Volar Angulated Distal Radius | Flexion Mechanism | Volar Plating Standard
- Volar angulation distinguishes Smith from Colles (dorsal angulation)
- Flexed wrist FOOSH or direct blow to dorsal wrist = typical mechanism
- Volar plate fixation is treatment of choice - provides buttress against volar displacement
- Thomas Type II is essentially a volar Barton fracture - highly unstable, needs surgery
- Flexor tendon irritation is main complication - assess at follow-up
- “Smith = volar angulation, Colles = dorsal angulation (garden spade vs dinner fork)
- “All displaced Smith fractures require surgical fixation - casting fails
- “FCR approach protects median nerve and allows direct fracture visualization
- “Volar plate acts as buttress preventing re-displacement
CRITICAL DIFFERENTIATION: Smith = volar angulation (apex dorsal), Colles = dorsal angulation (apex volar). Smith is the "reverse Colles." Think: Smith = Sunrise (apex points up/dorsal).
Smith fractures are inherently unstable due to volar carpal shift. The strong volar ligaments pull the distal fragment volarly. Casting alone has high failure rate - most require volar plate fixation.
Type I: Extra-articular transverse. Type II: Intra-articular (volar Barton variant). Type III: Extra-articular oblique. Type II is most unstable and always requires surgery.
FCR approach is standard for volar plating. The plate provides a buttress effect against the volar displacing forces. Distal locking screws capture dorsal cortex for stability.

- Stability
- Relatively stable
- Management
- Consider casting if aligned
- Key Consideration
- Very rare - most are displaced
- Stability
- Unstable
- Management
- Volar plate ORIF
- Key Consideration
- Standard surgical indication
- Stability
- Highly unstable
- Management
- Volar plate ORIF mandatory
- Key Consideration
- Intra-articular requires anatomic reduction
- Stability
- Moderately unstable
- Management
- Volar plate ORIF
- Key Consideration
- Obliquity makes casting unreliable
- Stability
- Complex instability
- Management
- Address both components
- Key Consideration
- Assess scapholunate, DRUJ
SMITHSMITH - Key Features
Hook:SMITH reminds you of the Sunrise apex and that volar plating is the fix
VOLARVOLAR - Why Volar Plate Works
Hook:VOLAR plating provides the buttress that neutralizes the volar displacing force
FCRFCR Approach Steps
Hook:FCR approach protects median nerve - retract FCR ulnarly to stay safe
IIThomas Types I-II-III
Hook:Type II is the worst - Intra-articular means Inherently unstable
Overview and Epidemiology
Smith's fracture is a distal radius fracture with volar angulation of the distal fragment (apex dorsal). It was first described by Irish surgeon Robert William Smith in 1847, 33 years after Abraham Colles described the dorsally angulated variant.
- Also known as "reverse Colles fracture"
- The eponym specifically refers to the volar angulation pattern
- Distinguished from volar Barton (which is a rim fracture with subluxation)
- Accounts for approximately 5% of all distal radius fractures
- Less common than Colles fractures (approximately 1:10 ratio)
- Bimodal distribution: young adults (high-energy trauma) and elderly (low-energy falls)
- Male predominance in younger patients (sports, motorcycle accidents)
- Equal gender distribution in elderly
- Fall on outstretched hand with wrist flexed (most common)
- Direct blow to dorsum of hand forcing wrist into flexion
- High-energy: motorcycle accidents, sports injuries
- Low-energy: falls in elderly with osteoporotic bone
Robert William Smith was Professor of Surgery at Trinity College Dublin. His 1847 treatise "A Treatise on Fractures in the Vicinity of Joints and on Certain Forms of Accidental and Congenital Dislocations" described this fracture pattern as distinct from the Colles fracture.
Anatomy and Pathophysiology
Distal radius anatomy relevant to Smith fractures:
The distal radius has several key features:
- Volar tilt: Normal volar tilt is 10-15 degrees (palmar inclination)
- Radial inclination: Normal is 22-23 degrees
- Radial height: Normal is 11-12mm
- Ulnar variance: Usually neutral to slightly negative
Ligamentous attachments:
- Volar radiocarpal ligaments (radioscaphocapitate, long radiolunate, short radiolunate) are strong
- These ligaments remain attached to the distal fragment
- They pull the fragment volarly, creating the characteristic deformity
- This explains why Smith fractures are inherently unstable
Pathomechanics of Smith fracture:
The strong volar radiocarpal ligaments remain attached to the distal fragment. When the fracture occurs, these ligaments pull the fragment volarly. Unlike Colles fractures where dorsal comminution allows settling, Smith fractures have intact volar cortex that creates a fulcrum for volar angulation.
