Function, classification, timing and reconstruction
- Describe the anatomy before naming an operation: thumb, digits, web spaces, wrist, forearm, skin, nails, joints, tendons and function.
- Use the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin framework to organise congenital hand differences, but do not let classification replace clinical description.
- Thumb function is the central decision point because opposition, stability and first web space determine pinch.
- Syndactyly release is web reconstruction; timing depends on border digits, growth tethering, complexity and skin cover.
- Polydactyly reconstruction is not simple amputation; the retained ray often needs ligament, tendon, bone and nail alignment.
- Screen for associated anomalies when the pattern suggests radial deficiency, syndromic syndactyly, bilateral disease or multi-system involvement.
- “Watch the child play before looking at the X-ray; spontaneous use often defines the real problem.
- “Border-digit syndactyly is released earlier because unequal digit lengths can tether growth and create angular deformity.
- “A small duplicated digit may carry collateral ligament, tendon or nail-fold anatomy needed for the retained digit.
- “A floating or unstable hypoplastic thumb may be less functional than an index finger pollicisation.
- “Families need a staged plan: diagnosis, development, surgery, therapy, scars, possible revision and realistic functional goals.
Parents may first ask about appearance, but congenital hand surgery is judged by function, sensibility, growth, scars, revision risk and the child's ability to use the hand in daily life.
Images and Diagrams


- Practical answer
- Observe spontaneous hand use.
- Why it matters
- The child often demonstrates the functional priority.
- Practical answer
- Thumb and first web space.
- Why it matters
- Opposition and stable pinch drive hand utility.
- Practical answer
- Oberg-Manske-Tonkin plus condition-specific systems.
- Why it matters
- Organises diagnosis without replacing description.
- Practical answer
- Operate when function or growth will benefit.
- Why it matters
- Avoid both delayed tethering and premature scarring.
- Practical answer
- Associated systemic patterns.
- Why it matters
- Radial and syndromic patterns may need cardiac, renal, haematology or genetics review.
HANDAssessment Sequence
Hook:HAND keeps the assessment function-led rather than operation-led.
PINCHThumb Function
Hook:PINCH is the practical thumb hypoplasia checklist.
WEBSyndactyly
Hook:WEB keeps syndactyly timing and surgical design linked.
Overview/Epidemiology
Congenital hand differences range from a small extra digit to complex bilateral syndromic limb deficiency. The presentation may be a newborn with an obvious anomaly, a toddler with delayed function, or a child referred for a specific problem such as syndactyly, thumb hypoplasia, clinodactyly or camptodactyly.
The consultation has two simultaneous tasks. First, explain the visible difference in language that parents can understand. Second, identify the functional and safety implications: Is the thumb useful? Are digits tethered? Is there enough skin for reconstruction? Is the pattern isolated, or does it suggest cardiac, renal, haematological, vertebral or genetic associations?
Most decisions are not urgent on the day of birth, but early referral matters. Families need counselling, the child may need therapy, and some conditions have timing windows. Border-digit syndactyly and severe thumb deficiency are examples where delaying assessment can reduce the quality of later function.
Pathophysiology
Upper limb development depends on coordinated patterning in several directions. The clinical value is practical: the developmental mechanism predicts what else may be abnormal besides the visible digit.
- Typical hand pattern
- Absent or hypoplastic structures such as radial deficiency, absent thumb or central ray deficiency.
- What to check clinically
- Forearm, wrist, thumb, elbow motion and associated systemic anomalies.
- Typical hand pattern
- Syndactyly, synostosis, camptodactyly and complex fusions.
- What to check clinically
- Skin shortage, neurovascular sharing, joint motion and growth tethering.
- Typical hand pattern
- Polydactyly and thumb duplication.
- What to check clinically
- Which ray has the best nail, joint, tendon, collateral ligament and alignment.
- Typical hand pattern
- Macrodactyly, abnormal soft tissue, nail or skeletal overgrowth.
- What to check clinically
- Progression, nerve symptoms, soft-tissue bulk and recurrence risk.
