Hangman's Fracture

View larger

The C2 Pars Fracture

Hangman's fracture (traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2) is a bilateral fracture through the pars interarticularis of the axis. The term derives from the similar fracture pattern caused by judicial hanging, though modern cases are typically from motor vehicle accidents.

Historical Context

Sir Geoffrey Jefferson first described the mechanism in 1927, relating it to judicial hanging. In judicial hanging:

• Drop causes hyperextension and distraction
• Bilateral pars fractures occur
• Spinal cord transection at C2 level
• Death from respiratory arrest (phrenic nerve C3-5)

Modern Hangman's fractures differ - lower energy, variable mechanisms, rarely cause death.

View larger

C2 Vertebral Anatomy

The axis (C2) has unique anatomy:

Biomechanics of Injury

Classic Mechanism (Types I, II, III) - Hyperextension + Axial Load:

1. Forehead strikes dashboard or object
2. Neck forced into hyperextension
3. Axial load transmitted through cervical spine
4. Pars interarticularis fractures bilaterally (weakest point)
5. Variable translation of C2 body on C3

Type IIA Mechanism - Flexion-Distraction:

1. Different mechanism - flexion injury
2. Distraction forces rather than compression
3. Minimal translation but severe angulation
4. Disc disruption between C2-C3
5. CRITICAL: Traction contraindicated

Levine-Edwards Classification

The most widely used classification system, based on mechanism and radiographic parameters:

Radiographic Examples

View larger

History

Key mechanism features:

• MVA: Dashboard injury, forehead strike
• Fall: Onto head or face (hyperextension)
• Diving: Impact with head
• Sports: Contact sports, gymnastics
• Type IIA clue: Flexion mechanism history

Associated symptoms:

• Neck pain (posterior, radiating to occiput)
• Limited range of motion
• Headache
• Neurological symptoms (rare - 6%)

Physical Examination

Examination findings:

• Inspection: Cervical collar in place, facial/forehead trauma
• Palpation: Posterior midline tenderness at C2 level
• Neurological: Full motor/sensory exam (usually normal)
• Associated injuries: Head trauma, facial fractures common

Red Flags for Neurological Injury

Though rare, neurological injury can occur:

• Complete cord injury from judicial hanging mechanism
• Type III with cord compression
• Associated injuries (disc herniation, facet locking)
• Vertebral artery injury

Differential Diagnosis

A C2 ring lucency on imaging is not always a classic hangman's fracture; the distinction changes management and neurological risk.

Algorithm

View larger

Special Considerations

Elderly Patients:

• Higher fall mechanism
• May have osteoporosis
• Halo complications higher (pin loosening, infection)
• Consider collar for stable patterns
• Lower threshold for surgery if unstable

Associated Injuries:

• Head trauma common (forehead impact)
• Facial fractures
• Other cervical fractures (C1 Jefferson, C3)
• Assess entire cervical spine with CT

Overview

Hangman's fractures have relatively low complication rates compared to other cervical spine injuries, primarily due to the "auto-decompression" effect. However, specific complications can occur based on fracture type and treatment method.

Non-union

Incidence: 5-10% overall (higher in Type II/III, rare in Type I)

Risk Factors:

• Inadequate immobilization duration
• Poor patient compliance
• Smoking and diabetes
• Severe initial displacement

Management:

• Asymptomatic: observation
• Symptomatic: C2-C3 fusion (anterior or posterior)

Malunion

Patterns: Kyphotic deformity, residual translation, Type IIA treated in flexion

Management:

• Conservative if asymptomatic
• Corrective osteotomy and fusion if severe

Vertebral Artery Injury

Incidence: Rare (less than 5%), usually asymptomatic

Diagnosis: CTA cervical spine for high-energy injuries

Management: Observation, antiplatelet therapy, rarely endovascular intervention

Neurological Complications

Incidence: Overall 6%, highest in Type III (10-15%)

Pattern: Usually present at time of injury, delayed deterioration very rare

Management: Maintain alignment, surgical decompression if indicated

Halo Vest Complications

Incidence: 10-30%, higher in elderly

Types:

• Pin site infections (10-20%)
• Pin loosening (5-15%)
• Respiratory complications
• Skin breakdown
• Dysphagia

Management: Pin care, early recognition, may require early halo removal

Immediate Postoperative Period

Day 0-3:

• ICU or high-dependency monitoring if neurologically intact
• Cervical collar or halo vest immobilization
• Neurological checks every 2-4 hours
• Pain management (multimodal analgesia)
• DVT prophylaxis (mechanical and chemical)
• Early mobilization when stable

Immobilization Protocol

After Fusion Surgery:

• Hard cervical collar for 6-8 weeks (anterior fusion alone)
• Halo vest for 8-12 weeks (posterior fusion or combined)
• Serial radiographs at 2, 6, 12 weeks
• CT at 12 weeks to assess fusion

After Non-operative Treatment:

• Collar: 8-12 weeks for Type I
• Halo: 8-12 weeks for Type II/IIA
• Flexion-extension radiographs at 12 weeks

Follow-up Schedule

Rehabilitation

Phase 1 (0-6 weeks):

• Maintain immobilization
• Upper extremity exercises (shoulder, elbow)
• Core strengthening (no neck movement)
• Gait training with collar/halo

Phase 2 (6-12 weeks):

• Gradual collar/halo weaning
• Gentle active ROM exercises
• Progressive strengthening
• Proprioceptive training

Phase 3 (3-6 months):

• Full ROM restoration
• Advanced strengthening
• Sport-specific training (if appropriate)
• Return to work assessment

Return to Activity Guidelines

Overall Outcomes

Hangman's fractures have generally excellent outcomes when appropriately treated:

