Skip to main content
OrthoVellum
Clinical Atlas
OrthoVellum
Clinical Atlas

Comprehensive orthopaedic learning and teaching for clinical education. Content is educational only and is not a substitute for local supervision, clinical judgement, or institutional policy.

Library

  • Clinical Topics
  • Blog
  • Site Updates
  • Content Methodology
  • Editorial Policy

Company

  • About Us
  • Authors & Disclosure
  • Editorial Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Content Methodology
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Blog

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Copyright & DMCA

Support

  • Support OrthoVellum
  • Help Center
  • Accessibility
  • Report an Issue
Evidence. Clarity. Practice.

© 2026 OrthoVellum. For educational purposes only.

Not medical advice. Verify clinically important information against current local guidance.

Surgical Approaches to the Ankle, Hindfoot and Foot

Back to Topics
Contents
0%
GeneralSurgical Approaches

Surgical Approaches to the Ankle, Hindfoot and Foot

Advanced orthopaedic guide to surgical approaches around the ankle, hindfoot and foot, including anterior ankle, posterolateral ankle, medial ankle, sinus tarsi, extensile lateral calcaneus, dorsal midfoot and medial first-ray exposures.

complete
Reviewed: 2026-06-03Maintained by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorially maintained by OrthoVellum Editorial Team

Clear references, transparent review, and correction process • Published by OrthoVellum Medical Education Team

Editorial boardMethodologyReview policyReport a correction
Educational disclosure

Educational content is reviewed for source visibility, editorial coherence, and correction readiness.

No individual clinician credential is claimed unless a named person is shown.

Verify before clinical use; this is not medical advice or a substitute for local guidance.

Surgical Approaches to the Ankle, Hindfoot and Foot

High Yield Overview

Ankle, Hindfoot and Foot Approaches

Choose the exposure by target, soft tissue and danger structures

Targetdefines exposure
Envelopecontrols timing
Nervesmust be named

Approach Families

Anterior ankle
PatternAnterior ankle arthroplasty, anterior arthrodesis, anterior plafond and arthroscopy portals.
TreatmentProtect superficial peroneal branches, deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis.
Posterolateral ankle
PatternPosterior malleolus, posterior fibula, peroneal tendons and posterolateral hindfoot.
TreatmentProtect sural nerve, lesser saphenous vein, flexor hallucis longus and peroneal tendons.
Medial ankle
PatternMedial malleolus, deltoid, talar neck/body access and tarsal tunnel region.
TreatmentProtect saphenous structures superficially and posterior tibial neurovascular bundle deeply.
Hindfoot and calcaneus
PatternSinus tarsi, extensile lateral calcaneus, subtalar and lateral hindfoot access.
TreatmentBalance articular exposure against wound risk and skin flap vascularity.
Midfoot and forefoot
PatternDorsal Lisfranc/TMT, medial column and first-ray approaches.
TreatmentProtect dorsal neurovascular structures, skin bridges and tendon gliding surfaces.

Critical Must-Knows

  • The approach is chosen by the structure that needs reduction, fixation, release, fusion or reconstruction.
  • Swelling, scars, diabetes, smoking, vascular disease and previous incisions can make the technically familiar approach unsafe.
  • Anterior ankle work risks superficial peroneal branches superficially and deep peroneal nerve with dorsalis pedis artery in the deep interval.
  • Calcaneal approach choice is a soft-tissue decision as much as a fracture decision: sinus tarsi reduces wound burden but gives less extensile exposure.
  • Dorsal midfoot incisions need deliberate skin bridge planning because wound breakdown over Lisfranc fixation is difficult to rescue.

Clinical Pearls

  • "
    For posterior malleolus fixation, CT pattern and reduction target matter more than fragment-size rules alone.
  • "
    For calcaneus fractures, sinus tarsi is attractive when the joint can be reduced through a limited window; extensile lateral remains useful when wide reduction is required.
  • "
    For total ankle replacement, the approach is linked to implant design and the planned correction strategy.
  • "
    For any foot approach, closure and postoperative swelling control are part of the operation, not an administrative detail.