- Typical hand pattern
- Constriction rings, distal swelling, acrosyndactyly or amputations.
- What to check clinically
- Lymphoedema, vascularity, distal function and staged release need.
The anatomy is rarely just bone. Tendons, intrinsic muscles, digital nerves, vessels, collateral ligaments, nail folds and skin cover may all be abnormal. That is why congenital hand surgery is reconstructive surgery, not simply removal, release or straightening.
Classification
The Oberg-Manske-Tonkin system is useful because it organises congenital upper-limb differences into developmental groups. In clinical teaching, however, classification must be followed by a concrete anatomical description. A clear description is often more useful than a label alone.

- Malformations: absent, duplicated, separated or hypoplastic parts.
- Deformations: a formed part is bent, contracted or positioned abnormally.
- Dysplasias: abnormal tissue growth or quality, such as macrodactyly.
- Syndromes: hand findings are part of a wider multi-system condition.
Know that the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) classification (adopted by the IFSSH in 2014) replaced the older Swanson/IFSSH system that grouped anomalies as failure of formation, failure of differentiation/separation, duplication, overgrowth, undergrowth and constriction-band syndrome. OMT is dysmorphology-based with three top-level groups: (I) Malformations, (II) Deformations (e.g. trigger thumb, constriction ring, an extrinsically-bent formed part) and (III) Dysplasias (overgrowth such as macrodactyly, and tumorous conditions). The examinable refinement is that Malformations are subdivided by the developmental axis affected: the proximodistal axis (transverse/symbrachydactyly, radial/ulnar longitudinal deficiency), the radioulnar (anteroposterior) axis (radial deficiency/thumb hypoplasia, ulnar deficiency, radial/ulnar polydactyly) and the dorsoventral axis (nail-patella-type and dorsal-ventral defects) - and further by whether the whole limb or the hand plate alone is involved. Cite OMT in international exams, but always follow the label with a concrete anatomical description.
Clinical Presentation
Newborn presentation
Many congenital hand differences are visible at birth. Parents may be distressed and need clear, calm explanation. The first response should not be to name an operation. Explain that hand function depends on the thumb, digits, skin, joints, tendons, nerves and how the child learns to use the limb.
Later presentation
Some children present later because function becomes more obvious with development. A toddler may avoid pinch, struggle with grasp, catch a flexed finger, have progressive web tethering, or show increasing angular deformity as the digits grow. School-age children may present with writing difficulty, sport limitations, pain from a prominent duplicated ray, or concern about appearance and peer interaction.
History
- Ask specifically
- Prenatal scans, birth finding, unilateral or bilateral involvement and progression.
- Why it matters
- Separates isolated anomaly from broader developmental pattern.
- Ask specifically
- Family history, consanguinity where relevant, pregnancy exposures and syndromic clues.
- Why it matters
- Guides genetics referral and recurrence counselling.
- Ask specifically
- Feeding, cardiac history, renal anomalies, vertebral issues, haematological problems and other limb findings.
- Why it matters
- Prevents unsafe elective surgery when systemic disease is possible.
- Ask specifically
- Grasping blocks, holding utensils, dressing, toileting, writing, play, sport and bimanual tasks.
- Why it matters
- Defines the treatment goal better than appearance alone.
Examination
Observe spontaneous use first. Then examine both upper limbs from shoulder to fingertip.
- Assess
- Presence, stability, opposition, thenar function and web depth.
- Decision it informs
- Reconstruction versus pollicisation, and pinch potential.
- Assess
- Number, length, webbing, nail folds, duplicated parts and growth tethering.
- Decision it informs
- Timing of syndactyly or duplication reconstruction.
- Assess
- Passive motion, active motion, stability, contracture and tendon balance.
- Decision it informs
- Whether surgery can improve function without causing stiffness.
- Assess
- Skin shortage, scars, vascularity and sensibility where testable.
- Decision it informs
- Flap/graft planning, staged surgery and safety.
- Assess
- Wrist position, forearm length and elbow motion.
