FOOSH injuries, torus fractures, physeal patterns and safe immobilisation
- Buckle fractures are stable compression injuries with no complete cortical break.
- Distal radius remodelling is strong, especially in younger children and sagittal-plane deformity.
- Physeal injuries need careful reduction attempts and follow-up for growth disturbance.
- A displaced complete fracture is not a buckle fracture.
- Cast tightness and median nerve symptoms must be actively checked.
- “Point tenderness over distal radius after FOOSH should be imaged.
- “Buckle fractures can often be treated with removable splint and clear advice.
- “Repeated forceful physeal reductions increase growth-plate risk.
- “Document median nerve before and after reduction.
Do not over-treat a true buckle fracture or under-treat a displaced physeal fracture. The difference is cortical stability, deformity, tenderness pattern and radiographic alignment.
Images and Diagrams

- Answer
- Buckle fracture with intact opposite cortex
- Clinical use
- Splint or simple immobilisation with safety advice
- Answer
- Complete metaphyseal fracture, bayonet apposition or displaced physis
- Clinical use
- Reduction and closer follow-up may be needed
- Answer
- Skin, deformity, median nerve and perfusion
- Clinical use
- Detects urgent problems before casting
- Answer
- Distal radial physis contributes major forearm growth
- Clinical use
- Physeal injuries require surveillance
WRISTAssessment
Hook:WRIST keeps the examination safe: skin, cortex, sensation, physis and cast symptoms.
BUCKLEStable Torus Injury
Hook:BUCKLE reinforces why true torus fractures need comfort, advice and confidence rather than fracture over-treatment.
PHYSISGrowth Plate Risk
Hook:PHYSIS keeps growth-plate injuries separate from stable buckle fractures.
Overview/Epidemiology
Paediatric distal radius injuries are among the most common fractures in childhood, usually after a fall on an outstretched hand. They range from a stable compression injury to a displaced fracture involving both cortices or the distal radial physis. The clinical skill is matching the amount of treatment to the true stability of the injury.
A buckle fracture is a compression bulge in the cortex. It is stable because there is no complete cortical disruption. It should not be treated like a displaced fracture. Conversely, a complete metaphyseal fracture or displaced physeal injury should not be softened into the word "buckle" just because the child is young.
Remodelling potential is excellent near the distal radial physis, especially in younger children and sagittal-plane deformity. It is less reliable in adolescents, coronal deformity, rotational deformity, unstable complete fractures and injuries close to skeletal maturity. Distal ulna physeal injury deserves special attention because growth disturbance can create ulnar variance and distal radioulnar joint problems.
The goals are simple: identify the pattern, protect the skin and nerves, avoid unnecessary follow-up for stable buckle fractures, reduce unacceptable deformity gently, use a well-moulded non-tight cast when needed, and give families clear cast and swelling return advice.
Pathophysiology
Most paediatric distal radius fractures occur after axial load through an extended wrist. The injury pattern depends on bone elasticity, cortical failure, periosteal hinge integrity and whether the force exits through the metaphysis or the physis.
- Structural problem
- Compression crumples one cortex but the bone is not broken through.
- What it means clinically
- Inherently stable when correctly diagnosed; treatment is for comfort and confidence.
- Structural problem
- The tension cortex fails and the compression cortex bends.
- What it means clinically
- The intact cortex can preserve partial stability, but angulation can persist unless moulded or reduced.
- Structural problem
- Both cortices fail, often with dorsal angulation, translation or shortening.
- What it means clinically
- This is an unstable fracture pattern compared with a buckle injury; reduction and follow-up depend on age and alignment.
- Structural problem
- The distal radial or ulnar physis fails because the growth plate is weaker than surrounding ligaments.
- What it means clinically
- Reduction should be gentle, and displaced injuries need surveillance for growth disturbance.
Remodelling depends on age, plane of deformity and proximity to the distal radial physis. Younger children have more growth remaining. Sagittal-plane deformity remodels more predictably than coronal deformity, and rotation does not remodel reliably. Shortening or bayonet apposition may be acceptable in selected young children, but it should not be used as a blanket rule for adolescents near skeletal maturity.
