Physis | articular surface | CT | 2 mm threshold | growth surveillance
- The distal tibial physis closes asymmetrically. Central closure occurs first, then medial, then lateral; this creates Tillaux and triplane patterns.
- Plain radiographs can underestimate displacement. CT is important for intra-articular and transitional fractures.
- Greater than 2 mm intra-articular gap or step is the practical threshold for anatomical reduction in Tillaux, triplane and SH-III/IV patterns; at the medial malleolus physeal bars can form even inside 2 mm, so aim for anatomical.
- Repeated forceful reductions can harm the physis. If tissue blocks reduction, change strategy rather than persist.
- Growth arrest is not rare in high-risk patterns. Medial malleolus and high-energy distal tibial physeal injuries need surveillance.
- “Ask for AP, mortise and true lateral ankle views; add tibia/fibula views when proximal pain or syndesmotic concern exists.
- “Tillaux is an anterolateral epiphyseal avulsion by the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament.
- “Triplane is a multiplanar SH-IV pattern: epiphyseal, physeal and metaphyseal components.
- “A medial malleolus SH-III/IV fracture is a growth-arrest risk even after apparently good reduction.
Overview/Epidemiology
Paediatric ankle fractures account for about 5% of all paediatric fractures, and the distal tibial physis is one of the most important lower-limb growth plates injured in children. Management is high-stakes because the same injury can affect the joint surface, the physis or both.
Presentation. The typical patient is a child or adolescent with ankle pain, swelling and inability to weight bear after a twisting injury, a fall, a sports injury or higher-energy trauma.
Not an adult ankle. In children the ligament may remain intact while the physis or epiphysis fails. In adolescents, asymmetric closure of the distal tibial physis creates transitional injuries, the Tillaux and triplane fractures.
A child with an ankle fracture has a physis, partly closing growth plate and different failure points. The adult question is often syndesmosis and malleoli; the paediatric question is physis, articular surface, remaining growth, reduction quality and growth arrest.
Work through the same questions in the same order for every injured paediatric ankle, safety first and follow-up last.
- What To Check
- Open injury, threatened or tented skin, swelling, pulses, sensation, vascular compromise, pain escalation and compartment concern.
- Action
- Escalate urgently before routine fracture planning; unsafe soft tissues or compartment concern override routine casting pathways.
- What To Check
- Fibular, distal tibial physeal, medial malleolus, Tillaux or triplane? Adolescent age, an external rotation mechanism, an anterolateral epiphyseal fragment or multiplanar geometry point to a transitional fracture.
- Action
- Classify by physis and joint involvement.
- What To Check
- Mortise view, articular step or gap, SH-III/IV pattern, Tillaux or triplane fracture. Can plain radiographs define the joint surface and fracture geometry?
- Action
- Intra-articular incongruity usually needs CT and anatomical reduction; in transitional fractures CT planning determines whether casting, percutaneous fixation or open reduction is safest.
- What To Check
- Displacement, angulation, rotation, residual gap and tissue interposition. Are alignment, physis and articular surface acceptable?
- Action
- Displaced physeal injuries need reduction; blocked or unstable reductions may need fixation. Cast, reduce, percutaneously fix or open depending on displacement and stability.
- What To Check
- Chronological age, skeletal maturity, remaining distal tibial growth, fracture type and any high-risk medial malleolus injury.
- Action
- Higher remaining growth increases the importance of growth-arrest surveillance and counselling; monitor for physeal bar, angular deformity and leg-length difference.
Surgically Relevant Anatomy
The distal tibial physis. It contributes meaningfully to tibial growth and closes asymmetrically: centrally first, then medially, laterally last. During this transition the partially closed physis cannot dissipate rotational force evenly.
Where the transitional fractures come from. The anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) attaches to the anterolateral distal tibial epiphysis. When the medial physis is closing and the lateral physis remains open, external rotation can avulse that anterolateral epiphyseal fragment, which is the Tillaux pattern. If the fracture propagates through the epiphysis, physis and metaphysis in different planes, the result is a triplane fracture.
The distal tibia and fibula. The distal tibia carries both a physis and a joint surface, so reduction must protect growth and articular congruity together. The distal fibula is often lower-risk, but do not miss a syndesmotic injury, physeal displacement or an associated distal tibial injury.