- Decision it informs
- Identifies longitudinal deficiency and associated treatment limits.
A child reaching for a toy often demonstrates opposition, grasp, release and bimanual strategy better than a formal command.
Investigations
Plain radiographs are the main investigation when skeletal anatomy will change treatment. Include the hand and often the wrist and forearm, especially when thumb hypoplasia or radial deficiency is suspected. In infants, some anatomy is cartilaginous, so repeat imaging later may be more informative.
Ultrasound or MRI is rarely first-line, but can be useful in selected complex cases if tendons, vessels, soft tissue or a mass-like component will change surgery. Genetic, cardiac, renal or haematological investigations should be targeted to the pattern rather than ordered indiscriminately.
- Investigation
- Hand, wrist and forearm radiographs.
- Decision it informs
- Defines duplicated, fused, absent or hypoplastic skeleton.
- Investigation
- Clinical assessment plus radiographs.
- Decision it informs
- Assesses CMC, MCP, first web and thenar function.
- Investigation
- Targeted paediatric, genetics, cardiac, renal or haematology review.
- Decision it informs
- Prevents unsafe elective surgery before systemic assessment.
- Investigation
- Therapy assessment and functional observation.
- Decision it informs
- Sets realistic goals and post-operative therapy plan.
Major Conditions
Syndactyly
Syndactyly is failure of separation between adjacent digits. It may be incomplete or complete. It may be simple when only soft tissue is involved, complex when bone or nail structures are fused, and complicated when additional skeletal anomalies exist. The ring-small finger web is commonly affected, but border-digit involvement is more urgent because unequal digit lengths can tether growth.

Polydactyly and thumb duplication
Polydactyly is an extra digit or ray. It may be preaxial, central or postaxial. Thumb duplication is commonly discussed with Wassel classification, but management depends on the function of the retained thumb: alignment, nail, joint stability, collateral ligaments, tendon insertions and first web space.

Thumb hypoplasia
Thumb hypoplasia ranges from mild small thumb to absent or floating thumb. Mild forms may need observation or first-web release. Reconstructable thumbs may need web deepening, opponensplasty and MCP stabilisation. Severe unstable or floating thumbs often function better after index pollicisation than after attempted preservation of a non-functional thumb.

Symbrachydactyly
Symbrachydactyly is usually sporadic and unilateral. It includes short digits, absent phalanges, nubbins, central deficiency and variable thumb involvement. The main task is counselling and functional support. Surgery may improve pinch space, length or grasp in selected children, but it cannot create a normal hand. Prosthetic, adaptive and therapy options should be discussed without framing them as inferior to surgery.
Cleft hand
Cleft hand is a central deficiency with absent central ray or rays and variable syndactyly. Some children have excellent function despite a dramatic appearance. Surgery is considered for first web narrowing, transverse bones, progressive deformity, unstable pinch, syndactyly or functional limitations. The plan should protect the thumb-index pinch space.

Camptodactyly, clinodactyly and trigger thumb
- Clinical focus
- PIP flexion deformity, flexibility, progression and functional limitation.
- Usual treatment logic
- Observe or splint mild flexible cases; consider surgery only for severe or progressive functional contracture.
- Clinical focus
- Coronal-plane curvature, often from delta phalanx, plus function and cosmesis.
- Usual treatment logic
- Usually observe; corrective osteotomy is reserved for severe deformity or functional interference.
- Clinical focus
- IP flexion, palpable Notta nodule, reducibility, age and duration.
- Usual treatment logic
- Many early cases are observed; persistent fixed triggering may need A1 pulley release.
An overview must include Madelung deformity, a growth-disturbance dysplasia of the volar-ulnar distal radial physis presenting in adolescent girls (often bilateral) with a dorsally-prominent (subluxed) ulnar head, a "bayonet" wrist, pain and limited rotation/extension. The radius develops increased volar and ulnar inclination with a triangulated, proximally-migrated lunate sitting in the resulting V. It is classically tethered by an abnormal Vickers ligament (a thick volar radiolunate ligament) and is strongly associated with SHOX-gene haploinsufficiency / Léri-Weill dyschondrosteosis (and seen in Turner syndrome) - so it is a marker for short stature and a genetics cue. Management ranges from observation to Vickers ligament release with physiolysis (Vickers procedure) in the growing child, and dome or radial osteotomy with ulnar shortening for the mature symptomatic wrist. A reverse Madelung (dorsal-ulnar tethering, post-traumatic or infective) is the differential.