The foot and ankle punish casual soft-tissue handling

Do not force an approach through swollen skin, tight scars or a poor flap. In this region, the wound can fail even when the reduction or implant position is good.

Ankle hindfoot and foot approach selection infographic
Approach choice follows the operative target: anterior ankle, posterolateral ankle, medial ankle, sinus tarsi, extensile lateral calcaneus, dorsal midfoot or medial first ray.Credit: Original OrthoVellum illustration

At a Glance: Approach Choice

TargetUseful ExposureMain RiskPractical Rule
Anterior ankle arthritis or plafondAnterior ankle approachSuperficial peroneal branches, deep peroneal nerve, dorsalis pedisMark nerves, preserve full-thickness flaps and keep interval controlled.
Posterior malleolusPosterolateral ankle approachSural nerve, lesser saphenous vein, FHL intervalUse CT to decide whether direct posterior buttress is needed.
Calcaneal posterior facetSinus tarsi or extensile lateralLateral wound flap, sural nerve, peroneal tendonsPick the smallest exposure that still permits accurate reduction.
Lisfranc / TMT jointDorsal midfoot windowsDorsalis pedis, deep peroneal nerve, skin bridgePlan incisions around columns and fixation, not just the visible diastasis.
First ray / medial columnMedial first-ray or medial column approachDorsomedial cutaneous nerve, capsule, wound irritationProtect skin and plan correction, fixation and shoe-wear implications.
Mnemonic

SAFEApproach Description

S
Soft tissue
Swelling, scars, vascularity and skin bridge.
A
Anatomy
Name the nerve, artery, tendon and interval.
F
Fixation target
Expose the fragment, joint or implant surface that must be controlled.
E
Exit plan
Closure, immobilisation, weight-bearing and wound review.

Memory Hook:SAFE keeps the approach practical.

Mnemonic

DRAPEFoot and Ankle Setup

D
Define imaging
Confirm AP, mortise, lateral, Broden or foot views before prepping.
R
Review scars
Old incisions can decide the new approach.
A
Assess swelling
Wrinkle sign and soft-tissue readiness matter.
P
Protect nerves
Mark superficial peroneal, sural and saphenous risk zones.
E
Expose only enough
Avoid unnecessary stripping in a thin envelope.

Memory Hook:DRAPE before the incision.

Overview and Indications

Foot and ankle approaches are high-risk because the operative targets are small, the skin envelope is thin, and the incisions often lie directly over implants. A safe approach begins by defining the target: ankle joint, posterior malleolus, distal fibula, medial malleolus, talus, calcaneus, subtalar joint, Lisfranc complex, medial column, first ray or lesser rays.

The second decision is the soft-tissue route. A perfect bony plan is not useful if the incision crosses compromised skin or creates a flap that cannot survive. Open fractures, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, neuropathy, smoking, oedema, previous scars and swelling after high-energy trauma all shift the balance toward staged surgery, limited exposure or a different incision.

Trauma

CT pattern, swelling, reduction target and fixation surface decide whether exposure is direct, limited, extensile or staged.

Reconstruction

Deformity correction needs an approach that permits release, correction, fixation and safe closure.

Arthroplasty / Fusion

Implant design, bone preparation, alignment correction and wound risk influence anterior, lateral, transfibular or arthroscopic choices.

Approach choice is a management decision

For calcaneus, posterior malleolus, Lisfranc and total ankle surgery, the approach is not just anatomy recall. It determines whether reduction, fixation, wound healing and later reconstruction are realistic.

Relevant Anatomy

The foot and ankle contain many named structures in shallow tissue planes. The main safety rule is simple: identify the structure at risk before retraction, not after bleeding, numbness or tendon injury occurs.