The medial malleolus. SH-III and SH-IV fractures here cross the epiphysis and physis and can damage the germinal layer. These medial injuries carry meaningful physeal-bar risk and need longer surveillance. Because the medial distal tibial physis can form a physeal bar, even small residual displacement may matter, and "small" here means smaller than the usual 2 mm rule. The numbers are set out under Investigations.
Pathophysiology
The injury pattern depends on the child's age, the mechanism and the stage of physeal closure.
Anchor the whole topic to a date. The distal tibial physis typically closes at about age 14 in girls and 16 in boys, and transitional fractures occur in the roughly 18-month window immediately before that closure completes. The window is therefore approximately 12.5 to 14 years in girls and 14.5 to 16 in boys.
Why the age matters. The same external-rotation force produces a physeal separation in a younger child, a Tillaux or triplane fracture in this narrow band, and an adult ankle fracture afterwards. That is why a "sprain" in a 13-year-old girl or a 15-year-old boy deserves more scepticism than the same story at 9 or at 19.
These ages are population averages rather than rules. Skeletal maturity varies by roughly two years either side of chronological age, so use the radiograph in front of you to judge how much physis is still open.
- Typical Pattern
- Distal fibular physeal injury or medial distal tibial injury depending force and age.
- Management Consequence
- Examine both malleoli; do not assume lateral pain means simple sprain.
- Typical Pattern
- Tillaux or triplane fracture during asymmetric distal tibial physeal closure.
- Management Consequence
- CT defines the fragment and articular displacement.
- Typical Pattern
- Displaced distal tibial physeal injury, SH-IV fracture or complex triplane pattern.
- Management Consequence
- Higher risk of growth disturbance and worse functional outcome.
- Typical Pattern
- Medial malleolus SH-III/IV fracture.
- Management Consequence
- Anatomical reduction and growth-arrest surveillance are central.
Classification
Salter-Harris. The classification relates the fracture line to the physis, metaphysis and epiphysis. In the distal tibia, types III and IV cross the articular surface, and type V, a compression injury, may only become evident when growth disturbance develops.

Tillaux and triplane fractures are described by their fragments, and the Dias-Tachdjian system by the mechanism of injury.
- Pattern
- Through the physis; may be radiographically subtle.
- Treatment Meaning
- Treat displacement and clinical tenderness; follow if distal tibia involved.
- Pattern
- Physis plus metaphyseal fragment.
- Treatment Meaning
- Closed reduction if displaced; open if tissue blocks reduction.
- Pattern
- Epiphyseal intra-articular fracture extending to physis.
- Treatment Meaning
- CT and anatomical reduction if displaced.
- Pattern
- Epiphysis, physis and metaphysis.
- Treatment Meaning
- CT-defined reduction and fixation; growth arrest risk.
- Pattern
- Crush injury to physis, often diagnosed late.
- Treatment Meaning
- High suspicion and growth surveillance.

Clinical Assessment
History. Establish the mechanism and energy, the ability to weight bear, the exact site of pain and the time since injury. Ask about any reduction attempt, an open wound, skin tenting, paraesthesia and a previous ankle injury. Sporting adolescents with external rotation mechanisms are the classic group for transitional fractures.
Examination. Look, feel and move, then check the neurovascular status and the compartments.
- How To Do It
- Inspect swelling, bruising, deformity, skin tenting, open wounds and foot position.
- Positive Finding
- Threatened skin, open injury or marked deformity needs urgent reduction or operative escalation.
- How To Do It
- Palpate distal tibial physis, medial malleolus, lateral malleolus, syndesmosis, proximal fibula, base of fifth metatarsal and midfoot.
- Positive Finding
- Focal physeal or medial malleolar tenderness changes imaging and follow-up.
- How To Do It
- Assess active toe motion and gentle ankle motion only if safe; do not stress a displaced fracture.
- Positive Finding
- Painful block or gross instability supports significant fracture or joint involvement.
- How To Do It
- Check dorsalis pedis/posterior tibial pulses, capillary refill, sensation in superficial/deep peroneal, tibial, sural and saphenous distributions.
- Positive Finding
- Document before and after reduction.
- How To Do It
- Assess escalating pain, pain with passive toe stretch, tense compartments and analgesic requirement.
- Positive Finding
- Compartment concern is an emergency even if the X-ray looks manageable.
The differential. The trap in children is the radiographically subtle injury. A tender physis with a "normal" film is a fracture until proven otherwise, and a presumed sprain in a skeletally immature ankle should be treated with suspicion.