Differential Diagnosis
The hand difference is often obvious; the exam skill is distinguishing patterns that look similar but carry different prognosis, screening needs and surgical plans. The two highest-stakes distinctions are isolated versus syndromic syndactyly, and a deficient central ray (cleft hand) versus transverse or symbrachydactyly deficiency.
- Distinguishing features
- Soft-tissue web only, normal nails and skeleton, no systemic features.
- Key action
- Plan web reconstruction; timing by border versus central.
- Distinguishing features
- Complex or complicated webs, craniofacial features (Apert) or absent pectoralis and limb hypoplasia (Poland).
- Key action
- Genetics and systemic assessment before staged surgery.
- Distinguishing features
- Extra radial digit with shared or duplicated joints; assess best ray.
- Key action
- Reconstruct retained ray, do not simply amputate.
- Distinguishing features
- Extra ulnar digit; often familial, more common in African ancestry.
- Key action
- Excise with collateral ligament reconstruction if well-formed.
- Distinguishing features
- Small or absent thumb, radial wrist deviation, short forearm.
- Key action
- Mandatory cardiac, renal and haematology (Fanconi, TAR) screen.
- Distinguishing features
- Central V-shaped cleft, absent central ray, often good function.
- Key action
- Protect thumb-index pinch; operate for first-web or function.
- Distinguishing features
- Short or absent digits with nubbins, usually unilateral and sporadic.
- Key action
- Counsel; prosthetic or toe transfer in selected cases.
- Distinguishing features
- Constriction rings, distal swelling, acrosyndactyly, normal proximal anatomy.
- Key action
- Assess vascularity; urgent release if circulation threatened.
- Distinguishing features
- Enlarged digit, may be progressive, nerve-territory distribution.
- Key action
- Monitor progression; debulking or epiphysiodesis if needed.
- Distinguishing features
- Isolated flexion or angular deformity without true deficiency or duplication.
- Key action
- Mostly observe; surgery only for progressive functional loss.
Management Principles
Management begins with honest counselling. The family should understand the diagnosis, what function is present, what treatment can improve, and what surgery cannot change. Many children benefit from therapy, adaptive strategies and observation. Surgery is chosen when it improves function, prevents deformity, supports development or solves a specific practical problem.
- Timing logic
- Earlier planning because unequal digit lengths can tether growth.
- Main treatment decision
- Release the web with durable commissure reconstruction and safe skin cover.
- Timing logic
- Often can wait until the child is larger and tissue handling is safer.
- Main treatment decision
- Release when function, growth, family goals and surgical safety align.
- Timing logic
- Early assessment because pinch development and radial deficiency screening matter.
- Main treatment decision
- Reconstruct a stable thumb if possible; pollicise when the thumb is absent, floating or non-reconstructable.
- Timing logic
- Plan once anatomy, nail, joint stability and tendon balance are defined.
- Main treatment decision
- Build the best single ray; do not simply amputate the smaller part.
- Timing logic
- Observe mild flexible deformity; intervene for progression or function.
- Main treatment decision
- Splint, therapy or osteotomy/release only when the deformity justifies stiffness and scar risk.
- Timing logic
- Stage surgery so the child keeps useful function during recovery.
- Main treatment decision
- Protect feeding, toileting, mobility, play and family care capacity.
Observation is appropriate when function is good, deformity is mild, or surgery is unlikely to improve the hand. Therapy supports range, splinting, sensory use, bimanual skill and post-operative recovery. Adaptive tools may be more useful than surgery for some tasks.