Median nerve symptoms can occur from swelling, deformity or a tight cast. Distal ulna physeal injury carries growth-disturbance risk and should not be forgotten when the radius fracture dominates the X-ray.
Classification

- Buckle: stable cortical bulge without complete break.
- Greenstick: one cortex broken and the other bent.
- Complete metaphyseal: both cortices disrupted, may angulate or shorten.
- Physeal: Salter-Harris pattern involving distal radial or ulnar physis.
Clinical Presentation
History
The history should separate a stable low-energy wrist injury from a displaced fracture, associated injury or safeguarding concern.
- Useful details
- Fall on outstretched hand, sport, scooter, trampoline, fall from height, direct blow or crush.
- Why it matters
- Higher-energy mechanisms increase the chance of complete fracture, associated elbow injury, open injury or neurovascular concern.
- Useful details
- Distal radius, distal ulna, snuffbox, whole forearm or elbow.
- Why it matters
- Focal distal radial pain fits buckle or distal radius fracture; snuffbox or elbow pain changes imaging.
- Useful details
- Refusal to use the hand, visible deformity, finger movement and ability to tolerate a splint.
- Why it matters
- Deformity and severe pain make a simple buckle fracture less likely.
- Useful details
- Numbness or paraesthesia in thumb, index or middle fingers.
- Why it matters
- Suggests median nerve irritation from swelling, deformity or tight immobilisation.
- Useful details
- Increasing pain, swollen fingers, colour change, numbness or inability to move fingers.
- Why it matters
- This is a cast safety problem until proven otherwise.
- Useful details
- Recurrent fractures, very low-energy injury, inconsistent history, delay in presentation or non-mobile child.
- Why it matters
- May require metabolic bone or child protection assessment.
Examination
Inspection separates a comfortable stable injury from a deformed unstable fracture. Do not force wrist movement when the diagnosis is clinically obvious.
- What to check
- Bruising, open wound, threatened skin, cast pressure, finger swelling and colour.
- Decision it informs
- Open or threatened-skin injuries need urgent escalation; tight casts must be split or removed.
- What to check
- Dorsal or volar angulation, translation, shortening and forearm shape.
- Decision it informs
- Visible deformity usually means complete or physeal fracture, not a simple buckle injury.
- What to check
- Distal radius, distal ulna physis, DRUJ, snuffbox, forearm shaft and elbow.
- Decision it informs
- Guides radiograph field and prevents missed ulna, scaphoid, Galeazzi-equivalent or elbow injury.
- What to check
- Thumb, index and middle-finger sensation; thumb opposition or flexion when age-appropriate.
- Decision it informs
- Document before and after reduction because swelling or deformity can compromise the nerve.
- What to check
- Radial pulse, capillary refill, warmth and finger movement.
- Decision it informs
- Confirms vascular safety and helps detect evolving compartment or cast problems.
- What to check
- Pain out of proportion, pain with passive finger stretch, increasing analgesia need and tense swelling.
- Decision it informs
- Requires urgent review; do not dismiss it as expected fracture pain.
The clinical and radiographic question is stability: a buckle fracture is a compression bulge, not a complete fracture wearing a nicer name.
Investigations

- Investigation
- AP and lateral wrist radiographs including distal radius and ulna
- Decision it informs
- Classifies buckle, metaphyseal or physeal injury
- Investigation
- Forearm or elbow radiographs as indicated
- Decision it informs
- Detects associated injury
- Investigation
- Repeat AP and lateral films
- Decision it informs
- Confirms alignment and cast quality
- Investigation
- Scaphoid views or MRI in selected adolescents
- Decision it informs
- Avoids missed carpal injury
- Look at both cortices before calling a buckle fracture.
- Assess dorsal or volar tilt, translation, shortening and associated ulna fracture.
- Do not miss distal ulna physeal injury.
- In adolescents, consider carpal injury if pain is not explained by distal radius findings.
- Repeat imaging depends on stability, age, reduction and local fracture protocol.
Differential Diagnosis
- Clue
- Diffuse pain without focal bony tenderness or radiographic abnormality.
- Clinical consequence
- Use cautiously; focal distal radial tenderness in a child is a fracture until assessed properly.