- Discriminating Features
- Focal physeal tenderness with a near-normal radiograph in a younger child after inversion.
- How To Confirm or Exclude
- Clinical diagnosis; treat tenderness over the physis as a fracture and review; MRI only if symptoms persist.
- Discriminating Features
- Tenderness anterior to and below the malleolus rather than over the physis, usually an older adolescent.
- How To Confirm or Exclude
- More likely once the physis has closed; do not over-call sprain when physeal tenderness is present.
- Discriminating Features
- Adolescent, external rotation, anterolateral epiphyseal tenderness.
- How To Confirm or Exclude
- Mortise radiograph plus CT for the anterolateral fragment and articular gap.
- Discriminating Features
- Adolescent with multiplanar pain; the metaphyseal fragment may be missed on the AP view.
- How To Confirm or Exclude
- CT defines epiphyseal, physeal and metaphyseal components.
- Discriminating Features
- Medial joint-line tenderness, intra-articular line on the mortise view.
- How To Confirm or Exclude
- CT for displacement; flag for growth-arrest surveillance.
- Discriminating Features
- Persistent deep ankle pain, catching or effusion after a twist with normal alignment.
- How To Confirm or Exclude
- MRI; consider when symptoms outlast the expected fracture or sprain course.
- Discriminating Features
- Proximal fibular tenderness with a syndesmotic or medial ankle injury.
- How To Confirm or Exclude
- Full-length tibia/fibula radiographs; check medial clear space and syndesmosis.
Investigations
What to request. Start with AP, mortise and true lateral ankle radiographs, and add further studies when the findings call for them:
- Tibia/fibula views if proximal fibular pain, a high-energy mechanism, syndesmotic concern or a Maisonneuve-type pattern is possible
- Foot radiographs if there is midfoot, base of fifth metatarsal or talar tenderness
- CT for a suspected Tillaux, triplane or SH-III/IV fracture, intra-articular displacement, unclear fracture geometry or pre-operative planning
MRI is not routine for clear fractures, but may help when radiographs are negative and symptoms remain disproportionate, or when occult physeal injury is a concern.
The Tillaux on film and on CT. The plain-film clue is a subtle vertical lucency in the anterolateral epiphysis. CT is needed when the fracture line or displacement is uncertain; measure displacement in orthogonal planes and map the fragment before choosing casting or fixation.


Assess the mortise, the physis, the articular surface and each named fragment in turn.
- How To Assess
- Check medial clear space, talar shift and joint line.
- Treatment Meaning
- Incongruity suggests unstable or intra-articular injury.
- How To Assess
- Measure residual gap, translation and angulation after reduction.
- Treatment Meaning
- Persistent gap may indicate periosteal/tissue interposition.
- How To Assess
- Measure on CT in coronal, sagittal and axial planes.
- Treatment Meaning
- Greater than 2 mm is the common threshold for anatomical reduction.
- How To Assess
- Look for anterolateral epiphyseal fragment attached to AITFL.
- Treatment Meaning
- Screw trajectory is usually planned perpendicular to the fracture line while avoiding the physis when possible.
- How To Assess
- Define epiphyseal, physeal and metaphyseal components on CT.
- Treatment Meaning
- Determines whether closed/percutaneous fixation is enough or open reduction is needed.
- How To Assess
- Assess SH-III/IV line and residual displacement.
- Treatment Meaning
- High physeal-bar risk; reduction quality and follow-up matter.
Periosteal interposition. Suspect it when a displaced SH-II fracture retains a physeal gap after a careful reduction attempt.

Where the 2 mm figure comes from. The threshold is not arbitrary, but it is narrower than its everyday use suggests. It derives from Ertl 1988 (23 triplane fractures, Level IV), which found that residual displacement of 2 mm or more after reduction was associated with a less than optimum result, "unless the epiphyseal fracture was outside the primary weight-bearing area of the ankle".
The rule was always about where the step is as well as how big it is, so state the location with the measurement. A 3 mm step in the anterolateral corner outside the loaded zone is a different problem from a 2 mm step in the plafond.
Two caveats that pull in opposite directions. A later CT-based series (Choudhry, 78 transitional fractures) found no functional penalty up to 2.4 mm at a minimum of two years. Ertl's results, on the other hand, got worse with time: 20 of 23 patients were asymptomatic at 18-36 months, but only 8 of 15 remained asymptomatic when reviewed at 38 months to 13 years.