Operative Concepts
- Core technical idea
- Create a durable commissure, separate digits with zig-zag incisions, protect neurovascular bundles and close without tension using flaps or full-thickness graft when needed.
- Major pitfall
- Linear scars, inadequate skin, web creep, vascular compromise and stiffness.
- Core technical idea
- Build one straight, stable, sensate digit by choosing the best skeletal, ligament, tendon and nail components.
- Major pitfall
- Treating it as simple amputation and leaving instability, malalignment or nail deformity.
- Core technical idea
- Rotate, shorten and reposition the index finger while preserving neurovascular supply and balancing tendons to create opposition.
- Major pitfall
- Trying to preserve a floating non-functional thumb when pollicisation would give better pinch.
- Core technical idea
- Reserve surgery for progressive or functionally important deformity and combine with therapy.
- Major pitfall
- Creating stiffness or recurrence by operating on mild flexible deformity.
Complications
Early complications
- Skin graft loss or flap edge necrosis.
- Vascular compromise after complex digit separation.
- Infection or wound breakdown.
- Scar sensitivity and pain.
- Stiffness after immobilisation.
- Family distress if expectations were not clear.
Late complications
- Web creep after syndactyly release.
- Scar contracture and limited motion.
- Angular deformity or instability after polydactyly reconstruction.
- Poor pinch after inadequate thumb reconstruction.
- Growth-related recurrence.
- Need for revision surgery.
- Dissatisfaction if appearance was over-promised.
In congenital hand surgery, a technically successful operation that creates stiffness, poor sensibility or unstable pinch is not a functional success.
Counselling and Follow-up
- How to explain it
- Explain what the hand can already do and what treatment may realistically improve.
- Follow-up focus
- Pinch, grasp, release, bimanual skill and independence.
- How to explain it
- Avoid promising a normal-looking hand; scars and residual difference are common.
- Follow-up focus
- Child confidence, peer concerns and family expectations.
- How to explain it
- Some children need therapy, splints, one operation, revision or staged reconstruction.
- Follow-up focus
- Growth, web creep, angular deformity and therapy progress.
- How to explain it
- Discuss stiffness, scar sensitivity, graft problems, vascular risk and recurrence before elective surgery.
- Follow-up focus
- Early wound review and long-term functional review.
Decision-Making in Practice
Congenital hand assessment should begin with function rather than appearance. The key questions are whether the child can pinch, grasp, release, oppose, feel, play, perform self-care and participate socially. Anatomy matters because it determines whether reconstruction can improve function without creating stiffness, scarring or repeated operations that add little value.
- Assessment focus
- Stability, active motion, first web, thenar function and family goals
- Treatment direction
- Pollicisation when the thumb cannot become a useful post
- Assessment focus
- Border digits, complex bony union, nail involvement and growth asymmetry
- Treatment direction
- Earlier release for border digits or progressive deformity; staged release for multiple webs
- Assessment focus
- Duplication pattern, joint stability, tendon balance and nail complex
- Treatment direction
- Remove or reconstruct the less useful ray while preserving alignment and stability
- Assessment focus
- Wrist position, thumb function, elbow motion, forearm length and syndromic associations
- Treatment direction
- Therapy, splintage and staged reconstruction depending severity and child function
- Assessment focus
- Available sensate digits, web spaces, toe transfer suitability and prosthetic needs
- Treatment direction
- Function-led reconstruction, prosthetics or observation
Classification helps communication, but it should not replace a hand-by-hand functional plan.
- Practical meaning
- Create or preserve a thumb or pinch post that the child can use.
- Failure mode
- Straight-looking hand with poor opposition or no stability.
- Practical meaning
- Deepen or protect the web when thumb-index span limits pinch.
- Failure mode
- Good-looking thumb that cannot oppose because the web is narrow.
- Practical meaning
- Release tethering tissue early when growth will worsen deformity; avoid scars that contract across joints.
- Failure mode
- Web creep, angular deformity or recurrent contracture.
- Practical meaning
- Stage procedures when blood supply, skin coverage or bilateral function makes one-stage surgery unsafe.
