitting early motion.
- Evidence level
- Expert consensus
Registry evidence
Major arthroplasty registries (NJR, AJRR, AOANJRR, SHAR, Norwegian, NZJR) do not track fracture-fixation implants such as distal radius plates, so there is no registry-level survivorship data specific to Barton's fixation; the evidence base is therefore confined to single-centre series and comparative cohorts (e.g. Tang et al., PMID 22868605).
Global practice variation
- Implant choice: volar locking plates are the default for volar Barton's worldwide; in limited-resource settings, non-locking buttress plates or K-wire/external-fixation constructs remain in use and still achieve union, though with modestly lower functional scores (Tang et al., PMID 22868605).
- Dorsal Barton's: managed by dorsal buttress plating where low-profile implants are available; fragment-specific or wire fixation is substituted where they are not.
- Imaging: CT for pre-operative planning is routine in high-resource centres but selectively used elsewhere; the lateral radiograph remains the universal diagnostic view.
Across every major board, Barton's fractures test the same four points: (1) differentiating the rim-with-subluxation pattern from Smith and Colles, (2) explaining why the radiocarpal ligaments make it inherently unstable, (3) the buttress (anti-glide) plating principle, and (4) selecting the surgical approach to match the fractured rim. Expect a lateral radiograph and a request to compare the three patterns.
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What distinguishes a Barton's fracture from other distal radius fractures? A: Barton's fracture is a rim fracture with carpal subluxation. The carpus subluxates with the rim fragment because the radiocarpal ligaments remain attached to the fragment.
Q: A volar Barton's fracture is synonymous with which Thomas classification? A: Thomas Type II Smith fracture. Both describe a volar rim fracture-subluxation of the distal radius.
Q: What plate position is required for a dorsal Barton's fracture? A: Dorsal buttress plate. The plate must be on the same side as the fracture to provide buttress effect. A volar plate cannot buttress a dorsal rim fragment.
Q: What mechanism typically causes a volar Barton's fracture? A: Axial load with wrist in flexion. This creates a shear force that fractures the volar rim. Extension mechanism causes dorsal Barton's.
Q: What articular step-off threshold is associated with increased post-traumatic arthritis? A: Greater than 2mm. Studies (Knirk and Jupiter) show significant increase in radiographic arthritis with greater than 2mm articular incongruity.
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 35-year-old man falls from a ladder onto his outstretched left hand with the wrist flexed. X-rays show a fracture of the volar rim of the distal radius with volar subluxation of the carpus. How would you manage this injury?”
“A 28-year-old woman falls during gymnastics, landing on her outstretched hand with the wrist extended. X-rays show a fracture of the dorsal rim of the distal radius with dorsal subluxation of the carpus. How does your management differ from a volar Barton's?”
“An examiner shows you lateral radiographs of three different distal radius fractures and asks you to differentiate them. One shows volar angulation with no articular involvement, one shows a volar rim fracture with volar carpal subluxation, and one shows dorsal angulation. Identify each and explain the key distinguishing features.”
DEFINING FEATURES
- Rim fracture (volar or dorsal) WITH carpal subluxation
- Carpus subluxates with fragment (ligaments attached)
- Volar Barton = Thomas Type II Smith fracture
- Always intra-articular (partial articular AO 23-B3)
VOLAR VS DORSAL
- Volar Barton: Volar rim + volar subluxation (3x more common)
- Dorsal Barton: Dorsal rim + dorsal subluxation
- Mechanism: Volar = flexed wrist, Dorsal = extended wrist
- Plate MUST match fracture side (buttress principle)
WHY ALWAYS UNSTABLE
- Radiocarpal ligaments remain attached to rim fragment
- When rim fractures, ligaments pull carpus with it
- Intact rim acts as ramp allowing subluxation
- No cast can maintain reduction
SURGICAL TREATMENT
- Volar Barton: FCR approach, volar buttress plate
- Dorsal Barton: Dorsal approach, low-profile dorsal plate
- Goal: Anatomic reduction (less than 2mm step)
- Early motion within 1-2 weeks
COMPLICATIONS
- Post-traumatic arthritis (greater than 2mm step = high risk)
- Tendon complications (FPL volar, EPL dorsal)
- Carpal instability if reduction not maintained
- Stiffness if prolonged immobilization
EXAM DIFFERENTIALS
- Smith: Volar angulation, NO subluxation, extra-articular (Type I/III)
- Colles: Dorsal angulation, NO subluxation
- Barton: Rim fracture WITH subluxation (key feature)
- Die-punch: Articular depression, no subluxation
Evidence Base
- Landmark study of 43 intra-articular distal radius fractures in young adults (mean age 27.6). Radiographic post-traumatic arthritis developed in 91% of joints healing with residual radiocarpal incongruity versus only 11% when the joint healed congruously. Accurate articular restoration was the single most critical determinant of outcome.
- Two cohorts (168 plated radii) graded by plate prominence relative to the volar 'watershed' line. Three flexor tendon ruptures occurred (4% prevalence) in the cohort with prominent (Grade 2) plates; none occurred in the lower-profile cohort. Introduced the widely used Soong grading of volar plate prominence.
- Series of 20 dorsal (reverse) Barton's fractures, 18 treated with dorsal buttress plating. At a mean of 30 months, 18/20 achieved excellent/good Gartland-Werley scores with grip strength 85% of the contralateral side. Most were accompanied by a spectrum of volar injuries (ligament tears, volar lip fractures, articular impaction).
- Comparative study of 33 volar Barton's fractures. All united; radiographic parameters (radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance) were equivalent between anatomical and locking plates. Good/excellent functional results were higher with locking plates (94.1%) than anatomical plates (75%).
- Identified a variant of volar Barton's fracture with a subtle additional fracture of the dorsal metaphyseal cortex. Where this dorsal line was unrecognised and an undercontoured volar buttress plate was used, all 5 patients lost palmar tilt with dorsal translation of the articular fragment.
- Review distinguishing high-energy radiocarpal fracture-dislocations (with disruption of the radiocarpal ligaments and usually both styloids) from rim-fragment Barton's fractures. Closed reduction is usually achievable but open reduction and internal fixation is typically required for anatomic restoration.