- Fall with flexed wrist applies bending moment
- Volar cortex fails in tension (transverse fracture)
- Or direct blow creates shear force (oblique fracture)
- Volar ligaments pull distal fragment volarly
- Pronator quadratus may contribute to deforming force
- Critical landmark on volar distal radius
- Marks transition from flat metaphyseal surface to curved articular surface
- Volar plate should NOT extend beyond this line (causes flexor tendon irritation)
Classification Systems
Thomas Classification (1957) - Standard for Smith fractures
- Description
- Extra-articular transverse
- Characteristics
- Simple transverse fracture through metaphysis
- Stability
- Moderate
- Description
- Intra-articular
- Characteristics
- Volar lip fracture with carpal subluxation (volar Barton variant)
- Stability
- Highly unstable
- Description
- Extra-articular oblique
- Characteristics
- Oblique fracture line juxta-articular
- Stability
- Unstable
Thomas Type II is essentially a volar Barton fracture - an intra-articular volar lip fracture with volar subluxation of the carpus. This is highly unstable and ALWAYS requires surgical fixation. The intact volar lip fragment acts as a ramp that the carpus slides volarly upon.
In a child the same flexion mechanism produces a volarly displaced distal radius physeal (Salter-Harris II) or metaphyseal fracture rather than the adult eponymous Smith - and the management philosophy is the opposite. Because of the enormous remodelling potential of the distal radial physis (which contributes roughly 75-80% of forearm growth), most are treated by closed reduction and a well-moulded cast, not a plate - sagittal-plane (volar/dorsal) angulation in particular remodels reliably in the young child. The reduction reverses the deformity and the cast holds it. Open reduction or fixation is reserved for an irreducible fracture, an open fracture, neurovascular compromise, or the older adolescent near skeletal maturity where remodelling can no longer be relied upon. Beware the Salter-Harris growth-arrest risk of repeated forceful manipulation, and counsel families that a degree of residual angulation in a young child is acceptable because it will correct with growth.
Clinical Assessment
History:
- Mechanism (FOOSH with flexed wrist, direct blow, high-energy trauma)
- Hand dominance
- Occupation and functional demands
- Previous wrist injuries
- Medical comorbidities (diabetes, osteoporosis)
Physical examination:
- Significance
- Characteristic of Smith pattern
- Assessment
- Compare to contralateral side
- Significance
- Garden spade deformity (opposite of dinner fork)
- Assessment
- Assess degree of displacement
- Significance
- Antalgic posture
- Assessment
- Patient avoids extension
- Significance
- At risk with volar displacement
- Assessment
- Test sensation and motor (APB)
- Significance
- Open fracture assessment
- Assessment
- Document any wounds
- Significance
- Associated injury
- Assessment
- Assess DRUJ stability after fixation
Neurovascular assessment:
- Median nerve: Most at risk due to volar displacement
- Sensation in thumb, index, middle finger
- Motor: abductor pollicis brevis (APB)
- Carpal tunnel symptoms may develop acutely
- Radial artery: Palpate at anatomical snuffbox and wrist
- Capillary refill: Assess all digits
Smith = Garden spade deformity (volar prominence, wrist appears flexed) Colles = Dinner fork deformity (dorsal prominence, wrist appears extended) These eponymous descriptions help distinguish the fractures clinically before imaging.
Associated injuries to assess:
- Scapholunate ligament injury
- TFCC injury
- DRUJ instability
- Carpal fractures (especially scaphoid)
- Ulnar styloid fracture
Differential diagnosis:
The volar-prominence deformity and a distal radius injury on plain films can mimic several patterns. The single most discriminating step is the lateral radiograph (direction of angulation) and whether the fracture is articular.