- Failure mode
- Vascular compromise or loss of independence during recovery.
- Practical meaning
- Plan splinting, motion and functional retraining before operating.
- Failure mode
- Technically correct surgery followed by stiffness and poor use.
Clinical Reasoning Notes
Structured clinical approach
Start with the child's age, side, function and pattern. Then describe the anatomy: thumb, web spaces, number of rays, digits involved, joints, skin, nail and forearm. State whether the condition is isolated or syndromic. Finally, give a plan for investigation, counselling, therapy and timing.
Common pitfalls
- Starting with an operation instead of function.
- Saying "remove the extra digit" without reconstructing the retained ray.
- Treating all syndactyly with the same timing.
- Missing radial deficiency or haematology risk in thumb hypoplasia.
- Preserving a non-functional thumb when pollicisation would give better pinch.
- Ignoring the first web space.
- Promising normal appearance.
- Forgetting therapy and revision risk.
Integrated clinical approach
"I would assess the child in a paediatric hand clinic. I would first observe spontaneous function, then describe the thumb, digits, web spaces, skin, joints, tendons, sensibility and forearm. I would classify the pattern but base management on functional goals, growth and associated anomalies. Treatment may be observation, therapy, reconstruction or pollicisation, with timing chosen to support development while minimising stiffness, scarring and revision risk."
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Congenital hand surgery is delivered very differently across high- and limited-resource settings, but the functional principles are universal. There is no single global guideline; practice is shaped by specialist society reviews, classification consensus and national registries.
- Approximate figure
- Roughly 1 to 2 per 1000 live births
- Source population / note
- Population registry estimates vary with ascertainment and minor-anomaly inclusion.
- Approximate figure
- Among the most common; postaxial more frequent in African ancestry, preaxial in East Asian and European ancestry
- Source population / note
- Ancestry-dependent distribution is a recognised exam point.
- Approximate figure
- Around 1 in 2000 to 3000 births
- Source population / note
- Often the ring-small or long-ring web; can be syndromic (Apert, Poland).
- Approximate figure
- Around 1 in 30,000 to 100,000
- Source population / note
- Two-thirds have associated anomalies; mandatory systemic screen.
- Emphasis
- Dysmorphology-based grouping adopted as the global standard since 2014.
- Practical implication
- Use OMT terminology in international exams and correspondence.
- Emphasis
- Function-led assessment, staged reconstruction and early referral for border-digit and thumb deficiency.
- Practical implication
- Refer neonatal anomalies early to a specialist congenital hand service.
- Emphasis
- Reconstruct the retained ray; protect neurovascular bundles and the first web.
- Practical implication
- Avoid framing duplication surgery as simple amputation.
- Emphasis
- Screen radial deficiency for Fanconi anaemia (chromosomal breakage) and TAR before surgery.
- Practical implication
- Haematology clearance can change anaesthetic and surgical timing.
- High-resource setting
- Antenatal ultrasound, early genetics and multidisciplinary clinic.
- Limited-resource setting
- Often first seen at walking age or school entry; late presentation common.
- High-resource setting
- Microsurgery, toe transfer and staged web reconstruction available.
- Limited-resource setting
- Focus on high-impact, single-stage procedures and durable web release.
- High-resource setting
- Hand therapy, custom splints and myoelectric prostheses accessible.
- Limited-resource setting
- Adaptive low-cost devices and family-led therapy emphasised.
- High-resource setting
- Long-term growth and revision review routine.
- Limited-resource setting
- Single definitive procedure prioritised where follow-up is uncertain.
Controversies and Areas of Uncertainty
Even at consultant level, several decisions in congenital hand surgery remain genuinely contested. Examiners reward a candidate who can name the controversy, give both sides and then commit to a defensible position.
- One side
- Early release (before 12-18 months) limits growth tethering of border webs and gives a longer remodelling period.
- Other side
- Later release allows larger structures, easier dissection and lower anaesthetic and vascular risk for non-border webs.
- One side
- An unstable carpometacarpal joint usually dooms reconstruction, so pollicisation gives more reliable pinch.