Ankle and foot approach safety checklist
Danger structures should be named before retracting. This checklist keeps nerve, vessel, tendon and wound-envelope risks visible during approach planning.Credit: Original OrthoVellum illustration

Anatomy That Changes the Approach

StructureWhere It MattersPractical Protection
Superficial peroneal nerveAnterolateral ankle, dorsal midfootMark branches if visible or palpable; avoid blind subcutaneous spreading.
Deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis arteryAnterior ankle and first web intervalStay in the correct interval and protect the deep bundle during anterior ankle work.
Sural nerve and lesser saphenous veinPosterolateral ankle, lateral calcaneusPlan incision and retraction with the nerve course in mind.
Saphenous nerve and veinMedial ankle and medial columnProtect superficial structures during medial incisions.
Posterior tibial neurovascular bundleTarsal tunnel and medial hindfootAvoid uncontrolled deep medial dissection; know the bundle position before release.
Peroneal tendonsLateral malleolus and lateral calcaneusProtect tendon sheath and avoid iatrogenic subluxation or irritation.
Skin flapsCalcaneus, Lisfranc, arthroplasty and revision surgeryCreate full-thickness flaps and avoid narrow threatened bridges.

Do not trust a wound that is too tight to close

Foot and ankle implants often sit under thin skin. If closure requires tension, rethink fixation prominence, flap handling, drains, negative-pressure dressing and postoperative swelling control.

Internervous Plane and Intervals

Some exposures use named internervous planes. Many foot and ankle approaches are better described as tendon windows, safe corridors or direct subperiosteal exposures. In practice, the important step is to state the interval and the structures at risk.

Common Intervals and Windows

ExposurePlane or WindowTargetMain Risk
Anterior ankleBetween tibialis anterior and EHL or between EHL and EDL depending targetTAA, arthrodesis, anterior plafondDeep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis; superficial peroneal branches.
Posterolateral ankleBetween peroneal tendons and FHL regionPosterior malleolus, posterior fibula, peroneal tendonsSural nerve, lesser saphenous vein, FHL handling.
Medial ankleDirect medial malleolar or deltoid exposure; deeper tarsal tunnel region when indicatedMedial malleolus, deltoid, talusSaphenous structures superficially; posterior tibial bundle posteriorly.
Sinus tarsiLateral interval through sinus tarsi toward posterior facetCalcaneal posterior facet and subtalar jointSural nerve branches, peroneal tendons, limited visualisation.
Extensile lateral calcaneusFull-thickness lateral flap based on lateral calcaneal wallWide calcaneal reduction and platingWound edge necrosis, sural nerve, peroneal tendons.
Dorsal midfootDorsal windows between extensor tendons and neurovascular structuresLisfranc and TMT fixationDeep peroneal nerve, dorsalis pedis and skin bridge.

The posterior malleolus is a CT decision

Fragment size alone is an unreliable approach rule. The CT pattern, syndesmotic stability, articular impaction, posterior incisura involvement and ability to reduce the fragment decide whether direct posterior exposure is useful.

Patient Positioning

Positioning must allow exposure, reduction and imaging. Before draping, check the image intensifier can obtain the views needed for the operation: ankle AP, mortise, lateral, Broden, Harris axial, oblique foot or weight-bearing comparison images when relevant.

Clinical photographs showing ankle arthroscopy portal positions
Ankle portal positioning demonstrates why superficial nerve marking and image-confirmed setup matter before anterior or posterior ankle work.Credit: Frank RM et al., Anatomy Research International via PMC3830799, CC-BY

Positioning Choices

PositionBest UsePractical Checks
SupineAnterior ankle, medial malleolus, medial column, many forefoot proceduresBump under hip if needed; foot at table end; confirm mortise and lateral imaging.
LateralExtensile lateral calcaneus, sinus tarsi, lateral hindfoot, peroneal tendonsPad bony prominences; protect peroneal nerve at fibular head; check lateral and axial views.
PronePosterior ankle, FHL, posterior malleolus in selected workflowsAirway, pressure areas, image access and conversion plan matter.
Supine with bump or figure-of-fourPosterolateral ankle in selected fracture fixationAllows combined medial/lateral access when posterior exposure is limited but needed.
Traction or distractor setupAnkle arthroscopy, subtalar arthroscopy, selected fusionsPortal safety, nerve marking and distraction force must be controlled.