- Distinguishing feature
- Extra-articular distal radius fracture with volar angulation (apex dorsal), garden spade deformity
- How to confirm / refute
- Lateral radiograph shows volar tilt of distal fragment; no carpal subluxation in Types I/III
- Distinguishing feature
- Intra-articular volar rim fracture with volar carpal subluxation
- How to confirm / refute
- Lateral shows carpus translated volarly with the rim fragment; CT defines articular extent
- Distinguishing feature
- Dorsal angulation (apex volar), dinner fork deformity
- How to confirm / refute
- Lateral shows dorsal tilt - the opposite of Smith
- Distinguishing feature
- Intra-articular dorsal rim fracture with dorsal carpal subluxation
- How to confirm / refute
- Lateral shows dorsal translation of carpus with dorsal rim fragment
- Distinguishing feature
- Oblique radial styloid fracture, often from scaphoid impaction
- How to confirm / refute
- PA view shows styloid fragment; assess scapholunate interval
- Distinguishing feature
- Salter-Harris pattern through the physis, not a true Smith eponym
- How to confirm / refute
- Age and physeal involvement on radiograph
- Distinguishing feature
- Carpal malalignment without a simple metaphyseal radius fracture
- How to confirm / refute
- Lateral shows lost radius-lunate-capitate collinearity; AP shows crowded carpus
- Distinguishing feature
- Forearm fracture with DRUJ disruption rather than isolated distal radius bending
- How to confirm / refute
- Assess full forearm radiograph and DRUJ stability
Investigations
Radiographic assessment:

- PA view: Assess radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance
- Lateral view: Critical for diagnosis - shows volar angulation
- Oblique view: Additional assessment of articular involvement
- Volar angulation of distal fragment (apex dorsal)
- Volar displacement of carpus
- Loss of normal volar tilt (or reversal)
- Possible intra-articular extension (Type II)
- Indicated for intra-articular fractures (Type II)
- Defines articular step-off and gap
- Helps surgical planning for fragment-specific fixation
- Not routine for simple Type I fractures
- Not routine for acute fractures
- Consider if ligamentous injury suspected (persistent pain)
- Assess TFCC, scapholunate ligament
The lateral radiograph is ESSENTIAL for diagnosing Smith fractures. The PA view may look similar to a Colles fracture - only the lateral view demonstrates the characteristic volar angulation that defines a Smith fracture.
Management Algorithm

- Truly non-displaced fractures (rare)
- Acceptable alignment maintained in cast
- Patient factors precluding surgery
- Closed reduction under hematoma block or sedation
- Sugar-tong splint initially (allows swelling)
- Convert to long arm cast at 1 week
- Position: wrist in extension, forearm supinated
- Duration: 6 weeks
Non-operative management of displaced Smith fractures has a high failure rate due to the deforming forces of the volar ligaments. Close follow-up with weekly X-rays for first 2-3 weeks is essential. Any loss of reduction is indication for surgery.
Acceptable alignment (non-operative):
- Volar tilt: neutral or positive (not dorsal)
- Radial inclination: within 5 degrees of normal
- Radial height: within 3mm of normal
- Articular step: less than 2mm
Non-operative management is rarely successful for displaced Smith fractures and most surgeons recommend primary surgical fixation.
Surgical Technique
- Supine on operating table
- Arm table or hand table
- Tourniquet on upper arm (250-280 mmHg)
- Image intensifier from opposite side
- Incision: Longitudinal over FCR tendon, 6-8cm from wrist crease proximally
- Identify FCR: Palpate tendon, incise sheath
- Retract FCR ulnarly: This protects the median nerve (ulnar to FCR)
- Incise floor of FCR sheath: Exposes flexor pollicis longus (FPL)
- Retract FPL radially: Exposes pronator quadratus
- Elevate pronator quadratus: L-shaped incision, elevate from radial border
- Expose fracture: Direct visualization of volar radius
The median nerve lies ULNAR to FCR. By retracting FCR ulnarly, the nerve is protected. This is the key safety principle of the FCR approach. Never dissect ulnar to FCR without identifying the nerve.
The FCR approach provides excellent exposure of the volar distal radius while protecting neurovascular structures.
Complications
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Prevention/Management
- Plate position below watershed line, PQ repair
- Incidence
- Varies with treatment
- Prevention/Management
- Anatomic reduction, stable fixation
- Incidence
- 5-8%
- Prevention/Management
- Protect during approach, avoid excessive retraction
- Incidence
- 10-15%
- Prevention/Management
- Proper plate sizing, consider removal at 1 year
- Incidence
- 5-10%
- Prevention/Management
- Address ulnar styloid base, repair TFCC
- Incidence
- 5%
- Prevention/Management
- Release if acute, monitor if subacute
- Incidence
- 10-20%
- Prevention/Management
- Early mobilization, hand therapy
- Incidence
- 2-5%
- Prevention/Management
- Early recognition, multimodal treatment
Flexor tendon complications:
FPL rupture is the most concerning complication of volar plating. Risk factors include: (1) Plate extending beyond watershed line, (2) Prominent screw heads, (3) Failure to repair pronator quadratus. Patients present with loss of IP joint flexion of thumb. Treatment is tendon reconstruction (FDS ring finger transfer).