Short follow-up flatters these injuries, and a good two-year result is not proof of a good outcome at twenty. Treat 2 mm as a deliberately conservative working threshold in the weight-bearing plafond, and do not let a reassuring early review close the case.
The medial malleolus exception. Here the 2 mm test is the wrong instrument. In a series where every patient was reduced to within 2 mm, mean residual displacement was 1.2 mm in those who went on to form a bar and 0.8 mm in those who did not (P = 0.03). At this fracture the useful question is how close to zero the reduction is, so aim for anatomical rather than merely acceptable.
Management
First steps. Control pain, elevate and splint, which reduces swelling and allows safe reassessment. Skin tenting or severe deformity needs urgent reduction and an open injury needs urgent theatre, to prevent skin compromise and contamination complications.
Around every reduction. Document pulses, capillary refill and sensation before and after reduction, which identifies injury-related or iatrogenic deterioration. Repeat AP, mortise and lateral films after any reduction to confirm alignment and residual displacement.
The decision turns on displacement and stability, pattern by pattern.
- Treatment
- Below-knee cast or boot depending local practice and pain.
- Follow-Up
- Clinical review; avoid overcalling sprain if physeal tenderness is present.
- Treatment
- Cast after acceptable alignment.
- Follow-Up
- Repeat radiographs to ensure alignment is maintained.
- Treatment
- Cast or close follow-up when CT confirms congruity.
- Follow-Up
- Monitor for displacement and symptoms.
- Treatment
- Counsel about growth arrest even if treated non-operatively.
- Follow-Up
- Longer radiographic surveillance.
Implants. Implant choice does not replace the essential endpoints: restored alignment, stable fixation and a protected articular surface and physis. In SH-IV fractures the construct must follow the CT-defined fracture geometry while restoring the joint surface and limiting additional physeal injury.


Operative Technique
Principles. The operation should reduce the joint surface, respect the physis, avoid repeated traumatic manipulation and provide enough stability for safe healing. In Tillaux and triplane injuries CT determines the approach and the screw trajectory.
- Sequence
- Position supine; analgesia/anaesthesia; traction and reverse mechanism; check AP/mortise/lateral; cast; repeat films.
- Pitfalls
- Repeated forceful attempts can injure the physis or soft tissues.
- Sequence
- Supine; image intensifier AP/mortise/lateral; reduce closed; insert cannulated screw or K-wire according to fragment; confirm joint and physis.
- Pitfalls
- Do not accept a poor reduction just because fixation is percutaneous.
- Sequence
- Anterolateral approach if closed reduction fails; identify fragment; clear interposed tissue; reduce anterolateral epiphysis; fix with epiphyseal screw parallel to joint/physis where possible.
- Pitfalls
- Screw trajectory must not enter the joint; CT planning is essential.
- Sequence
- CT plan; reduce epiphyseal joint component first; fix epiphyseal fragment; then reduce/fix metaphyseal component if needed.
- Pitfalls
- Treating only the metaphyseal fragment can leave the joint incongruent.
- Sequence
- Medial approach; protect saphenous structures; reduce SH-III/IV fragment anatomically; fix with screw trajectory planned to minimise physeal damage.
- Pitfalls
- Residual displacement increases bar risk; follow-up is mandatory.
Positioning for arthroscopy-assisted reduction. The patient lies supine and fully draped, with the ankle accessible to imaging and instrumentation. The set-up must preserve fluoroscopic AP, mortise and lateral views and permit conversion to an open approach if the reduction remains unacceptable.

Checking the reduction. Confirm the clamp path and the reduction in orthogonal views, then verify articular congruity before definitive fixation. Check wire trajectory, stability and proximity to the physis in both planes.


For Tillaux and triplane injuries, the operative endpoint is not just a screw in bone. The endpoint is a congruent mortise, less than 2 mm residual articular displacement, stable fixation and a documented plan for growth follow-up.
Complications and Failure Management
What union cannot exclude. Early fracture union cannot exclude growth arrest: a partial physeal arrest may only show itself as asymmetric growth and progressive angular change.

- Risk Pattern
- Medial malleolus SH-III/IV, high-energy distal tibial physis, residual displacement.
- Management
- Serial radiographs; consider bar resection, guided growth, epiphysiodesis or osteotomy depending bar size and growth remaining.
- Risk Pattern
- Partial distal tibial arrest.
- Management
- Measure mechanical/anatomic axis and ankle orientation; guided growth or osteotomy if progressive/significant.