Surgical Technique

Useful for: total ankle replacement, open ankle arthrodesis, anterior plafond work, anterior osteophytes and anterior ankle exposure.

  1. Supine position, foot at end of table, tourniquet if used, fluoroscopy checked.
  2. Mark tibialis anterior, EHL, EDL, superficial peroneal branches if visible, and the planned incision.
  3. Use a longitudinal anterior incision centred over the ankle joint and planned implant or fusion surface.
  4. Develop full-thickness flaps; avoid thin undermined skin.
  5. Identify the interval. Commonly work between tibialis anterior and EHL or between EHL and EDL according to target.
  6. Protect the deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis artery in the deep anterior interval.
  7. Expose the capsule, open the joint and perform the planned preparation, reduction, fusion or arthroplasty steps.
  8. Close capsule and retinacular layers carefully; avoid prominent implants under the incision.

Pitfalls: superficial peroneal neuritis, deep peroneal injury, wound breakdown, extensor tendon irritation and poor access to posterior deformity.

Useful for: posterior malleolus reduction, posterior buttress plating, posterior fibula, peroneal tendon work and selected ankle fracture patterns.

  1. Position lateral, prone or supine with appropriate rotation depending the combined approach plan.
  2. Mark lateral malleolus, Achilles, peroneal tendons and likely sural nerve zone.
  3. Make a longitudinal posterolateral incision between posterior fibula and Achilles region.
  4. Protect sural nerve and lesser saphenous vein.
  5. Develop the interval between peroneal tendons and FHL region.
  6. Retract FHL medially when needed; it helps shield the posterior neurovascular bundle.
  7. Expose posterior malleolus, reduce the fragment directly and apply posterior buttress or posterior-to-anterior fixation when indicated.
  8. Check posterior fragment reduction, fibular length and syndesmotic stability.

Pitfalls: sural nerve injury, inadequate CT planning, plate too lateral for posterior shear, and failure to reassess syndesmosis after posterior fixation.

Useful for: medial malleolus fixation, deltoid exposure, talar neck/body access, medial gutter work and selected tarsal tunnel or medial hindfoot surgery.

  1. Supine position with foot externally rotated or supported for medial access.
  2. Mark medial malleolus, tibialis posterior course, saphenous vein and previous scars.
  3. Use a longitudinal or gently curved medial incision according to target.
  4. Protect saphenous nerve and vein in the superficial layer.
  5. For medial malleolus, expose fracture edges subperiosteally only as needed.
  6. For deeper medial hindfoot work, identify the relationship to tibialis posterior, FDL, posterior tibial neurovascular bundle and FHL.
  7. Avoid uncontrolled posterior dissection unless a tarsal tunnel or deep medial approach is deliberately planned.

Pitfalls: saphenous neuritis, posterior tibial bundle injury, tibialis posterior irritation and medial wound tension.

Useful for: displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures where the posterior facet can be reduced through a limited lateral window, subtalar joint access and selected lateral hindfoot work.

Sinus tarsi calcaneus approach and intraoperative reduction image
Sinus tarsi exposure provides lateral subtalar access with less soft-tissue stripping than an extensile lateral flap, but the reduction window is smaller.Credit: Yeo JH et al., BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders via PMC8759195, CC-BY
  1. Lateral position, swelling assessed, fluoroscopy checked for lateral, axial and Broden-type views.
  2. Mark lateral malleolus, sinus tarsi, peroneal tendons and sural nerve risk zone.
  3. Make an oblique or longitudinal incision over the sinus tarsi region.
  4. Protect superficial nerve branches and peroneal tendons.
  5. Enter the sinus tarsi and expose posterior facet as required.
  6. Reduce facet and tuberosity using percutaneous joysticks, clamps or elevators.
  7. Fix with screws or a limited plate according to fracture pattern.
  8. Confirm height, width, varus correction, posterior facet reduction and hardware position.