- Volar malunion is better tolerated than dorsal (Colles pattern)
- Loss of volar tilt affects wrist mechanics
- Symptomatic malunion may require corrective osteotomy
- Can occur from initial injury (volar displacement)
- Or from surgical approach
- Most are neuropraxic and recover
- Acute carpal tunnel may require release
Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation
- Volar splint in neutral position
- Elevation above heart level
- Active finger ROM immediately
- Ice and analgesia
- Wound check at 48-72 hours
- Remove splint, convert to removable wrist brace
- Begin active wrist ROM (flexion/extension, radial/ulnar deviation)
- Suture removal at 10-14 days
- Hand therapy referral
- Continue finger and elbow ROM
- Progress active wrist ROM
- Begin forearm rotation
- Edema control (compression, elevation)
- Scar massage
- Light functional use
- X-ray at 6 weeks to confirm healing
- Discontinue brace
- Progressive strengthening
- Grip strengthening exercises
- Return to light duties
- Full ROM goal by 8-10 weeks
- Return to full activities
- Sports clearance at 3 months if healed
- Consider hardware removal if symptomatic
- Final outcome assessment
Rehabilitation principles:
- Early ROM prevents stiffness
- Volar plate allows early mobilization
- Strengthening delayed until fracture healed (6 weeks)
- Hand therapy optimizes outcomes
- Patient education on activity restrictions
The advantage of volar locked plating is the ability to begin early ROM within the first week. This reduces stiffness and improves outcomes. Traditional casting required 6 weeks of immobilization.
Outcomes and Prognosis
Outcomes with modern treatment:
Volar locked plating of Smith fractures produces excellent results in most patients. Functional outcomes are comparable to or better than historical non-operative management.
- Favorable: Young age, isolated injury, anatomic reduction
- Unfavorable: Intra-articular involvement, associated carpal injury, elderly with osteoporosis
- Most patients achieve functional ROM (60 degrees flexion/extension, 30 degrees radial/ulnar deviation)
- Grip strength typically recovers to 80-90% of contralateral
- Return to work: 4-8 weeks (desk work), 8-12 weeks (manual labor)
- Return to sport: 3-4 months
- Post-traumatic arthritis in intra-articular fractures (Type II)
- Hardware removal if symptomatic (15-20% rate)
- Overall prognosis excellent with modern fixation techniques
For the older, low-energy half of the bimodal distribution, fixing the wrist is only half the job: a distal radius fracture from a standing-height fall is a sentinel fragility (osteoporotic) fracture and one of the earliest predictors of a future hip or vertebral fracture. Beyond fracture care you must trigger a bone-health pathway - ideally a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) referral - comprising a falls-risk assessment, calcium and vitamin D optimisation, a DEXA / FRAX-based fracture-risk assessment, and antiresorptive or anabolic therapy where indicated. Missing this "second fracture prevention" step is a recognised quality-of-care and medicolegal failing; the wrist fracture is the warning shot for the hip fracture to come, so treat the patient and the bone, not just the radius.
Guidelines, Registries & Global Practice
Global epidemiology:
Distal radius fractures are among the commonest fractures worldwide, with a bimodal age distribution - a peak in children and young adults from higher-energy mechanisms and a larger peak in older (predominantly female, osteoporotic) patients from low-energy falls. Prevalence has risen over four decades in both groups. Smith (volar-displacing) fractures are far less common than the dorsally displacing Colles pattern, but the volar pattern is over-represented among younger, higher-energy injuries (sport, motorcycle, direct dorsal blow), which is why mechanism shapes the demographic. The figures below are PubMed-verifiable population data, not country-specific framing.