- Risk Pattern
- Complete or partial arrest with meaningful remaining growth.
- Management
- Scanogram, bone age and prediction; shoe raise, epiphysiodesis or length correction depending magnitude.
- Risk Pattern
- Residual intra-articular incongruity after SH-III/IV, Tillaux or triplane fracture.
- Management
- Prevention is anatomical reduction; established arthritis is managed symptomatically or reconstructively.
- Risk Pattern
- Prolonged immobilisation or intra-articular injury.
- Management
- Motion after healing, physiotherapy and gradual return to activity.
- Risk Pattern
- High-energy injury, severe swelling, displaced distal tibial injury.
- Management
- Emergency recognition and fasciotomy if diagnosed.
Detecting and Treating a Physeal Bar
Harris lines. Harris (Park) lines are transverse radiodense lines in the metaphysis that form when growth slows and then resumes, after injury, illness or chemotherapy. They are a useful early sign of how the physis is behaving.
A line parallel and symmetric to the physis indicates uniform resumed growth and is reassuring. A line that is asymmetric and converges towards, or is tethered to, the physis points to a focal area that has stopped growing, an early physeal bar. Looking at the orientation of the Harris line on surveillance films can flag a developing bar before frank deformity appears.
Treatment of an established bar is driven by bar size, as a percentage of the physeal cross-sectional area, and the growth remaining. Map bar size and location with CT or MRI before deciding.
A small bar (broadly less than ~50% of the physis) in a child with significant growth left (commonly quoted as at least ~2 years or ~2 cm of remaining growth) can be excised, a Langenskiold-type resection, with interposition of a material that prevents reformation (autologous fat, cranioplast/PMMA or silastic), to allow the remaining physis to resume growth.
A large bar (greater than ~50%), or one with little growth remaining, is better managed by completion of the epiphysiodesis of that physis to prevent progressive angular deformity, combined as needed with contralateral epiphysiodesis, corrective osteotomy and/or limb-length equalisation.
Post-Operative Care and Rehabilitation
- Typical Plan
- Non-weight bearing initially, then progress according to pain, healing and local protocol.
- What To Monitor
- Loss of reduction, pain, swelling and late growth disturbance.
- Typical Plan
- Protected non-weight bearing, wound/pin review if relevant, radiographs.
- What To Monitor
- Reduction maintenance, hardware symptoms and healing.
- Typical Plan
- Below-knee immobilisation, non-weight bearing until early healing, then progressive motion.
- What To Monitor
- Joint congruity, screw position, infection, stiffness and physeal bar.
- Typical Plan
- Serial standing alignment and ankle radiographs.
- What To Monitor
- Physeal bar, angular deformity and leg-length difference.
Beyond union. Children with intra-articular displacement, high-energy trauma, a medial malleolus injury or meaningful remaining growth should not disappear after fracture union. They need a surveillance plan until the risk of growth arrest is acceptably low.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global epidemiology
Paediatric ankle fractures account for about 5% of all paediatric fractures, and distal tibial physeal injuries make up roughly 15-20% of all physeal injuries, making the distal tibia the most commonly injured lower-limb physis in children. Transitional fractures (Tillaux and triplane) cluster in the roughly 18-month window before physeal closure, which completes at about 14 years in girls and 16 years in boys. Boys are affected more often overall; girls sustain transitional fractures at a younger age than boys.
Side-by-side guidance
There is no single global ankle-specific paediatric guideline; practice is built from major-society principles plus the paediatric trauma literature. The points below describe how the relevant bodies frame the same problem.
- Emphasis
- Mechanism, Salter-Harris pattern and physis-sparing fixation.
- Practical Position
- Anatomical reduction of intra-articular fragments; implants chosen to minimise physeal injury; CT for transitional patterns.
- Emphasis
- Classification-driven management and growth-arrest risk.
- Practical Position
- Low threshold for CT in intra-articular and transitional fractures; surveillance for premature physeal closure.
- Emphasis
- Timely senior-led care, neurovascular documentation and open-fracture pathways.
- Practical Position
- Soft-tissue and neurovascular assessment first; defined escalation for open or deformed injuries.
- Emphasis
- Standardised physeal-injury assessment and follow-up.
- Practical Position
- Reduce the joint, protect the physis and follow to skeletal maturity in high-risk patterns.