Type I:

• Near 100% union rate with collar
• Full return to function expected
• Minimal long-term neck pain (less than 10%)
• Excellent prognosis

Type II:

• 90-95% union rate with halo
• Good functional outcomes
• Some patients have mild chronic neck pain (20-30%)
• Non-union rate 5-10% (may require late surgery)

Type IIA:

• Good outcomes if recognized and treated correctly
• Key is avoiding traction
• Union rates similar to Type II with correct management
• May have more neck stiffness than Type I

Type III:

• Variable outcomes
• Highest rate of neurological injury (10-15%)
• Surgery usually achieves stable fusion (greater than 85%)
• Loss of C2-C3 motion segment
• May have persistent neck pain (30-40%)

Functional Outcomes

Predictors of Poor Outcomes

Factors associated with worse long-term outcomes:

• Type III injuries (highest complication rate)
• Elderly patients (greater than 65 years)
• Neurological injury at presentation
• Delayed diagnosis or treatment
• Non-compliance with immobilization protocol
• High-energy mechanism
• Smoking and comorbidities

High-Yield Facts for MCQs

Classification:

• Type I: less than 3mm translation, minimal angulation, collar treatment
• Type II: greater than 3mm translation, significant angulation, halo treatment
• Type IIA: minimal translation (less than 3mm) but severe angulation (greater than 11 degrees), NO TRACTION
• Type III: facet dislocation, surgical treatment

Key Measurements:

• 3mm: threshold between Type I and Type II translation
• 11 degrees: threshold for Type IIA angulation
• 8-12 weeks: typical immobilization duration

Mechanism:

• Type I, II, III: hyperextension with axial loading
• Type IIA: flexion-distraction (opposite mechanism)
• Judicial hanging: hyperextension + distraction (usually fatal)

Neurological Injury:

• Overall rate: approximately 6%
• Explained by "auto-decompression" - canal expands
• Type III has highest risk
• Bilateral pars fractures allow posterior elements to separate

Type IIA Critical Points:

• TRACTION IS CONTRAINDICATED
• Halo applied in EXTENSION position
• Flexion-distraction mechanism
• Angulation out of proportion to translation
• Most commonly tested pitfall in exams

Surgical Indications:

• Type III (facet dislocation)
• Failed non-operative management
• Irreducible Type II
• Patient unable to tolerate halo
• Non-union after appropriate immobilization

Imaging:

• Lateral cervical radiograph: key view
• Measure both translation AND angulation
• CT: fracture pattern, facet alignment
• MRI: disc disruption, cord, ligaments

Common Exam Traps

1. Type IIA traction: Most common mistake - traction worsens injury
2. Neurological injury rate: Not high despite "unstable" fracture
3. Measurement confusion: Must measure BOTH translation and angulation
4. Mechanism confusion: Type IIA is flexion, not extension
5. Surgical timing: Type III needs surgery, not all Hangman's fractures
6. Collar vs halo: Type I gets collar, Type II gets halo
7. Union rates: Generally excellent with appropriate treatment

MCQ Stems to Expect

• "A patient has C2 pars fracture with 2mm translation and 15-degree angulation. What is the classification and management?"
• "What explains the low neurological injury rate in Hangman's fractures?"
• "What is contraindicated in Type IIA Hangman's fracture?"
• "A Type III Hangman's fracture is characterized by..."
• "What is the most appropriate initial immobilization for a Type II Hangman's fracture?"

Global Epidemiology

• Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis ("hangman's fracture") accounts for approximately 4-7% of all cervical spine fractures and is the second most common axis fracture after the odontoid (Francis et al., J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981, PMID 7263740; Cai et al., Emerg Radiol 2022, PMID 35543854).
• Bimodal age distribution: high-energy motor vehicle collisions in younger adults and low-energy falls in older adults. Recent level-1 trauma-centre data report a mean age of 62.7 years, reflecting an ageing injured population (Cai et al., 2022, PMID 35543854).
• Neurological injury is uncommon (historically approximately 6%) because the bilateral pars fracture tends to decompress rather than narrow the canal; the main exceptions are Type III, atypical posterior-body fractures, and high-energy distraction (Starr & Eismont, Spine 1993, PMID 8272942).

Guideline & Classification Comparison

Registry & Synthesised Evidence

• The largest systematic review (25 studies, 548 fractures) found non-operative union of 94.1% versus 99.4% surgically, with no mortality difference and both anterior and posterior approaches achieving high fusion (Murphy et al., J Orthop Trauma 2017, PMID 28816880).
• For low-grade fractures, a rigid collar matched halo immobilisation for union, with no demonstrable advantage of the halo and lower morbidity - particularly relevant for older patients (Al-Mahfoudh et al., Global Spine J 2015, PMID 27099816).
• There are no national hangman's-fracture–specific arthroplasty/registry datasets (unlike joint replacement); evidence is dominated by retrospective series and pooled reviews, so guidance remains at the level of practice options rather than standards (Hadley et al., 2002, PMID 12431297).

Practice Variation

• Immobilisation device: Halo use has declined in many high-income centres in favour of rigid collars for stable patterns, driven by halo morbidity (pin-site infection, loosening, pneumonia) especially in the elderly.
• Operative threshold: Surgeons increasingly favour early fixation for Type II with marked translation/angulation and for Type III, citing higher union and faster mobilisation; halo-based non-operative care remains standard for Type I and many Type II/IIA fractures.
• Vascular screening: High-grade fractures (Type IIA/III) warrant CT angiography for blunt cerebrovascular injury and brain imaging, given the markedly higher rates of vertebral artery injury and traumatic brain injury (Cai et al., 2022, PMID 35543854).