Pitfalls: inadequate view for a complex fracture, missed varus/tuberosity malreduction, sural nerve irritation and relying on the incision when percutaneous reduction tools are needed.

Useful for: complex calcaneal fractures requiring wide lateral wall, posterior facet and tuberosity exposure.

Extensile lateral calcaneus approach with lateral wall plate fixation
The extensile lateral approach gives wide calcaneal exposure but depends on full-thickness flap handling and a soft-tissue envelope that can tolerate the incision.Credit: Yeo JH et al., BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders via PMC8759195, CC-BY
  1. Lateral position with the injured side up.
  2. Confirm the skin envelope is ready; do not use the approach through tense swelling.
  3. Mark lateral malleolus, Achilles, fifth metatarsal base and calcaneal border.
  4. Raise a full-thickness L-shaped lateral flap; do not thin the flap.
  5. Protect sural nerve and peroneal tendons.
  6. Use temporary wires in talus or cuboid only when safe to support retraction.
  7. Reduce tuberosity, posterior facet, anterior process and lateral wall in sequence.
  8. Apply plate or screws, confirm reduction and close without tension.

Pitfalls: wound edge necrosis, flap devascularisation, peroneal tendon irritation, prominent lateral hardware and forcing this approach when a limited approach would be enough.

Useful for: Lisfranc reduction and fixation, TMT arthrodesis, medial column work, first-ray reconstruction and selected forefoot procedures.

  1. Supine position, bump if needed, foot at table edge.
  2. Mark dorsalis pedis, EHL, EDB, first and second TMT joints, and previous scars.
  3. Plan one or more dorsal incisions with safe skin bridges.
  4. Protect superficial peroneal branches and the deep peroneal nerve/dorsalis pedis bundle.
  5. Expose the target column directly: medial, middle or lateral column.
  6. Reduce joints anatomically and confirm alignment on AP, oblique and lateral imaging.
  7. Place screws, plates or bridge constructs according to injury pattern or fusion plan.
  8. Close with swelling control and a clear non-weight-bearing plan.

Pitfalls: narrow skin bridge, dorsal wound breakdown, neurovascular injury, malreduction of the second ray, and fixation prominence under thin dorsal skin.

Structures at Risk and Pitfalls

The most common error is treating a foot and ankle approach as a named incision rather than a wound-risk decision. The second error is not matching the exposure to the reduction or fixation target.

Pitfalls That Change Outcomes

PitfallWhy It MattersPrevention
Ignoring swellingThin skin and oedema increase breakdown risk.Delay definitive surgery or use staged/limited exposure when needed.
Wrong posterior malleolus approachAn indirect screw may not control a posterior shear fragment.Read CT and choose direct buttress when the pattern requires it.
Extensile calcaneus through poor skinFlap necrosis can be limb-threatening in high-risk patients.Wait for soft-tissue readiness or use limited/percutaneous strategies.
Dorsal midfoot skin bridge too narrowWound failure occurs directly over implants.Plan incisions around columns and expected fixation.
Unidentified nerve branchNeuroma, numbness and pain can dominate the outcome.Mark, identify and protect superficial peroneal, sural and saphenous structures.
Prominent implants under thin skinIrritation, tendon wear and wound compromise.Contour and bury hardware appropriately; check closure before finalising.

Small incision does not mean small operation

A limited approach still needs full reduction strategy, fluoroscopic control, percutaneous tools, safe fixation and a plan if the reduction cannot be achieved.

Closure and Wound Management

Closure is part of the approach. Foot and ankle incisions sit close to tendons, implants and bony prominences. A wound that closes under tension should be treated as a warning sign, not as a cosmetic issue.