Registries
Unlike arthroplasty, paediatric ankle fractures are not tracked by implant registries; the evidence base is observational cohorts and systematic reviews (for example the 2025 triplane review pooling 34 studies). National paediatric trauma networks and major-trauma audits, rather than implant registries, are the closest surveillance structures.
High-resource versus limited-resource practice
- Well-resourced setting
- CT routine for transitional and SH-III/IV fractures; MRI available for occult injury.
- Limited-resource setting
- Reliance on good-quality mortise and lateral radiographs; intra-operative arthrogram or image intensifier to judge congruity.
- Well-resourced setting
- Cannulated screws and image intensifier readily available.
- Limited-resource setting
- K-wires and careful closed reduction where screws are scarce; sound reduction still prioritised.
- Well-resourced setting
- Structured growth-arrest surveillance to maturity.
- Limited-resource setting
- Surveillance limited by access; clear safety-netting and return advice become essential.
Controversies and Areas of Uncertainty
Examiners reward a candidate who can hold a clear default position while acknowledging genuine debate. The honest answer to most of these is anatomical reduction of the displaced joint, with the nuance below.
- What Is Agreed
- Greater than 2 mm displacement on CT is the practical threshold for anatomical reduction.
- What Remains Uncertain
- Outcomes data (Choudhry/Crawford) suggest displacement under about 2.5 mm after sound reduction is tolerated; the safe upper limit is not defined.
- What Is Agreed
- The articular surface must be congruent however it is achieved.
- What Remains Uncertain
- Closed reduction with percutaneous screws gives good results when reduction is perfect, but the threshold to convert to open is judgement-based.
- What Is Agreed
- CT is standard for SH-III/IV, Tillaux and triplane planning.
- What Remains Uncertain
- Radiation stewardship versus information gain in clearly undisplaced patterns; some centres use limited-sequence MRI.
- What Is Agreed
- Avoid crossing the physis where the geometry allows.
- What Remains Uncertain
- In transitional fractures the physis is closing, so a transphyseal screw is often acceptable; in young children it is avoided.
- What Is Agreed
- Medial malleolus SH-III/IV and high-energy distal tibial injuries need prolonged surveillance.
- What Remains Uncertain
- Optimal frequency and total duration vary; at least 12 months is supported for medial malleolus injuries, longer with substantial growth remaining.
Clinical Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 14-year-old has lateral ankle pain after an external rotation injury. X-rays suggest a Tillaux fracture. CT shows 1.5 mm articular gap.”
“A 13-year-old has a triplane ankle fracture. CT shows a displaced epiphyseal component with 4 mm joint step and a metaphyseal fragment.”
“A 10-year-old has a displaced medial malleolus SH-III fracture. It is reduced and fixed. At five months the radiograph shows asymmetric physeal closure.”
Assess
- Check skin, swelling, pulses, sensation and compartment risk.
- Order AP, mortise and true lateral ankle radiographs.
- Add tibia/fibula views for proximal pain or syndesmotic concern.
Image
- Use CT for Tillaux, triplane, SH-III/IV or unclear intra-articular displacement.
- Measure articular step and gap on CT.
- Look specifically at the medial malleolus and distal tibial physis.
Treat
- Stable extra-articular injuries can usually be casted.
- Displaced physeal injuries need gentle reduction; fixation if unstable or blocked.
- Intra-articular/transitional injuries greater than 2 mm usually need anatomical reduction.
Follow
- Monitor high-risk injuries for growth arrest.
- Medial malleolus SH-III/IV injuries need prolonged surveillance.
- Treat physeal bar according to bar size, deformity and remaining growth.
Evidence Signals
Guidelines to management
- Paediatric ankle fractures represent about 5% of all paediatric fractures.
- Distal tibial physeal injuries account for approximately 15-20% of all physeal injuries.
- CT is recommended with low threshold for suspected intra-articular or transitional fractures.
- Intra-articular displacement greater than 2 mm needs anatomical reduction and stabilisation.
Physeal ankle fracture review
- Distal tibial physeal fractures require attention to growth arrest risk.
- Classification, displacement and remaining growth guide treatment.
- Anatomic reduction is central for intra-articular patterns.
Dias-Tachdjian classification (landmark)
- Analysed 71 paediatric ankle fractures and proposed a mechanism-based classification by foot position and direction of force.
- Supination-inversion was the commonest mechanism, present in almost half of cases.
- Correlation with the Salter-Harris system is essential because varus deformity is common after SH-III and SH-IV injuries.