- Pattern
- Among the commonest fractures globally; rising prevalence over 40 years
- Source / Note
- Nellans 2012 epidemiology review
- Pattern
- Bimodal: young high-energy peak and larger elderly fragility peak
- Source / Note
- Nellans 2012
- Pattern
- Smith is the minority volar-displacing pattern; Colles dominates overall
- Source / Note
- Volar pattern skews to younger, higher-energy injury
- Pattern
- Wrist/hand fractures are the commonest sport fractures; male predominance in young adults
- Source / Note
- Court-Brown 2008 sports-fracture epidemiology
Major guidelines, side by side:
There is no Smith-specific international guideline; recommendations come from the broader distal radius literature and society guidance. The unifying message across bodies is that an unstable, displaced, volarly translating distal radius fracture is poorly controlled by cast alone and is a strong indication for fixation, while low-demand elderly extra-articular fractures may be managed conservatively.
- Position relevant to Smith / volar shear
- Surgery favoured for fractures with post-reduction radial shortening, dorsal/volar tilt or articular step beyond accepted thresholds; in over-55s evidence does not strongly favour one fixation method
- Evidence basis
- Guideline synthesis, mostly moderate/limited strength
- Position relevant to Smith / volar shear
- Definitive fixation within accepted time windows; surgery for unstable or irreducible patterns; shared decision-making, especially in older adults
- Evidence basis
- Consensus + RCT evidence
- Position relevant to Smith / volar shear
- Volar shear (reverse Barton / Thomas II) is intrinsically unstable and is a surgical lesion; buttress/locked volar plate is the standard construct
- Evidence basis
- Mechanistic + outcome evidence
- Position relevant to Smith / volar shear
- Anatomic reduction and stable fixation for displaced unstable patterns; early mobilisation after rigid fixation
- Evidence basis
- Consensus + RCT/meta-analysis
Registry and trial evidence:
National joint registries (NJR, AJRR, AOANJRR, SHAR and others) primarily capture arthroplasty rather than fracture fixation, so distal radius implant-survival data come chiefly from trials and large cohorts rather than registries. The key high-level evidence is therefore:
- Arora 2011 RCT - volar plating gives better early function, grip strength and radiographic restoration than casting in patients 65 and older, but equivalent patient-rated outcomes at 12 months with more complications; this is the central plate-versus-cast trial.
- Soong 2011 - defined the watershed-line plate-prominence grading that governs flexor tendon rupture risk and is now a global benchmark for plate position.
- Handoll & Elliott 2015 Cochrane - no rehabilitation regimen is clearly superior; coached home exercise after stable plating performs at least as well as routine supervised physiotherapy.
Global practice variation:
- High-resource settings: volar locking plate fixation is the default for displaced/unstable Smith and volar-shear (Thomas II) fractures, enabling early motion.
- Limited-resource settings: closed reduction with sugar-tong/cast or K-wire fixation remains common where locking plates or image intensifiers are scarce; for a truly unstable volar-shear pattern this carries a higher redisplacement risk, so buttress fixation is prioritised when available.
- Older, low-demand patients: more variation - acceptance of a degree of malunion in exchange for avoiding surgery is reasonable for extra-articular patterns, but volar-shear instability with carpal translation still favours fixation in any setting.
Implant note (vendor-neutral):
Multiple anatomically pre-contoured volar locking plate systems are available worldwide, with fragment-specific options for complex articular patterns. The principle (a fixed-angle buttress proximal to the watershed line) matters far more than the manufacturer.
Smith fractures are a favoured topic across boards (FRACS, FRCS Tr & Orth, EBOT, ABOS, DNB) because they test: (1) distinguishing Smith from Colles on the lateral radiograph, (2) the Thomas classification and why Type II (volar Barton) is a surgical lesion, (3) the FCR approach and median-nerve safety, and (4) plate-position complications via the Soong grading. Expect a probe on plate-versus-cast evidence in the elderly (Arora) and on flexor tendon rupture mechanism (watershed line).
MCQ Practice Points
Q: What distinguishes a Smith fracture from a Colles fracture? A: Smith fracture has volar angulation (apex dorsal), Colles has dorsal angulation (apex volar). Smith = reverse Colles.
Q: A distal radius fracture with volar subluxation of the carpus and fracture of the volar rim is classified as: A: Thomas Type II Smith fracture (also known as volar Barton fracture). This is the most unstable Smith fracture pattern.
Q: What is the typical mechanism for a Smith fracture? A: Fall on outstretched hand with wrist in flexion, or direct blow to the dorsum of the hand. This contrasts with Colles which occurs with wrist in extension.
Q: In the FCR approach for volar plating, which structure is retracted ulnarly? A: The FCR tendon is retracted ulnarly. This protects the median nerve which lies ulnar to FCR.