- Clue
- Snuffbox tenderness, pain with axial thumb loading, adolescent age group.
- Clinical consequence
- May need scaphoid views, immobilisation and interval imaging or MRI.
- Clue
- Ulnar-sided physeal tenderness or associated distal ulna fracture.
- Clinical consequence
- Carries growth-arrest and ulnar-variance risk; do not focus only on the radius.
- Clue
- Distal radial fracture with DRUJ pain, distal ulna physeal injury or ulnar head prominence.
- Clinical consequence
- Requires DRUJ and ulna assessment, not just routine distal radius management.
- Clue
- Inconsistent history, delay, non-mobile child or additional injuries.
- Clinical consequence
- Escalate safeguarding assessment.
- Clue
- Very low-energy mechanism, recurrent fractures or abnormal bone lesion.
- Clinical consequence
- Consider metabolic bone disease or benign bone lesion work-up.
Management

The first management decision is whether the injury is truly stable. A true buckle fracture can be managed simply because it is a stable compression injury. A displaced complete or physeal fracture needs alignment assessment, reduction decision, cast quality and follow-up.
Cast Quality and Redisplacement (Cast Index)
After reduction of a displaced fracture, the quality of the cast mould is the surgeon-controlled factor that most predicts redisplacement. A good cast is three-point moulded and elliptical (flattened) rather than round in cross-section.
- Cast index = the internal sagittal (lateral) cast width ÷ internal coronal (AP) cast width measured at the fracture level. A well-moulded cast is elliptical with a cast index around 0.7; a cast index > 0.8 (a round, poorly-moulded cast) is strongly associated with loss of reduction.
- Related described measures include the three-point index, gap index, padding index and Canterbury index — all quantify moulding/contact and predict redisplacement.
- Practical implication: if the post-reduction cast index is > 0.8 or the mould is poor, anticipate redisplacement — re-mould (e.g. wedge) or review early, and have a low threshold for fixation in the older child.
- Usual treatment direction
- Removable splint, soft bandage or simple immobilisation according to local protocol; analgesia and written advice.
- Follow-up focus
- Return if pain worsens, fingers swell or function does not recover as expected; routine repeat X-rays are often unnecessary when diagnosis is secure.
- Usual treatment direction
- Short-arm cast or splint/cast strategy depending stability, age, pain and local protocol.
- Follow-up focus
- Confirm that alignment remains acceptable if there is displacement risk.
- Usual treatment direction
- Analgesia or sedation, closed reduction when alignment is unacceptable, well-moulded cast and post-reduction films.
- Follow-up focus
- Early review for redisplacement, especially with poor cast moulding, both-bone injury or older child.
- Usual treatment direction
- Gentle reduction if unacceptable; avoid repeated forceful attempts; immobilise and document neurovascular status.
- Follow-up focus
- Monitor reduction and later growth, particularly after high-energy injury or repeated manipulation.
- Usual treatment direction
- Assess DRUJ stability and ulnar physis; treat associated instability rather than ignoring it.
- Follow-up focus
- Watch for ulnar variance, wrist pain and forearm rotation problems.
- Usual treatment direction
- Urgent orthopaedic management, cast release when tight, antibiotics and theatre when open.
- Follow-up focus
- Safety takes priority over routine fracture pathway.
- Explain that this is a stable compression injury.
- Use removable wrist splint or simple immobilisation according to local protocol.
- Encourage finger, elbow and shoulder movement.
- Avoid contact sport until pain-free and advised timeframe completed.
- Give return advice rather than routine intensive fracture surveillance when truly stable.
Complications
Early
- Median nerve symptoms.
- Cast tightness, swelling or pressure injury.
- Loss of reduction.
- Compartment syndrome, rare but serious.
- Missed associated elbow or carpal injury.