- Other side
- Some surgeons and families prefer to preserve a five-digit hand and accept a weaker but present thumb.
- One side
- Full-thickness grafts reliably resurface defects and are the traditional standard.
- Other side
- Defatting, local flaps and dermal substitutes can avoid donor sites and graft pigmentation in selected webs.
- One side
- Centralisation or radialisation improves wrist alignment and hand position.
- Other side
- High recurrence, ulnar growth arrest and stiffness lead some to favour soft-tissue distraction or vascularised transfers.
- One side
- Bilhaut preserves combined width and joint stability for symmetric duplicates.
- Other side
- It risks nail ridging and joint stiffness, so most use ablation of the smaller ray with reconstruction.
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A newborn is referred with an abnormal hand. How do you assess and counsel the family?”
“Why is border-digit syndactyly usually released earlier than central simple syndactyly?”
“A child has a very small unstable thumb. How do you decide between reconstruction and pollicisation?”
“A toddler has a duplicated thumb with two similar-sized radial digits. The family asks you to remove the extra one. How do you plan surgery?”
Assess
- Watch function
- Describe anatomy
- Thumb and web
- Whole upper limb
- Associated screen
Classify
- Malformation
- Deformation
- Dysplasia
- Syndrome
- Condition-specific system
Treat
- Observe
- Therapy
- Web reconstruction
- Ray reconstruction
- Pollicisation
Pitfalls
- Cosmetic-only plan
- No systemic screen
- Web creep
- Unstable retained ray
- Poor pinch
Evidence Signals
OMT classification: dysmorphology-based framework
- The Oberg-Manske-Tonkin system separates malformations, deformations and dysplasias using dysmorphological concepts.
- Malformations are subgrouped by whether the hand alone or the whole limb is affected and by the axis of development involved.
- The framework is expandable so that future gene and chromosomal defects can be incorporated.
Epidemiology of congenital upper-limb anomalies (OMT applied)
- 641 children with 653 anomalies were classified across three centres over one year; 74% were malformations.
- Among hand-plate malformations, radial polydactyly (15%) was most common, then symbrachydactyly (13%) and cleft hand (11%).
- All individuals could be classified with OMT, though Madelung deformity and symbrachydactyly needed clarification.
Evidence Base
Radial polydactyly: physical-characteristic classification
- Across 545 thumbs in 500 patients, ulnar-dominant duplication was most frequent (67.5%) and the hypoplastic type accounted for 14.5%.
- Excision with reconstruction was needed in 73.9% and simple excision in only 24.8%, confirming most duplicates require reconstruction not amputation.
- Stratifying by floating, symmetry, dominant side and joint angulation predicted the operation as well as the radiographic Wassel-Flatt system.
Syndactyly web reconstruction: dorsal flap technique
- 39 webs were reconstructed in 26 children using a hexagonal dorsal flap with mid-lateral closure; grafts were needed in only 2 complex or complicated cases.
- Web creep occurred in a single child after a self-induced postoperative infection, underscoring that closure technique and wound integrity drive outcome.
- Mean parental cosmetic and functional satisfaction scores were 87 and 92 of 100 at 1.3 years.
Pollicisation for thumb aplasia and severe hypoplasia
- 13 index pollicisations (Blauth IIIB, IV and V thumbs) were assessed at a mean 6.5 years; mean Percival score was 18 of 22.
- Pollicisation reliably created a sensate, mobile thumb with satisfactory strength and appearance in the majority of children.
- Transient psychosocial discomfort was reported, reinforcing the need for family counselling alongside the technical result.
Radial longitudinal deficiency: associations and treatment
- About two-thirds of children with radial longitudinal deficiency have an associated medical or musculoskeletal disorder, and one-third have a recognised syndrome.
- Centralisation and radialisation improve wrist position but carry high recurrence and ulnar growth-arrest rates.
- Microsurgical options (vascularised fibula or second-toe transfer) and management of the associated hypoplastic thumb are evolving alternatives.