Before Closure

Reassess hardware prominence, tendon position, haemostasis, drain need and whether the skin can close without tension.

After Closure

Splint or boot position should reduce tension on the incision and protect the repair or fixation.

Early Review

Check wound edge viability, swelling, sensation, pin sites and signs of infection before weight-bearing progression.

Do not hide wound risk in the postoperative plan

If the patient has diabetes, neuropathy, vascular disease, smoking, revision surgery, severe swelling or multiple incisions, state the wound-risk plan explicitly.

Evidence Base

Posterior Malleolus: Direct Posterior Fixation

Verhage and colleagues • Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (2018)
Key Findings:
  • CT-based assessment is central to posterior malleolus planning.
  • Direct posterior approaches allow buttress fixation for posterior shear patterns.
  • Clear universal size thresholds remain weak.
Clinical Implication: Choose the posterolateral approach when direct reduction and posterior buttress fixation are needed, not simply because the fragment is present.

Calcaneus: Sinus Tarsi versus Extensile Lateral

Luo and colleagues • Medicine (2021)
Key Findings:
  • Sinus tarsi approach is associated with fewer wound problems in many series.
  • Extensile lateral approach provides broader visual access.
  • Fracture complexity and reduction requirement still decide approach choice.
Clinical Implication: Do not present sinus tarsi as universally superior. It is a soft-tissue-sparing option when the fracture can be reduced through that window.

Lisfranc: Modified Dorsal Approach

Kirzner and colleagues • Foot & Ankle International (2018)
Key Findings:
  • Lisfranc approach choice must preserve dorsal skin bridges.
  • Exposure must permit anatomic reduction of the columns involved.
  • Wound complications remain a major practical concern.
Clinical Implication: Plan dorsal midfoot incisions around the columns and fixation strategy, with skin bridge safety as a core part of reduction planning.

Ankle Arthrodesis: Technique and Complication Variation

Mahamid and colleagues • Cureus (2025)
Key Findings:
  • Approach choice is linked to deformity, bone loss, fixation strategy and soft tissue.
  • Arthroscopic approaches can reduce soft-tissue disruption in selected patients.
  • Complex deformity or bone loss may require open exposure.
Clinical Implication: For ankle fusion, match the approach to deformity correction and fixation needs rather than defaulting to one incision.

Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Anterior and Lateral Approaches

Landi and colleagues • Healthcare (2025)
Key Findings:
  • Approach selection is linked to implant design and deformity correction.
  • Anterior approaches require careful superficial peroneal and deep anterior bundle protection.
  • Lateral transfibular approaches trade wound and fibular osteotomy considerations against exposure advantages.
Clinical Implication: A total ankle approach answer should connect implant design, correction plan, nerve risk and wound management.

Viva Scenarios

Use these scenarios to practise clinical reasoning and management decisions

CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

Posterior malleolus fixation

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A patient has a trimalleolar ankle fracture. CT shows a posterolateral posterior malleolar fragment with posterior incisura involvement and syndesmotic instability."

PRACTICAL APPROACH
I would plan fixation from the CT pattern. Because the fragment involves the posterior incisura and contributes to syndesmotic stability, direct reduction is useful. I would use a posterolateral approach if the soft tissues allow it, protect the sural nerve and lesser saphenous vein, work between the peroneal tendons and FHL region, reduce the posterior fragment directly and apply posterior buttress fixation or posterior-to-anterior fixation as required. I would then reassess fibular fixation, medial malleolus fixation and syndesmotic stability.
KEY CLINICAL POINTS
CT pattern drives approach choice.
Posterolateral approach permits direct posterior reduction and buttress.
Protect sural nerve and use FHL as a deep safety reference.
Reassess syndesmosis after posterior fixation.
COMMON PITFALLS
✗Using fragment size alone as the decision rule.
✗Ignoring posterior incisura involvement.
✗Forgetting sural nerve risk.
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"When would an anterior-to-posterior screw be enough?"
"How does posterior malleolus fixation affect syndesmotic fixation?"
CLINICAL SCENARIOChallenging

Calcaneus approach choice

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A patient has a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture. The skin is swollen but improving. You are asked whether you would use a sinus tarsi or extensile lateral approach."