Managing acute median-nerve dysfunction / acute carpal tunnel syndrome: a displaced distal radius fracture can injure the median nerve by stretch, contusion or compression. The first step is prompt fracture reduction, which relieves most stretch/compression neurapraxia — then re-examine the nerve. Distinguish two situations: (1) a neurapraxia that is stable or improving after reduction → observe with serial examination; (2) a deficit that is progressive, or persists/worsens after an adequate reduction (acute carpal tunnel syndrome) → this is a surgical emergency requiring urgent carpal tunnel release/decompression. Also avoid over-flexed ("Cotton-Loder") casting, which raises carpal tunnel pressure and can precipitate median neuropathy.
Late
- Malunion with residual deformity.
- Distal radial or ulnar physeal arrest.
- Wrist stiffness from over-immobilisation.
- Refracture after early return to sport.
- Cosmetic deformity or functional limitation if alignment unacceptable.
The common error is mismatch: too much treatment for a buckle fracture or too little respect for an unstable physeal or complete fracture.
Decision-Making in Practice
Paediatric distal radius injuries should be separated into stable buckle fractures, greenstick or complete metaphyseal fractures, and physeal injuries. These are different problems. A buckle fracture is a stability and comfort problem; a displaced physeal injury is a reduction, growth and follow-up problem.
- Key assessment
- Cortical buckling without cortical breach, no physeal extension, stable alignment
- Treatment direction
- Removable splint or soft bandage with simple safety-netting is often enough
- Key assessment
- Angulation, translation, age and remodeling potential
- Treatment direction
- Cast, moulded reduction or fixation depending stability
- Key assessment
- Salter-Harris pattern, displacement, reduction quality and growth remaining
- Treatment direction
- Gentle reduction, immobilisation and growth follow-up when displaced
- Key assessment
- Associated ulnar physeal damage or DRUJ symptoms
- Treatment direction
- Higher vigilance for growth arrest and ulnar variance problems
- Key assessment
- Non-mobile child, inconsistent history or additional injuries
- Treatment direction
- Escalate child protection assessment before routine discharge
The practical error is over-treating stable buckle fractures while under-recognising physeal injuries. True torus fractures should not need repeated X-rays, prolonged casting or fracture-clinic congestion when diagnosis is secure and the family has clear return advice. Conversely, a displaced physeal injury needs reduction quality, neurovascular status, cast mould, re-displacement risk and later growth assessment considered.
Return to sport depends on pain-free wrist motion, tenderness resolution and injury pattern. A buckle fracture returns earlier than a displaced physeal fracture or complete metaphyseal fracture.
Clinical Reasoning Notes
- Question
- Is it truly a buckle fracture?
- Safe answer
- Check both cortices and the physis. A complete fracture or displaced physis should not be discharged as a buckle injury.
- Question
- Is the child neurovascularly safe?
- Safe answer
- Document median nerve and perfusion before and after reduction or cast application.
- Question
- Is the alignment acceptable for this child?
- Safe answer
- Younger children remodel more; adolescents and rotational deformity are less forgiving.
- Question
- Can the fracture redisplace?
- Safe answer
- Complete fractures, associated ulna fractures and poor cast moulding need closer follow-up than stable buckle fractures.
- Question
- Is there a growth-plate issue?
- Safe answer
- Name distal radial and distal ulnar physeal injuries explicitly and arrange surveillance when risk is meaningful.
- Question
- Does the family know when to return?
- Safe answer
- Increasing pain, swollen fingers, numbness, colour change or inability to move fingers is urgent.
Common pitfalls
- Why it is unsafe
- The child may be discharged without reduction or redisplacement follow-up.
- Better practice
- Confirm no complete cortical breach and no physeal extension.
- Why it is unsafe
- Growth arrest can later cause ulnar variance and DRUJ symptoms.
- Better practice
- Examine and report distal ulna tenderness and radiographic injury.
- Why it is unsafe
- Median nerve deterioration may be missed.
- Better practice
- Document sensation, motor function and perfusion before and after manipulation.
- Why it is unsafe
- Can worsen pain, nerve symptoms or compartment risk.
- Better practice
- Use appropriate padding, moulding and cast splitting when swelling risk is high.
- Why it is unsafe
- May increase iatrogenic growth-plate injury.
- Better practice
- Use adequate analgesia/sedation, gentle technique and senior help if reduction fails.
- Why it is unsafe
- Families may wait despite cast pain, numbness or swollen fingers.