Q: What is the most significant complication of volar plating related to plate position? A: Flexor pollicis longus rupture due to plate extending beyond the watershed line. Presents with loss of thumb IP flexion.
Clinical Decision Scenarios
Practise clinical reasoning and management decisions out loud
“A 32-year-old motorcyclist presents after low-speed fall onto his flexed left wrist. X-rays show a distal radius fracture with volar angulation. The fracture is extra-articular. How would you manage this patient?”
“A 45-year-old woman presents after a fall with a distal radius fracture. The lateral X-ray shows volar angulation with the carpus subluxated volarly. The fracture involves only the volar rim of the distal radius. What is your diagnosis and management?”
“You see a 55-year-old patient 8 months after volar plating of a Smith fracture. She reports sudden loss of ability to bend her thumb at the IP joint. Examination confirms no active FPL function. What is your diagnosis and management?”
DEFINING FEATURE
- Distal radius fracture with VOLAR angulation (apex dorsal)
- Reverse Colles - Smith = Sunrise (apex up)
- Less common than Colles (approximately 5% of distal radius fractures)
- Mechanism: FOOSH with flexed wrist or direct dorsal blow
THOMAS CLASSIFICATION
- Type I: Extra-articular transverse
- Type II: Intra-articular volar Barton (most unstable)
- Type III: Extra-articular oblique
- Type II ALWAYS needs surgery
MANAGEMENT
- Most displaced Smith fractures require surgical fixation
- Volar locking plate is standard treatment
- FCR approach: retract FCR ulnarly (protects median nerve)
- Plate provides BUTTRESS against volar displacement
KEY TECHNICAL POINTS
- Plate MUST be below watershed line
- Distal locking screws capture dorsal cortex
- Confirm with lateral fluoroscopy
- Repair pronator quadratus over plate
COMPLICATIONS
- FPL rupture (plate beyond watershed line)
- Median nerve injury (protect during approach)
- Malunion (ensure anatomic reduction)
- Hardware irritation (consider removal if symptomatic)
EXAM TRAPS
- Confusing Smith with Colles - CHECK LATERAL X-RAY
- Recommending casting for displaced Smith - high failure rate
- Missing Type II (volar Barton) pattern
- Plate placed too distal causing tendon problems
Evidence Base
- Landmark series of 29 patients (31 fractures) treated through a single volar approach with a new fixed-angle (locking) plate. Final volar tilt averaged 5 degrees, radial inclination 21 degrees, radial shortening 1mm, articular incongruity 0mm, grip strength 79% of contralateral. All Gartland and Werley scores were excellent or good. Preservation of dorsal soft tissues gave rapid healing with a low incidence of tendon problems.
- RCT of 73 patients: 36 volar locking plate versus 37 closed reduction and cast. Plating gave better early DASH/PRWE and significantly better grip strength at every time point, plus better radiographic restoration (dorsal tilt, radial inclination, radial shortening). However ROM, pain and patient-rated scores were equivalent at 12 months, and complications were higher in the operative group (13 versus 5).
- Two-cohort comparative study (168 plated radii) that defined the Soong grading of plate prominence relative to the volar critical (watershed) line: Grade 0 (proximal/not volar to the line), Grade 1 (volar to line but proximal to rim) and Grade 2 (on or distal to the rim). All flexor tendon ruptures occurred with the more prominent plate design, and Grade 2 prominence was strongly over-represented in the rupture cases.
- Cohort of 594 (later 321) volar-plated distal radius fractures. Plate-attributable complications were relatively uncommon; the commonest late problem was flexor tendon irritation (one frank FPL rupture), with intra-articular screws and tendon rupture as the major complications (about 1.3% early, less than 1% late). Higher-energy injury and ipsilateral elbow injury predicted early complications; plate design and surgeon familiarity influenced later ones.
- Distal radius fractures are among the commonest fractures worldwide, with a bimodal age distribution: a peak in children/young adults from higher-energy trauma and a larger peak in older (predominantly female, osteoporotic) patients from low-energy falls. Prevalence has trended upward over four decades in both the paediatric and elderly populations.
- Cochrane review of 26 RCTs (1269 patients). Evidence for any specific rehabilitation regimen was low or very low quality; after volar plate fixation, a structured home exercise programme preceded by therapist instruction performed at least as well as routine supervised physiotherapy, and accelerated rehabilitation gave only a short-term benefit.