PRACTICAL APPROACH
I would decide from the soft tissues and CT morphology. If the posterior facet, tuberosity and varus can be reduced through a limited lateral window using percutaneous tools, a sinus tarsi approach reduces soft-tissue burden. If the fracture is highly comminuted, requires wide lateral wall exposure, or cannot be reduced safely through a limited window, an extensile lateral approach may be required after the wound envelope is ready. I would not use an extensile lateral approach through tense swollen skin.
KEY CLINICAL POINTS
Approach choice balances reduction need and wound risk.
Sinus tarsi is soft-tissue sparing but less extensile.
Extensile lateral provides broad exposure but higher wound burden.
Soft-tissue readiness is mandatory.
COMMON PITFALLS
✗Calling sinus tarsi universally superior.
✗Forcing an extensile lateral flap through swollen skin.
✗Failing to plan percutaneous reduction aids.
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"What images confirm calcaneal reduction?"
"What patient factors increase wound risk?"
CLINICAL SCENARIOStandard

Lisfranc dorsal exposure

CLINICAL PROMPT

"A patient has a Lisfranc fracture-dislocation requiring operative reduction and fixation. You are asked to describe your approach."

PRACTICAL APPROACH
I would plan dorsal incisions according to the involved columns and fixation strategy. I would mark the first and second TMT region, dorsalis pedis and EHL, and preserve safe skin bridges. Through dorsal windows, I would protect superficial peroneal branches and the deep peroneal nerve with dorsalis pedis bundle, expose the involved TMT joints, reduce the second ray and medial/middle columns anatomically, and confirm alignment on AP, oblique and lateral fluoroscopy before fixation.
KEY CLINICAL POINTS
Incisions follow columns and fixation plan.
Skin bridge safety is central.
Protect deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis.
Reduction of the second ray is critical.
COMMON PITFALLS
✗Using too many narrow dorsal incisions.
✗Ignoring dorsal wound risk over implants.
✗Accepting subtle second-ray malreduction.
FURTHER QUESTIONS
"What radiographic signs confirm Lisfranc reduction?"
"When would primary arthrodesis be considered?"

Ankle, Hindfoot and Foot Approaches: Must-Know Points

Clinical summary

Opening Line

  • •I choose the approach by operative target, CT morphology, fixation plan, soft-tissue envelope and danger structures.
  • •The incision is unsafe if the wound cannot close or if the danger structure has not been named.

Danger Structures

  • •Anterior ankle: superficial peroneal branches, deep peroneal nerve and dorsalis pedis.
  • •Posterolateral ankle and lateral calcaneus: sural nerve, lesser saphenous vein, peroneal tendons.
  • •Medial ankle: saphenous nerve and vein superficially; posterior tibial neurovascular bundle deeply.

Approach Decisions

  • •Posterior malleolus: use CT, not fragment size alone.
  • •Calcaneus: sinus tarsi for limited safe reduction; extensile lateral for wide reduction when the soft tissues allow.
  • •Lisfranc: dorsal windows must preserve skin bridges and permit anatomic second-ray reduction.

Technique Priorities

  • •Confirm imaging before draping.
  • •Raise full-thickness flaps where flaps are required.
  • •Avoid prominent hardware under thin skin.
  • •Closure, immobilisation and wound review are part of the approach.
Study Focus
Estimated read70 min

Decision sections

Related Topics

Surgical Approaches to the Cervical and Thoracolumbar Spine

Surgical Approaches to the Forearm, Wrist and Hand

Surgical Approaches to the Knee

Ankle & Foot Imaging: Systematic Interpretation