- Better practice
- Give clear written and verbal return precautions.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Paediatric distal radius fractures are a worldwide problem and the single most common skeletal injury requiring intervention in children. Practice varies more by health-system resource and local protocol than by true biological difference, so the global picture matters for any exam answer.
Global epidemiology
- Distal forearm fractures account for roughly a quarter to a third of all childhood fractures, with peak incidence around the pubertal growth spurt.
- Boys are affected more often than girls overall, mirroring activity exposure; in the FORCE cohort 61 percent were boys.
- Rising incidence has been linked to increased sport participation, higher body mass index and reduced bone mineral density in some populations.
- Distal ulnar physeal injuries show growth disturbance in around one in five cases, and intra-articular (Salter-Harris III/IV) distal radius fractures in around two in five.
Side-by-side guidance
- Torus (buckle) fractures
- Supports minimal immobilisation and discharge with safety-netting; reflects FORCE findings.
- Displaced and physeal fractures
- Timely reduction of unacceptable alignment, neurovascular documentation and structured follow-up.
- Torus (buckle) fractures
- Removable splint or simplified care for stable torus fractures.
- Displaced and physeal fractures
- Closed reduction for unacceptable alignment; pinning for unstable or recurrently displaced fractures; physis guides decisions.
- Torus (buckle) fractures
- Recognises torus as stable; protective immobilisation for comfort.
- Displaced and physeal fractures
- Reduction and well-moulded casting; emphasises cast index and Kirschner-wire fixation when unstable.
- Torus (buckle) fractures
- Aligns with minimal-immobilisation evidence for true torus injuries.
- Displaced and physeal fractures
- Accept remodelling in younger children; reserve fixation for instability or maturity.
Registry and trial evidence
- Paediatric fracture care is driven by trial evidence rather than implant registries (registries dominate adult arthroplasty, not childhood fractures).
- The FORCE equivalence RCT (965 children, 23 UK hospitals) is the landmark dataset supporting bandage-and-discharge for torus fractures.
- Cohort data from North American children's hospitals define the growth-arrest risk that justifies physeal surveillance.
High- versus limited-resource practice
- In well-resourced systems the debate is about doing less: removable splints, no routine repeat films and reduced clinic visits for buckle fractures.
- In limited-resource settings the priorities are accurate triage to avoid missing displaced or physeal fractures, safe casting where image-guided fixation is unavailable, and clear caregiver safety-netting because follow-up may be difficult.
- Across all settings the universal non-negotiables are neurovascular assessment, recognition of the physis and a well-moulded, non-tight cast when immobilisation is used.
Controversies and Areas of Uncertainty
Several questions in paediatric distal radius care remain genuinely unresolved, and examiners reward candidates who can state both sides rather than quote a single number.
- One side
- Off-ended (bayonet) complete fractures with good alignment can remodel without formal reduction in younger children.
- Other side
- Some surgeons still reduce to restore length, citing variable remodelling and parental expectation.
- One side
- Traditional teaching cites roughly 15 to 20 degrees sagittal in younger children, more with more growth remaining.
- Other side
- Remodelling studies show even higher angulation can correct, so thresholds are guides, not hard rules.
- One side
- Completing or moulding the fracture may reduce redisplacement.
- Other side
- Gentle moulding without completing the fracture avoids extra injury and is often sufficient.
- One side
- Percutaneous wiring reduces redisplacement and remanipulation.
- Other side
- Long-term functional benefit is unproven and pinning adds anaesthetic, scar and hardware risks.
- One side
- Some protocols still image at review.
- Other side
- High-level evidence supports discharge without routine repeat imaging when the diagnosis is secure.
- One side
- Imaging confirms the pattern and excludes physeal or complete fracture.
- Other side
- A validated clinical decision rule to avoid radiography in minor injuries is an explicit research priority from the FORCE programme.
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A seven-year-old has a distal radius buckle fracture after FOOSH. How do you manage it?”
“A child has a displaced distal radial Salter-Harris II fracture. What are your priorities?”
“A 13-year-old has a completely displaced, dorsally angulated complete metaphyseal distal radius fracture with bayonet apposition. The wrist is swollen and the child reports tingling in the thumb. How do you proceed?”
Buckle
- Compression bulge
- Stable
- No complete cortex break
- Splint
- Return advice
Displaced
- Deformity
- Both cortices or physis
- Reduction if unacceptable
- Moulded cast
- Repeat X-ray
Check
- Skin
- Median nerve
- Perfusion
- Finger movement
- Cast tightness
Do Not Miss
- Distal ulna physis
- Scaphoid in adolescent
- Galeazzi equivalent
- Compartment signs
Evidence Signals
FORCE trial: bandage equivalent to rigid immobilisation for torus fractures
- Multicentre equivalence RCT of 965 children aged 4 to 15 across 23 UK hospitals.
- Pain at 3 days was equivalent: 3.21 vs 3.14 points, adjusted difference -0.10 (95% CI -0.37 to 0.17), within the prespecified margin of 1.0.
- No between-group difference in pain or function across 6 weeks of follow-up.
FORCE HTA: bandage is also cost-effective and complication-equivalent
- Complications were rare and equivalent: 5 (1.0%) with bandage versus 3 (0.6%) with rigid immobilisation.
- No difference in functional recovery, quality of life or school absence over 6 weeks.
- The offer of a bandage reduced treatment cost and was highly likely to be cost-effective.
Plint RCT: removable splint improves function over casting for buckle fractures
- RCT of 113 children aged 6 to 15 with distal radius and/or ulna buckle fractures (87 analysed).
- Removable splint gave better physical functioning (ASKp score) at day 14 and less difficulty with bathing, with no difference in pain.
- There were no refractures in either group.
Cochrane review: evidence supports removable splintage for buckle fractures
- Ten trials involving 827 children; four compared removable splintage versus below-elbow cast for buckle fractures.
- No short-term deformity in any buckle-fracture trial and no refracture at 6 months in the reporting trial.
- Below-elbow casts did not increase redisplacement versus above-elbow casts; percutaneous wiring reduced redisplacement of displaced fractures.
Current concepts: physis guides treatment of all distal radius fractures
- Distal radius fractures are the most common skeletal injury requiring intervention in children.
- Proximity to the physis and remaining skeletal growth guide treatment for all patterns, not just physeal fractures.
- Even among experts there is little consensus on optimal treatment of displaced metaphyseal fractures.
Distal ulna physeal fractures: ~20% growth disturbance
- Fifty-six children with distal ulnar physeal fracture; growth disturbance in 11 (19.6%), with complete arrest in 8 (14.3%).
- Displaced and Salter-Harris III/IV fractures had higher arrest rates (34.8% vs 3.2%; 50% vs 11.1%).
- Less than 2 years of growth remaining markedly raised arrest risk (46.2% vs 9.5%).
Intra-articular distal radius fractures carry high growth-arrest risk
- Twenty-eight skeletally immature patients with Salter-Harris III/IV distal radius fractures.
- Growth disturbance occurred in 12 (43%), substantially higher than rates after extra-articular physeal fractures.
- All four children aged 10 or younger developed arrest requiring skeletal rebalancing procedures.
Evidence Base
Remodelling continues even above the 15 degree threshold
- Forty distal radius malunions in 33 children (aged 3 to 14) healed at 15 degrees angulation or more.
- All fractures remodelled; mean dorsovolar malunion fell from 23 to 8 degrees and radioulnar from 21 to 10 degrees.
- Remodelling speed (mean 2.5 degrees per month) decreased exponentially over time and rose with greater initial angulation.
Distal radius-ulna fractures: review of principles and complications
- Management must include neurovascular assessment, soft-tissue evaluation and explicit attention to the radial and ulnar physes.
- Treatment ranges from casting with radiographic follow-up to urgent reduction and surgical fixation.
- Both early (median nerve, compartment) and late (growth arrest) complications can affect outcomes.
Late manipulation of physeal fractures risks iatrogenic arrest
- Nonsurgical management is most common because of marked remodelling potential.
- Physeal fractures presenting more than 10 days after injury should not be manipulated because of increased physeal-arrest risk.
- Substantial angulation or displacement warrants closed reduction with or without percutaneous pinning.